Heather Brunt and her continuous abuse, harassment and perverted nonsense is encouraged by innocence fraud scammer Sandra Lean.
Some of malicious troll Heather Brunt’s continuous abuse, harassment, defamation and perverted nonsense has been referred to by What They Found in their recent video on the murderer and his enablers innocence fraud.
The latest video by What They Found can be listened to below;
Read more by tapping on the buttons below;
Neil MacKay, pictured above, who was referred to in Part 261 of this ongoing blog series (which can be read by tapping on the button below) referred to killer Luke Mitchell in 2021 as a “Satan-worshipping, scary, gothic character”.
As previously stated in Part 261 of this ongoing blog series, Neil MacKay claimed in 2021 that he “visited” killer Luke Mitchell in “jail”.
When exactly did this alleged “jail” visit take place and if Neil MacKay did visit with killer Luke Mitchell why didn’t he report on this visit?
Below are excerpts from a 2021 Herald article written by Neil MacKay;
In the run-up to (Luke) Mitchell’s trial I received a very strange phone call from a senior police officer in which I was told a number of unsubstantiated and shocking claims about (Luke)Mitchell.
I was told (Luke) Mitchell was definitely guilty.
In all my years as a reporter – covering some of the most serious crimes in recent British criminal history, including major terrorist offences – I’ve never received such a phone call from police.
A lot of the telephone conversation centred on (Luke) Mitchell’s love of gothic music and his alternative lifestyle.
Excerpts from Neil MacKay’s article for the Herald headed Murder in a small town: Could Luke Mitchell be innocent of the murder of Jodi Jones? dated 21st February 2021
Suzy Hall, who was referred to in the previous Part of this blog series here has contacted Innocence Fraud Watch to say “I believe Neil”.
It is not known why Suzy Hall believes Neil MacKay, however as previously stated; why would an alleged “senior police officer” linked to the original investigation contact a random reporter in Glasgow to allegedly speak about a 14/15 year old murder suspects “love of gothic music and his alternative lifestyle”? – this sounds ludicrous!
On the 21st July 2023 Suzy Hall tweeted a quote from crime reporter Jane Hamilton.
Jane Hamilton stated in 2021;
there were no secret briefings about (Luke) Mitchell to the media
Excerpt by Jane Hamilton for the Daily Record article headed Dignified silence of Jodi Jones’s mum was last thing she could do for murdered daughter dated 27th February 2021
and there has been zero evidence provided to support that there ever was!
Suzy Hall is under the wrong impression that Jane Hamilton lied in her article.
If Jane Hamilton had lied, why did Neil MacKay choose to remain silent and not address Jane Hamilton’s statement?
Other than Neil MacKay’s article in 2021, when did he previously write anything on killer Luke Mitchell?
Maybe Suzy Hall should ask Neil MacKay to provide the name of this alleged “senior police officer” who allegedly rang him to allegedly have a conversation about a 14/15 year old murder suspects “love of gothic music and his alternative lifestyle”.
Innocence Fraud Watch asked Neil MacKay in March 2021 who the police officer who allegedly contacted him was;
Innocence Fraud Watch also asked Neil MacKay why he chose to sit on his allegations for almost 18 years.
Rather than answer the questions, Neil MacKay chose to block Innocence Fraud Watch – which in itself was extremely telling.
In 2007 scammer Sandra Lean made comparisons to guilty killers John Taft and Simon Hall’s cases to that of guilty killer Luke Mitchell.
Sandra Lean stated;
Like Simon Hall and John Taft, a central aspect to the case involves a piece of clothing claimed to have belonged to the defendant, but that claim is never, at any point, backed up by proof.
Also, as with Simon Hall, the lack of a definitive time of death allows a presumption to be presented almost as fact – neither Luke nor Simon had a cast iron alibi at a specific time, therefore the prosecution presumes that to be the time of death.
Failure of forensic experts to attend the scene in a timely manner allowed evidence to be lost in both of these cases.
Finally, as with Derek Christian and Simon Hall, we are asked to believe that Luke Mitchell suddenly and inexplicably “flipped,” behaving in a manner which is completely uncharacteristic, then almost instantly returns to normal.
Excerpts from Sandra Lean’s 1st discredited book No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice (first published in May 2007)
Tap on the button below to read a copy of scammer Sandra Lean’s chapter on guilty killer Luke Mitchell;
Common sense would surely suggest that people would question Sandra Lean’s credibility and that if she got so much so wrong in cases like guilty killers John Taft and Simon Hall’s cases, how much has she got wrong in killer Luke Mitchell’s case.
