Heather Brunt and her continuous abuse, harassment and perverted nonsense is encouraged by innocence fraud scammer Sandra Lean.
Some of malicious troll Heather Brunt’s continuous abuse, harassment, defamation and perverted nonsense has been referred to by What They Found in their recent video on the murderer and his enablers innocence fraud.
The latest video by What They Found can be listened to below;
Read more by tapping on the buttons below;
In 2007 scammer Sandra Lean made comparisons to guilty killers John Taft and Simon Hall’s cases to that of guilty killer Luke Mitchell.
Sandra Lean stated;
Like Simon Hall and John Taft, a central aspect to the case involves a piece of clothing claimed to have belonged to the defendant, but that claim is never, at any point, backed up by proof.
Also, as with Simon Hall, the lack of a definitive time of death allows a presumption to be presented almost as fact – neither Luke nor Simon had a cast iron alibi at a specific time, therefore the prosecution presumes that to be the time of death.
Failure of forensic experts to attend the scene in a timely manner allowed evidence to be lost in both of these cases.
Finally, as with Derek Christian and Simon Hall, we are asked to believe that Luke Mitchell suddenly and inexplicably “flipped,” behaving in a manner which is completely uncharacteristic, then almost instantly returns to normal.
Excerpts from Sandra Lean’s 1st discredited book No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice (first published in May 2007)
Tap on the button below to read a copy of scammer Sandra Lean’s chapter on guilty killer Luke Mitchell;
Common sense would surely suggest that people would question Sandra Lean’s credibility and that if she got so much so wrong in cases like guilty killers John Taft and Simon Hall’s cases, how much has she got wrong in killer Luke Mitchell’s case.
Heather Brunt, Roddy McKendry and Suzy Hall do not appear concerned by Sandra Lean’s misleading and false innocence fraud narratives.
Abusive troll Heather Brunt recently published a copy of a photograph of her latest target – an innocent man called James Falconer.
Roddy McKendry and Suzy Hall chose to comment underneath with their own deluded nonsense.
As much as these people say the worst thing ever is “accusing an innocent person”, they choose to do it anyway – as is evidenced below;
A February 2008 media article here stated that a “used condom was found 50 metres from the spot where Jodi was killed”.
Another article here stated;
As for Falconer, the defence say a recently used condom was found 50 metres from the murder scene.
DNA swabs matched a sample taken from Falconer two months ago.
The defence papers declare:
“His explanation given to police for semen in a condom lacked credibility and aspects of his statement have proven to be false.
Common sense would again surely suggest that innocent James Falconer may have met up with someone back in June 2003 and had “safe sex” by choosing to use a condom.
It is not known if James Falconer wrote his own witness statement or if a police officer wrote it for him.
However what is known is that James Falconer was ruled out of the investigation and his name was dropped from the 2008 appeal.
Innocent James Falconer had nothing whatsoever to do with killer Luke Mitchell’s murderous crimes.
Scammer Scott Forbes did not “come forward” until “some 18 months” after sadistic killer Luke Mitchell had been found guilty for his murder on 21st January 2005.
Scott Forbes did not make a statement until January 2008.
Excerpts from a February 2008 Herald article headed Man named in appeal tried to sell story to newspapers stated;
A man who claimed to have vital evidence which could clear Luke Mitchell of the horrific murder of his girlfriend, Jodi Jones, hoped to get a massive pay-off from selling his story, appeal judges heard yesterday.
Mitchell’s defence team wants the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh to hear more about claims that a cannabis smoker with unusual tastes in rock music and internet violence might be a possible “suspect”.
He was supposed to have been near the woods where Jodi, 14, was murdered in June, 2003, to have been acting strangely in the days following and to have sustained unexplained injuries to his face.
Donald Findlay, QC, said that the drug addict, named only as Mark Kane, “ticked all the same boxes” as Mitchell.
The lawyer told appeal judges that Mitchell’s defence team had been made aware of the addict by another man, Scott Forbes, who had first come forward some 18 months after Mitchell had been convicted of Jodi’s murder and given a life sentence.
Mr Findlay said that Mr Forbes had sworn out a statement last month and his claims were being investigated.
But John Beckett, QC, for the Crown, revealed that police investigations cast doubt on what Mr Forbes had told solicitors – and a BBC Frontline Scotland programme in May last year.
