Category: Suzy Hall

Killer Luke Mitchell: Where Is The Evidence Neil MacKay Visited Murderer Luke Mitchell & Why Would An Alleged “Senior Police Officer” Linked To The Original Investigation Have Contacted A Random Reporter In Glasgow? (Part 265)

Neil MacKay, pictured above, who was referred to in Part 261 of this ongoing blog series (which can be read by tapping on the button below) referred to killer Luke Mitchell in 2021 as a “Satan-worshipping, scary, gothic character”.

Neil MacKay From The 2021 Innocence Fraud TV Show “Murder In A Small Town”, His Alleged “Phone Call” From “A Senior Police Officer” In 2003/04 & His “Jail” Visit With The Murderer & Conversation With Murderers Mother Corinne Mitchell (Part 261)

As previously stated in Part 261 of this ongoing blog series, Neil MacKay claimed in 2021 that he “visited” killer Luke Mitchell in “jail”.

When exactly did this alleged “jail” visit take place and if Neil MacKay did visit with killer Luke Mitchell why didn’t he report on this visit?

Below are excerpts from a 2021 Herald article written by Neil MacKay;

In the run-up to (Luke) Mitchell’s trial I received a very strange phone call from a senior police officer in which I was told a number of unsubstantiated and shocking claims about (Luke)Mitchell.

I was told (Luke) Mitchell was definitely guilty.

In all my years as a reporter – covering some of the most serious crimes in recent British criminal history, including major terrorist offences – I’ve never received such a phone call from police.

A lot of the telephone conversation centred on (Luke) Mitchell’s love of gothic music and his alternative lifestyle.

Excerpts from Neil MacKay’s article for the Herald headed Murder in a small town: Could Luke Mitchell be innocent of the murder of Jodi Jones? dated 21st February 2021

Suzy Hall Has Claimed She “Believed” Neil MacKay

Suzy Hall, who was referred to in the previous Part of this blog series here has contacted Innocence Fraud Watch to say “I believe Neil”.

It is not known why Suzy Hall believes Neil MacKay, however as previously stated; why would an alleged “senior police officer” linked to the original investigation contact a random reporter in Glasgow to allegedly speak about a 14/15 year old murder suspects “love of gothic music and his alternative lifestyle”? – this sounds ludicrous!

On the 21st July 2023 Suzy Hall tweeted a quote from crime reporter Jane Hamilton.

Jane Hamilton stated in 2021;

there were no secret briefings about (Luke) Mitchell to the media

Excerpt by Jane Hamilton for the Daily Record article headed Dignified silence of Jodi Jones’s mum was last thing she could do for murdered daughter dated 27th February 2021

and there has been zero evidence provided to support that there ever was!

Suzy Hall is under the wrong impression that Jane Hamilton lied in her article.

Suzy Hall

If Jane Hamilton had lied, why did Neil MacKay choose to remain silent and not address Jane Hamilton’s statement?

Other than Neil MacKay’s article in 2021, when did he previously write anything on killer Luke Mitchell?

Maybe Suzy Hall should ask Neil MacKay to provide the name of this alleged “senior police officer” who allegedly rang him to allegedly have a conversation about a 14/15 year old murder suspects “love of gothic music and his alternative lifestyle”.

Innocence Fraud Watch asked Neil MacKay in March 2021 who the police officer who allegedly contacted him was;

Innocence Fraud Watch also asked Neil MacKay why he chose to sit on his allegations for almost 18 years.

Rather than answer the questions, Neil MacKay chose to block Innocence Fraud Watch – which in itself was extremely telling.

Link to Part 266 here

Killer Luke Mitchell: Roddy McKendry, Suzy Hall & Abusive Troll Heather Brunt Choose To Continue To Drag Innocent James Falconer’s Name “Into The Mud” 15 Years After The 2008 Appeal (Part 264)

In 2007 scammer Sandra Lean made comparisons to guilty killers John Taft and Simon Hall’s cases to that of guilty killer Luke Mitchell.

Sandra Lean stated;

Like Simon Hall and John Taft, a central aspect to the case involves a piece of clothing claimed to have belonged to the defendant, but that claim is never, at any point, backed up by proof.

Also, as with Simon Hall, the lack of a definitive time of death allows a presumption to be presented almost as fact – neither Luke nor Simon had a cast iron alibi at a specific time, therefore the prosecution presumes that to be the time of death.

Failure of forensic experts to attend the scene in a timely manner allowed evidence to be lost in both of these cases.

Finally, as with Derek Christian and Simon Hall, we are asked to believe that Luke Mitchell suddenly and inexplicably “flipped,” behaving in a manner which is completely uncharacteristic, then almost instantly returns to normal.

Excerpts from Sandra Lean’s 1st discredited book No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice (first published in May 2007)

Tap on the button below to read a copy of scammer Sandra Lean’s chapter on guilty killer Luke Mitchell;

Copy of Chapter From Sandra Lean’s 1st Discredited Smoke & Mirrors “No Smoke” Book Promoting The Innocence Fraud Phenomenon Of Actually, Factually Guilty Killer Luke Mitchell & 6 Other Guilty Killers

Common sense would surely suggest that people would question Sandra Lean’s credibility and that if she got so much so wrong in cases like guilty killers John Taft and Simon Hall’s cases, how much has she got wrong in killer Luke Mitchell’s case.

Suzy Hall
Roddy McKendry
Heather Brunt

Heather Brunt, Roddy McKendry and Suzy Hall do not appear concerned by Sandra Lean’s misleading and false innocence fraud narratives.

Abusive troll Heather Brunt recently published a copy of a photograph of her latest target – an innocent man called James Falconer.

Roddy McKendry and Suzy Hall chose to comment underneath with their own deluded nonsense.

As much as these people say the worst thing ever is “accusing an innocent person”, they choose to do it anyway – as is evidenced below;

A February 2008 media article here stated that a “used condom was found 50 metres from the spot where Jodi was killed”.

Another article here stated;

As for Falconer, the defence say a recently used condom was found 50 metres from the murder scene.

DNA swabs matched a sample taken from Falconer two months ago.

The defence papers declare:

“His explanation given to police for semen in a condom lacked credibility and aspects of his statement have proven to be false.

Common sense would again surely suggest that innocent James Falconer may have met up with someone back in June 2003 and had “safe sex” by choosing to use a condom.

It is not known if James Falconer wrote his own witness statement or if a police officer wrote it for him.

However what is known is that James Falconer was ruled out of the investigation and his name was dropped from the 2008 appeal.

Innocent James Falconer had nothing whatsoever to do with killer Luke Mitchell’s murderous crimes.

Link to Part 265 here