Heather Brunt, Roddy McKendry and Suzy Hall do not appear concerned by Sandra Lean’s misleading and false innocence fraud narratives.
Abusive troll Heather Brunt recently published a copy of a photograph of her latest target – an innocent man called James Falconer.
Roddy McKendry and Suzy Hall chose to comment underneath with their own deluded nonsense.
As much as these people say the worst thing ever is “accusing an innocent person”, they choose to do it anyway – as is evidenced below;
A February 2008 media article here stated that a “used condom was found 50 metres from the spot where Jodi was killed”.
Another article here stated;
As for Falconer, the defence say a recently used condom was found 50 metres from the murder scene.
DNA swabs matched a sample taken from Falconer two months ago.
The defence papers declare:
“His explanation given to police for semen in a condom lacked credibility and aspects of his statement have proven to be false.
Common sense would again surely suggest that innocent James Falconer may have met up with someone back in June 2003 and had “safe sex” by choosing to use a condom.
It is not known if James Falconer wrote his own witness statement or if a police officer wrote it for him.
However what is known is that James Falconer was ruled out of the investigation and his name was dropped from the 2008 appeal.
Innocent James Falconer had nothing whatsoever to do with killer Luke Mitchell’s murderous crimes.
Neil MacKay, who chose to appear in the 2021 channel 5 two part TV innocence fraud show titled Murder In A Small Town, stated at the time sadistic killer Luke Mitchell chose to commit his murder of Jodi Jones🌻 “there was a moral panic around teenagers listening to music their parents found disagreeable”.
It is not known if Corinne Mitchell was aware of this alleged “moral panic” at the time her youngest son Luke Mitchell chose to commit his murder, however Neil MacKay also stated;
As a reporter, I later visited (Luke) Mitchell in jail, and spoke with his mother
It is also not known when exactly Neil MacKay visited with sadistic killer Luke Mitchell.
However what is known is that in order for Neil MacKay to visit with killer Luke Mitchell he would have required “special permission” to do so.
Killer Luke Mitchell would have also been required to put in an application to his prison Governor to obtain permission for a visit with Neil MacKay.
It is also not known when exactly Neil MacKay spoke with Corinne Mitchell and what exactly the killer and his mother Corinne spoke to Neil MacKay about.
Neil Mackay stated in his February 2021 article for the Herald that he was “a reporter” at the time killer Luke Mitchell committed his murder.
According to a bio on Neil MacKay here it states that he was “originally from Antrim, in Northern Ireland” and “worked in Belfast before moving to Glasgow in 1996”.
Neil MacKay stated;
I was investigations editor with the Herald newspapers at the time of the Jodi Jones murder, and I appear as a interviewee in the documentary Murder In A Small Town.
In the run-up to (Luke) Mitchell’s trial I received a very strange phone call from a senior police officer in which I was told a number of unsubstantiated and shocking claims about Mitchell.
I was told Mitchell was definitely guilty.
In all my years as a reporter – covering some of the most serious crimes in recent British criminal history, including major terrorist offences – I’ve never received such a phone call from police.
A lot of the telephone conversation centred on (Luke) Mitchell’s love of Goth music and his alternative lifestyle.
Excerpts from Neil MacKay’s article for the Herald headed Murder in a small town: Could Luke Mitchell be innocent of the murder of Jodi Jones? dated 21st February 2021
What articles did Neil MacKay write and have published in 2003, 2004 and 2005, if any and why would a “senior police officer” linked to the investigation allegedly contact Neil MacKay, a random reporter in Glasgow about sadistic killer Luke Mitchell?
There is no evidence anywhere to suggest Neil MacKay even attended the killers 2004/05 trial.
Innocence Fraud Watch included excerpts from an article written and published by the Herald which reported on Judith Jones evidence regarding her 10:20pm text message to killer Luke Mitchell in Part 195 of this ongoing blog series.
Part 195 can be read by tapping on the button below;
On the 26th November 2004 Judith Jones was called to give evidence during her daughter Jodi Jones🌻 murderers trial.
However the Herald did not publish Judith Jones’ evidence heard on the 26th November 2004, until the following day.
On the 27th November 2004 the Herald published the following excerpts;
At 10.20pm, she texted a message to Mr Mitchell’s phone, because Jodi’s was broken:
”Right Toad (Jodi’s nickname), that’s you grounded for another three weeks” it said.