Excerpts from a Herald article headed Man named in appeal tried to sell story to newspapers dated 14th February 2008
Innocent Mark Kane was traced and eliminated during the police investigation via CCTV.
In Part 253 of this ongoing blog series, Scott Forbes is evidenced confirming killer Luke Mitchell had not stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house in Livingstone “for weeks” before he committed his murder.
Tap on the button below to read Part 253;
Fraudster Scott Forbes told numerous lies in his self published defamatory book.
The following is an excerpt from the defamatory book where Scott Forbes lies about killer Luke Mitchell hidden trousers with Jodi Jones🌻 DNA found on them;
Jodi Jones’ DNA was found on a pair of trousers belonging to Luke Mitchell. The trousers were in a holdall at his father’s house in Livingston, a home he hadn’t been to for at least a fortnight prior to the murder of Jodi. The evidence was, therefore, deemed irrelevant and agreed to be dismissed.
False statements by Scott Forbes taken from page 24 of his self published defamatory book
Abuser Heather Brunt, who is referred to in Part 252 of this blog series, re-produced Scott Forbes bare faced lie about killer Luke Mitchell’s hidden trousers on the 12th July 2023 via her Twitter social media account, as can be seen in the screenshot below;
Killer Luke Mitchell’s trousers, which had Jodi Jones🌻 DNA on them, were hidden in a holdall in his home at Newbattle Abbey Crescent NOT his father Philip Mitchell’s house in Livingstone.
Corinne Mitchell also highlighted this fact well over a decade ago, when she posted on un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton’s WAP website forum.
Below is a reproduction of one of Corinne Mitchell’s posts, taken from the now defunct WAP forum;
The above was copied from the UK Justice forum here
Again, killer Luke Mitchell’s hold-all was seized from his mother Corinne Mitchell’s house.
The excuse was that the hold-all was used by the killer when he stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house in Livingstone, not that it was seized from Philip Mitchell’s house!
Tap on the button below to read about reporting Scott Forbes’ self published defamatory book;
Much of the content of Scott Forbes self published book available on Amazon.co.uk is defamatory.
We have used one defamatory paragraph from his book in the below Notice to Amazon of Defamatory Content on Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.co.uk requests that you “set out” your full name, postal address, telephone number, email address and occupation.
Amazon.co.uk also state the following;
Please note that if you do not give consent to the disclosure of your name and email address, Amazon may be required to disclose your full contact details in response to a Court Order requested by the relevant author / publisher / manufacturer.
However at this stage of the Notice to Amazon of Defamatory Content on Amazon.co.uk, we suggest you omit most of your personal details for data privacy.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
Notice to Amazon of Defamatory Content on Amazon.co.uk
In the matter of http://www.amazon.co.uk
S T A T E M E N T
I, your name of your e-mail address, say as follows:
1. I refer to the website http://www.amazon.co.uk (“the website”). I make this statement in support of me giving Amazon.co.uk notice that, via the website, it is causing or contributing to the publication of a defamatory statement.
2. The defamatory words appears in a book being sold on the website entitled A Long Walk to Justice with ISBN number 1999617118. The defamatory content appears on page 56 of the book, on Amazon kindle.
3. The content that I consider to be defamatory is;
“As a teenager Joseph Jones found his father in the garden, who had committed suicide by hanging himself. It was reported that Joseph was never the same again, and that he partly blamed his sister for his fathers suicide. The night before Mr Jones hung himself, a nine year old Jodi walked into an “adult party” in the living room of her house. She ran out of the room grabbing a large bottle of vodka in protest. The following morning Joseph found his father in the garden.”
The defamatory content is unlawful because it is false and it is likely to cause ‘serious harm’ to the reputation of the people named.
Jodi Jones at the age of 9 years went on holiday with her gran Alice Walker, her aunt, uncle and cousins to Bulgaria. On her return Jodi Jones found out the devastating news her father was dead. He had taken his life whilst Jodi Jones was away from home. Jodi Jones mother made that horrific discovery in the garden the following morning.
7. I confirm that I do not have sufficient information about the person originally responsible for the content I am complaining about to enable me to bring proceedings against that person.
8. My complaint relates to defamatory content appearing in a book being sold on the website. I do not agree to my name and email address being provided by Amazon to the person originally responsible for the content I am complaining about.
9. I understand that this statement may be used in any court proceedings that may arise out of or relating to the defamatory content which I have complained about.
Statement of Truth
I declare the facts stated above to be true.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
UK Defamation Notice”& Send To defamation-notice@amazon.co.uk
Tap on the button below to read more on liars and abusers convicted killer Luke Mitchell, Scott Forbes and Sandra Lean;
Roberta Glass of the Roberta Glass True Crime Report recently published a video called Free Psycho Killer Luke Mitchell!, which can be listened to below;
At around 55:19 of the above video scammer Sandra Lean stated;
The, the prison officer told Luke
I don’t care what the law says
Sandra Lean
However convicted rapist Sean Parker, who was referred to in Parts 235 and 236 of this ongoing blog series (which can be read by tapping on the buttons below), chose to deceptively morph the “prison officer” into the “prison Governor”;
Personally I think that’s a very justifiable place
And obviously erm is to be fought in a court
But it shouldn’t be done by a prison Governor
Saying I don’t care what the law says
That’s erm of course of interest
In the home of enlightenment in Scotland
Registered sex offender Sean Bw Parker
The above can be heard at around 58:10 of the same video (above)
Fake lawyer, scammer and abuser Scott Forbes has made numerous defamatory accusations over the years, beginning towards his alleged “friend” Mark Kane.
Scott Forbes’s defamation and smear campaigns appear to have escalated since he appeared in a channel 5 TV show in February 2021 called Murder in a small town.
The TV show promoted the propaganda and innocence fraud of sadistic killer Luke Mitchell and his toxic enabler Sandra Lean.
Scott Forbes has used numerous “alternative accounts” on various social media platforms over the years, one of which was referred to in Part 125 of this blog series, which can be read by tapping on the button below;
Fraudster Scott Forbes often forgets to log out of his “alternate” social media accounts and has been caught out numerous times, including when he responded to Gerry Kelly using his GovanG51 account, as can be seen in the screenshot below;
Statements made by abuser and fraudster Scott Forbes, using one of his “alternative accounts” GovanG51, have been copied from the comments section of scammer Sandra Lean’s latest YouTube innocence fraud nonsense – where she spoke with registered sex offender and convicted rapist Sean Parker.
Sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell was, and is, the only person responsible for his murder and whilst someone may have gone on to make a statement claiming they saw Joseph Jones following his sister Jodi Jones🌻on the 30th June 2003.
There is no evidence anywhere to back up this fantasists allegations!
NOTE: Innocence Fraud Watch do not support or endorse any of the abusive, defamatory statements and bare faced lies made by Scott Forbes Aka GovanG5191 and are reproducing them below for evidential purposes only;
Tap on the button below to read how sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell’s violent nature was recognised by 7 years of age and how his violence escalated into murder one month shy of his 15th Birthday;
I think it’s clear that exonerations can be the result of fraud or misconduct on the part of post-conviction activists and litigators
John M Collins Jr
Registered sex offender and convicted rapist Sean Parker, who was referred to in Parts 235 and 236 of this ongoing blog series (which can be read by tapping on the buttons above), made the following statements about innocence fraud groomer Michael Naughton of Bristol university;
UK’s chief miscarriages of justice expert
He’s brilliant on the subject
He’s a pal of mine
He gives me these ideas of what to write about..
Registered sex offender Sean Bw Parker
Michael Naughton has been referred to throughout The Truth Behind Killer Simon Hall & His & His Deceitful Enablers Innocence Fraud Phenomenon Scam ongoing blog series.
Michael Naughton represented actual, factual guilty killer Simon Hall when the innocence fraud scam was exposed back in 2012/13.
In 2010 Michael Naughton told Stephanie (Hall), who was groomed and conned by killer Simon Hall, that un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton’s not proven verdict looked dubious.
Scammer Sandra Lean referred to “Empowering the innocent” in a recent Facebook post she made, as can be seen in the below screenshot;
Sandra Lean claimed in a further Facebook post she would be “speaking with them in the coming week”;
Michael Naughton tweeted on registered sex offender and convicted rapist Sean Bw Parker and scammer Sandra Lean on the 1st July 2023, as can be seen by the following screenshot;
The following are excerpts from Michael Naughton’s blog (here);
Empowering the Innocent (ETI) builds on this body of work and on previous innovative projects that were established by Dr Naughton, namely Innocence Network UK (INUK) and the University of Bristol Innocence Project, reflecting on both the successes and achievements of those projects as well as the lessons learnt
Michael Naughton
Some more on innocence fraud groomer Michael Naughton can be found by tapping on the button below.