A minute later, Mr Mitchell called back.
Mrs Jones said:
”He said he hadn’t seen Jodi all night. I said:
What do you mean you haven’t seen her?
She was with you?’
If I recollect, I just put the phone down. There was something really wrong”
She called Mr Mitchell back and told him:
“I just want the truth.
If she is with you, I don’t care.
I just want to know.
He said: I haven’t seen her”
Mrs Jones began phoning friends and later she called the police. Jodi’s body was found later that night.
Excerpts from an article by the Herald headed She gave me a kiss and went out. I never saw Jodi again Mother tells murder trial of phone calls to accused after daughter went missing dated 27th November 2004
Then almost one month after Judith Jones gave her evidence, detective constable (Dc) Alan Towers was called to give evidence in regards to the killers evidence.
Almost a month after the jury were told Judith Jones texted killer Luke Mitchell at 10:20pm the Herald published the following excerpts;
Detective Constable Alan Towers, 43, said that Mr Mitchell wrote a statement which ran to 22 pages.
A text message to his mobile from Jodi’s mother at 10.41pm the previous night first alerted him to the fact that something was wrong, he said.
The jury heard how Mr Mitchell then met Jodi’s grandmother, sister and the sister’s boyfriend, and continued searching along the wooded Roan’s Dyke path in Dalkeith, Midlothian. “They were panicky, ” he told Mr Towers
The statement, read in court by the detective, continued:
“We walked past the V-shaped break in the wall and a few yards past that, not even 20 yards past that..
Excerpts from an article by The Herald dated the 21st of December 2004 – Read full article here
Why did the Herald go from reporting Judith Jones text message as being sent at 10:20pm on the 27th November 2004 to then adding almost 21 minutes to this time, almost a month later?
More on killer Luke Mitchell’s evidence can be read in Part 65 of this ongoing blog series, which can be found by tapping on the button below,
Scammer Scott Forbes did not “come forward” until “some 18 months” after sadistic killer Luke Mitchell had been found guilty for his murder on 21st January 2005.
Scott Forbes did not make a statement until January 2008.
Excerpts from a February 2008 Herald article headed Man named in appeal tried to sell story to newspapers stated;
A man who claimed to have vital evidence which could clear Luke Mitchell of the horrific murder of his girlfriend, Jodi Jones, hoped to get a massive pay-off from selling his story, appeal judges heard yesterday.
Mitchell’s defence team wants the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh to hear more about claims that a cannabis smoker with unusual tastes in rock music and internet violence might be a possible “suspect”.
He was supposed to have been near the woods where Jodi, 14, was murdered in June, 2003, to have been acting strangely in the days following and to have sustained unexplained injuries to his face.
Donald Findlay, QC, said that the drug addict, named only as Mark Kane, “ticked all the same boxes” as Mitchell.
The lawyer told appeal judges that Mitchell’s defence team had been made aware of the addict by another man, Scott Forbes, who had first come forward some 18 months after Mitchell had been convicted of Jodi’s murder and given a life sentence.
Mr Findlay said that Mr Forbes had sworn out a statement last month and his claims were being investigated.
But John Beckett, QC, for the Crown, revealed that police investigations cast doubt on what Mr Forbes had told solicitors – and a BBC Frontline Scotland programme in May last year.
Excerpts from a Herald article headed Man named in appeal tried to sell story to newspapers dated 14th February 2008
Innocent Mark Kane was traced and eliminated during the police investigation via CCTV.
In Part 253 of this ongoing blog series, Scott Forbes is evidenced confirming killer Luke Mitchell had not stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house in Livingstone “for weeks” before he committed his murder.
Tap on the button below to read Part 253;
Fraudster Scott Forbes told numerous lies in his self published defamatory book.
The following is an excerpt from the defamatory book where Scott Forbes lies about killer Luke Mitchell hidden trousers with Jodi Jones🌻 DNA found on them;
Jodi Jones’ DNA was found on a pair of trousers belonging to Luke Mitchell. The trousers were in a holdall at his father’s house in Livingston, a home he hadn’t been to for at least a fortnight prior to the murder of Jodi. The evidence was, therefore, deemed irrelevant and agreed to be dismissed.