To read about the deceitful and deceptive lengths he went to to free psychopathic killer Simon Hall, follow the links in the blog series.
Registered sex offender Sean Parker (Aka Benjamin/Ben Parker) was referred to in Part 235 of this ongoing blog series, which can be read by tapping on the button below;
The following comments were made on charlatan and scammer Sandra Lean’s latest youtube video;
Tap on the button below to read Part 229 regarding the abuse of innocent Steven Kelly;
Scott Forbes “LIARS” are the easiest to expose, and in your case transparent.
Having highlighted several directly around yourself, then placing that same question repeatedly, how do people accept anything you say, how can they even begin to determine what is true or not?
The utter BS of having defence papers in 2006 (Tap on the above button to read more), of being a lawyer for six (for Luke Mitchell) then 12 (for Luke Mitchell) to being an ex solicitor to not being near the case papers for years, constantly tripping over your lies, and that is only around you here.
I’m going to put one paragraph from your book up, we then take that paragraph, and we apply it across everything that comes out of your mouth –
Exposed Scott Forbes and apply under your chapter titled “LIARS”
But firstly Luke Mitchell and some further information.
Whilst a prisoner no longer needs to admit guilt for rehabilitation, they certainly need to carry out empathy courses, for the victim and their families
Innocent Scott Forbes is NOT someone constantly wanting to cause harm to multiple others, Innocence Scott Forbes is empathy, protection of the victim especially when that victim is their girlfriend.
Having enablers carry out a smear campaign of their victim Scott Forbes, lying about their victim, their family, a wilful intent to cause harm to other human life Scott Forbes, is NOT the actions of innocence.
Innocence is truth Scott Forbes
Neither Luke Mitchell, nor those enabling him are in anyway truthful Scott Forbes
Behave.
First the truth Scott Forbes, known by Luke Mitchell, by Sandra Lean and of course yourself.
One-chapter Scott Forbes to show without any semblance of doubt, just how easily you all lie, how easily you aim to cause harm to other human life, how easily you abuse the victim in this case, how easily you lie about her, how easily you abuse her and use her as a stick to beat others with.
How easily you do this for Luke Mitchell, on behalf of him, by being his vessel, his voice, after stating of that full control last year he would have.
Sandra Lean who states, “I do not work with liars”
Yes she does, she fully backs and aided you in that book, you tell us that, she tells us this when stating Luke Mitchell requested that she help you Scott Forbes.
So, the truth, and how there is absolutely no doubt that you all know the truth, backed to the hilt in statements, evidence heard in court and an essay from Jodi Jones herself.
Jodi at the age of 9 years went on holiday with her gran Alice Walker, her aunt, uncles and cousins to Bulgaria.
On her return she found out the devastating news her father was dead. He had taken his life whilst Jodi was away from home.
The family for several years had been staying with Alice Walker at her house. Whilst three members of the family slept Judith Jones, Joseph Jones (14) and Janine Jones (13).
Jodi’s mother made that horrific discovery the following morning.
The evidence in court, of who was present, of Jodi’s return home, the difficult times ahead in their grief.
Here Scott Forbes is you, Sandra Lean on behalf of Luke Mitchell;
As a teenager Joseph Jones found his father in the garden, who had committed suicide by hanging himself. It was reported that Joseph was never the same again, and that he partly blamed his sister for his fathers suicide. The night before Mr Jones hung himself, a nine year old Jodi walked into an “adult party” in the living room of her house. She ran out of the room grabbing a large bottle of vodka in protest. The following morning Joseph found his father in the garden…
Liar Scott Charles Forbes – October 2022
From your book Scott Forbes?
This is how Luke Mitchell, how you, how Sandra Lean abuse the victim Scott Forbes by blatantly lying, applying fantasy as a rod to fit Joseph Jones into some crazed up theories.
A 9 year old with vodka and all else who was 1000’s of miles away from home.
I am only highlighting this, to show and expose lies that cannot be denied.
There is of course so much more.
The further and constant abuse of turning her death into something it was not.
The manipulation around the forensics, the blanking of an agreement, to produce and incite people into believing that poor girl, who had suffered enough in the way she died, had been gang raped and all else..
This is how Luke Mitchell treats his girlfriend, that is how he continuously abuses her young precious life.