False statements by Scott Forbes taken from page 24 of his self published defamatory book
Abuser Heather Brunt, who is referred to in Part 252 of this blog series, re-produced Scott Forbes bare faced lie about killer Luke Mitchell’s hidden trousers on the 12th July 2023 via her Twitter social media account, as can be seen in the screenshot below;
Killer Luke Mitchell’s trousers, which had Jodi Jones🌻 DNA on them, were hidden in a holdall in his home at Newbattle Abbey Crescent NOT his father Philip Mitchell’s house in Livingstone.
Corinne Mitchell also highlighted this fact well over a decade ago, when she posted on un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton’s WAP website forum.
Below is a reproduction of one of Corinne Mitchell’s posts, taken from the now defunct WAP forum;
The above was copied from the UK Justice forum here
Again, killer Luke Mitchell’s hold-all was seized from his mother Corinne Mitchell’s house.
The excuse was that the hold-all was used by the killer when he stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house in Livingstone, not that it was seized from Philip Mitchell’s house!
Tap on the button below to read about reporting Scott Forbes’ self published defamatory book;
Much of the content of Scott Forbes self published book available on Amazon.co.uk is defamatory.
We have used one defamatory paragraph from his book in the below Notice to Amazon of Defamatory Content on Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.co.uk requests that you “set out” your full name, postal address, telephone number, email address and occupation.
Amazon.co.uk also state the following;
Please note that if you do not give consent to the disclosure of your name and email address, Amazon may be required to disclose your full contact details in response to a Court Order requested by the relevant author / publisher / manufacturer.
However at this stage of the Notice to Amazon of Defamatory Content on Amazon.co.uk, we suggest you omit most of your personal details for data privacy.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
Notice to Amazon of Defamatory Content on Amazon.co.uk
In the matter of http://www.amazon.co.uk
S T A T E M E N T
I, your name of your e-mail address, say as follows:
1. I refer to the website http://www.amazon.co.uk (“the website”). I make this statement in support of me giving Amazon.co.uk notice that, via the website, it is causing or contributing to the publication of a defamatory statement.
2. The defamatory words appears in a book being sold on the website entitled A Long Walk to Justice with ISBN number 1999617118. The defamatory content appears on page 56 of the book, on Amazon kindle.
3. The content that I consider to be defamatory is;
“As a teenager Joseph Jones found his father in the garden, who had committed suicide by hanging himself. It was reported that Joseph was never the same again, and that he partly blamed his sister for his fathers suicide. The night before Mr Jones hung himself, a nine year old Jodi walked into an “adult party” in the living room of her house. She ran out of the room grabbing a large bottle of vodka in protest. The following morning Joseph found his father in the garden.”
The defamatory content is unlawful because it is false and it is likely to cause ‘serious harm’ to the reputation of the people named.
Jodi Jones at the age of 9 years went on holiday with her gran Alice Walker, her aunt, uncle and cousins to Bulgaria. On her return Jodi Jones found out the devastating news her father was dead. He had taken his life whilst Jodi Jones was away from home. Jodi Jones mother made that horrific discovery in the garden the following morning.
7. I confirm that I do not have sufficient information about the person originally responsible for the content I am complaining about to enable me to bring proceedings against that person.
8. My complaint relates to defamatory content appearing in a book being sold on the website. I do not agree to my name and email address being provided by Amazon to the person originally responsible for the content I am complaining about.
9. I understand that this statement may be used in any court proceedings that may arise out of or relating to the defamatory content which I have complained about.
Statement of Truth
I declare the facts stated above to be true.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
UK Defamation Notice”& Send To defamation-notice@amazon.co.uk
Tap on the button below to read more on liars and abusers convicted killer Luke Mitchell, Scott Forbes and Sandra Lean;
Fake lawyer, scammer and abuser Scott Forbes has made numerous defamatory accusations over the years, beginning towards his alleged “friend” Mark Kane.
Scott Forbes’s defamation and smear campaigns appear to have escalated since he appeared in a channel 5 TV show in February 2021 called Murder in a small town.
The TV show promoted the propaganda and innocence fraud of sadistic killer Luke Mitchell and his toxic enabler Sandra Lean.
Scott Forbes has used numerous “alternative accounts” on various social media platforms over the years, one of which was referred to in Part 125 of this blog series, which can be read by tapping on the button below;
Fraudster Scott Forbes often forgets to log out of his “alternate” social media accounts and has been caught out numerous times, including when he responded to Gerry Kelly using his GovanG51 account, as can be seen in the screenshot below;
Statements made by abuser and fraudster Scott Forbes, using one of his “alternative accounts” GovanG51, have been copied from the comments section of scammer Sandra Lean’s latest YouTube innocence fraud nonsense – where she spoke with registered sex offender and convicted rapist Sean Parker.
Sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell was, and is, the only person responsible for his murder and whilst someone may have gone on to make a statement claiming they saw Joseph Jones following his sister Jodi Jones🌻on the 30th June 2003.
There is no evidence anywhere to back up this fantasists allegations!
NOTE: Innocence Fraud Watch do not support or endorse any of the abusive, defamatory statements and bare faced lies made by Scott Forbes Aka GovanG5191 and are reproducing them below for evidential purposes only;
Tap on the button below to read how sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell’s violent nature was recognised by 7 years of age and how his violence escalated into murder one month shy of his 15th Birthday;
After being duped by scammer Sandra Lean and sadistic, psychopathic killer Luke Mitchell and their innocence fraud propaganda scam, Dawn Taylor has apparently “introduced” her 16 year old son to the teenage killers brutal murder of one of his 14 year old girlfriends – Jodi Jones🌻
Dawn Taylor did not attend the killers 42 day trial in 2004/05 and therefore has no idea of all the evidence heard during those 42 days.
Dawn Taylor is also not aware of all of actual, factual guilty killer Luke Mitchell’s evidence.
The reason Dawn Taylor is not aware of guilty killer Luke Mitchell’s evidence is due to the fact he and scammer Sandra Lean have been hiding it – for 20 years!
On the 1st July 2003 killer Luke Mitchell wrote a 22 page witness statement.
This 22 page witness statement was read out at the beginning of his trial by detective constable Alan Towers.
The media only ever reported on a few sentences from the killers 22 page witness statement.
Tap on the button below to read how sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell’s violent nature was recognised by 7 years of age and how his violence escalated into murder one month shy of his 15th Birthday;
Deluded dupe Lynette Morrison, who was referred to in Part 243 of this blog series (which can be read by tapping on the button below), commented underneath Dawn Taylor’s Facebook post;
After being duped by scammer Sandra Lean and sadistic, psychopathic killer Luke Mitchell and their innocence fraud scam, Michelle Mulligan wrote to the Scottish prison service to make a complaint.
Michelle Mulligan did not attend the killers 42 day trial in 2004/05 and therefore has no idea of all the evidence heard during those 42 days.
Michelle Mulligan is also not aware of all of actual, factual guilty killer Luke Mitchell’s evidence.
The reason Michelle Mulligan is not aware of killer Luke Mitchell’s evidence is due to the fact he and scammer Sandra Lean have been hiding it – for 20 years!
On the 1st July 2003 killer Luke Mitchell wrote a 22 page witness statement.
This 22 page witness statement was read out at the beginning of his trial by detective constable Alan Towers.
The media only ever reported on a few sentences from the killers 22 page witness statement.
Below is a screenshot of a copy of a letter Michelle Mulligan received from Morag Stirling, the governor at HMP Greenock;
Morag Stirling also enclosed a disclosure of information form for Michelle Mulligan, which needs to be signed by killer Luke Mitchell in order to give his permission for the prison service to disclose the “relevant information” about him “including any sensitive personal information”
Michelle Mulligan made the following post on one of the Facebook groups promoting the innocence fraud of the guilty killer;
If killer Luke Mitchell has nothing to hide he will sign the “disclosure of information” form to allow the prison service to respond to Michelle Mulligan.
Sadistic killer Luke Mitchell was in custody at HMP Greenock before he was recently transferred back to closed prison conditions, seemingly due to the fact his risks changed.
This happened to actual, factual guilty killer Simon Hall in 2013.
Scammer Sandra Lean was also involved in the innocence fraud scam of actual, factual guilty killer Simon Hall.
Tap on the button below to read more about killer Simon Hall, who’s case featured in the last ever BBC Rough Justice TV show.
Allan Jamieson who appeared in the channel 5 TV show on killer Luke Mitchell, which aired in February 2021, also appeared in the Rough Justice TV show on killer Simon Hall in 2007;
Tap on the button below to read how sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell’s violent nature was recognised by 7 years of age and how his violence escalated into murder one month shy of his 15th Birthday;
Innocence fraudster Sandra Lean has waited almost 20 years to announce her eldest daughters high school apparently had 7 CCTV cameras.
There is no evidence anywhere to suggest the CCTV camera’s at Newbattle high school were “overlooking the crime scene” as has been stated today (25th June 2023).
INNOCENCE FRAUD WATCH 