That is how his enablers carry out his work for him Scott Forbes.
By manipulating and bending the actual truth so far out of shape it becomes almost intangible.
Further information gleaned Scott Forbes, and as highlighted above, exposed fully for promoting blatant lies around the victim Scott Forbes and her family.
Joseph Jones has never worked at the place you call “Home Farm”.
He had for a while worked with his uncle at a place called Dalkeith Demolition, something else you are fully aware of, but as with the above, you simply bend and shape anything to fit into anything, to abuse people on behalf of Luke Mitchell.
It does not matter how many times you apply the word “reported” whether from people lying, to you manipulating those lies, that you know are lies –
It is how as you rightly state Scott Forbes “Rotten to the core…” what was it you were saying about “gossip”
(Guest blog: Courtesy of Parky41)
Again, the above statement “No one trashes your name, more than someone who is afraid you will tell the truth” was made by fake lawyer Scott C Forbes, seemingly with the approval of Sandra Lean, and Kathryn Londry an executive director of the Elizabeth Fry society of Kingston, who Scott C Forbes stated had done “months of work, proof reading and restructuring..”.
Sandra Lean also appears to be afraid of the “truth”, as referred to by Scott Forbes above.
Stephanie (Hall) who was groomed, conned and exploited by Joan Albert’s killer (And others including Sandra Lean) after meeting him over twenty years ago, has had no direct contact with Sandra Lean since a few months after Joan Albert’s killers inquest.
The last time any direct contact was had by Stephanie (Hall) with Sandra Lean was here in 2017.
On the 9th of February 2021 (which was around two weeks before Sandra Lean appeared in a channel 5 TV show) Sandra Lean stated of Stephanie (Hall) “I wrote her a little poem”.
The TV show promoted the innocence fraud spin of Jodi Jones🌻 killer, and no doubt re-traumatised Jodi Jones🌻 loved ones, and others, in the process.
Sandra Lean chose to publish the following to one of her Facebook social media accounts;
There were 10 comments made under the post, nearly half of which were by Sandra Lean stating;
Sandra Lean’s “poem” was liked 26 times and one of the people who chose to like and comment on Sandra’s post was the mother of the killer of Paul Gerard “PG” McGilvray – Carol Toal who stated;
Joan Albert’s killers actual, factual guilt was exposed and established in 2012/13 respectively (Read here to learn more), and following his suicide his older brother here set up a ‘memorial’ website.
A screenshot of part of the site can be seen in Part 11a of the ongoing Quite A Hall Tale blog series here.
The mother of the killer of Paul Gerard “PG” McGilvray also chose to make a public comment on this ‘memorial’ site back in 2014.
Just over three months after Sandra Lean published her “poem”, she made the following statements in the comment section of one of her videos;
The first book was withdrawn to correct one typo where the wrong name was printed in error and to be updated because some of the people whose cases were featured have since died. But for some people, what they don’t know, they’ll just make up.
The first book was not withdrawn because it was full of lies and mistakes – I already explained that, but I guess you’ll just carry on believing what you want to believe anyway.
If you watched this update, you’ll have heard what I said about confident ignorance – thanks for demonstrating it for people.
I still talk about Susan May, Gordon Park and Simon Hall as well. I didn’t say I stopped talking about them – I said that No Smoke was withdrawn to be UPDATED about their deaths. It really does help if you read my replies properly, otherwise you’re just wasting everyone’s time – including your own.
Sandra Lean via the comments section of her 23rd of May 2021 YouTube video here
The ‘one typo’ Sandra Lean refers to is yet another of Sandra’s bare faced lies!
Sandra Lean’s “one typo” lie will be partly addressed in Part 7 of this blog series, and her first innocence fraud book “No Smoke” will also be addressed in more detail in future parts of The Truth Behind Actual, Factual, Guilty Killer Simon Hall & His & His Deceitful Enablers Innocence Fraud Phenomenon Scam blog series – who Sandra Lean claimed to “still talk about”.
Over several days in June 2021 Scott C Forbes made numerous statements via Twitter, below are a few screenshots of his tweets;
Jodi Jones🌻 killer is locked away in a prison, and Sandra Lean and Scott Forbes cannot debunk Stephanie (Hall’s) arguments, only her character?
“No one trashes your name, more than someone who is afraid you will tell the truth”
INNOCENCE FRAUD WATCH 