The Idaho Murders: Portrait of A Psychopath
Author: Admin
Killer Luke Mitchell: What Was The Sadistic Murderer Doing For Those 18 Minutes (Part 220)
*Guest Blog*
From Aliice Walker’s court testimony.
She says: “The only place I could think to go was the path because that was the last place Jodi was going. Judith texted or phoned to say Luke was at the other end of the path”
Take that in… “that was the last place Jodi was going”
Why would Alice think that? Who had told her that? Not Judith surely as she allegedly thought Jodi was ‘mucking about up here ( Easthouses)’?
You really do just keep on giving – Luke on path, no show, usual meeting place at the path, head to the area after phone checks made, because, Luke on path, where else? Last place, usual meeting place, no show, Luke on path. Now let us look at 10:59-11:18pm. But first.
10:40 – 11:34pm – Luke Mitchell to Luke Mitchell, not seen Jodi to dialling 999.
10:40 – Not seen
10:50pm, less than 10mins later he has instantly initiated an actual physical search directly to the path, nothing of that 5min walk to there, just that path.
10:59pm – Tells Jodi’s mother he is on that path.
10:41 – 11:05pm – All contact/communication to Alice Walker (three), directly to her house landline, switching to mobile after 11:05pm. Calls to police, checks made by phone to others. Jodi’s mother is awaiting the arrival of the police any moment. The three leave to head to the path, by that point Luke Mitchell had been on the path around 5mins alone.
11:18pm – Important time, last mobile contact, before the arrival of the police, before the three arrive at the path, before the 4 meet.
11:20 – 22pm – The police are in Jodi’s house, the three arrive at the path, where is Luke Mitchell? Around 2/3 up. Take him back to 11:18pm, to cover that distance to 2/3, where is he? Around that V break area.
10:59pm enters that path, by 11:18pm he is still around the bottom area, around that V break area, around the area where that young girls body had been hidden on the other side of that wall. Alice Walker and why to the path? Really!
No dear, we want to know what Luke Mitchell was doing in those 18mins, that had him not move up from that V break area until after the last mobile contact, when knowing the others were about to arrive at the path.
10:40 – 11:20-22pm – Luke Mitchell told Jodi’s mother he had not seen her, instantly initiated search directly to the path, leading others to the area, held back around one given area, moving on from this around 11:18pm, meets with others, they walk down to be in his presence physically, they head off together around 11:24pm.
After going directly to the path, instantly into physical search mode, holding back, bringing others to the path, what does he do? He wades through several feet of undergrowth directly to that wall at the Gino break, up and shines his torch directly to the back of that wall, to later claim he had a “hunch“. 11:25-26pm. –
Initiated search directly to locus, brought others there, directly to the wall, initiating and planting that seed of his “something” being directly behind that wall. –
We are 46mins in now, from not seen, directly to path, holding back, directly to that wall – Luke, Luke, Luke, and on it goes.
Position, nothing else counts for anything, 4 people, very first accounts, three directly to the V break from the east, one not quite 60ft past.
Only the three can be correct in their account, those descriptions which could only have been given exactly as stated, from the east to that V break, Luke Mitchell was lying, and he lied because he had to try and give reason for knowing exactly where to go behind that wall, he lied about the position and the position is the very essence of Luke Mitchell knowing exactly where that young girls body had been hidden, some 43ft west of that V break within that woodland strip.
And he lied some more, for he attempted to claim he had walked more that his actual 10ft behind that wall, naming types of trees, that bobble, clothes etc.
Sticking himself fast in his own web of deceit.
54mins Luke to Luke, every step of the way.
Around 5mins together heading down that path, straight to the wall, and again straight to the next break as with the first. The lie, the change in account by those three people from Jodi’s family was of who was leading who, always directly to those breaks, position, position, position.
So, why instantly into physical search mode, why directly to the path and nothing of those 5mins, why holding back about around that V break? why directly to that wall at the Gino break then the V break? Police? Control? Kicks? cocksure?
And why the incessant lies from Sandra Lean and co, those enablers who are in absolutely no doubt whatsoever of the truth here?
So, instead of harping on about absolute nonsense here –
Get the lot up and out there, let us see those changes in accounts you speak of, let us see what was still adopted at trial from those very first accounts –
Oh wait, that is correct, it will be, we can’t possibly do any of this, of course you can’t –
Far better to live in a world of fallacy and constant deception to place irrelevant focus elsewhere away from Luke Mitchell. Dog? Nothing to do with that dog and that is exactly why suspicion fell upon him, four accounts, three singing from the same hymn sheet whilst the 4th just lied and lied –
Position. Context and NOT just dog and wall whilst ignoring and avoiding like the plague the rest.
(Original post here)
The Victim Of Violent Rapist & Parasitic Predator Andrew Malkinson Aka Andrew Strugnell Is Ghosted (Part 18)
Someone called Falsely Accused? on Twitter, who has a link to a website called accused.co.uk tweeted the following on the 26th May 2023;
Dangerous sex offender Andrew Malkinson’s conviction(s) have been referred back to the court of appeal (CoA) on technicalities by the criminal cases review commission.
Therefore if the CoA deem his conviction(s) “unsafe” he will have indeed “got off with a technicality”!
Maybe Falsely Accused? will explain in another tweet how a minute speck of undated circumstantial DNA on a piece of clothing belonging to his victim would equate to his ‘innocence’ and erase all the other evidence pointing to forensically aware Andrew Malkinson;
Why violent rapist Andrew Malkinson went on the run from the area the day after it was made known his victim was helping police compile an E-Fit of him;
And also explain what happened to the clothing and footwear he wore to work as a security guard at Ellesmere shopping centre, Walkden;
And why in 2015/16 Andrew Malkinson claimed (via Bob Woffinden) his victim was never attacked and raped;
And why he still continues to get caught in the lie;
Killer Luke Mitchell: Partial Transcript of James Hunter & Alan Carrick From United SK8S Ltd Podcast & Gaslighter Sandra Lean On The “Weird” Story About The Note Through The Door, The Wee Saturday Girl & Her May 2023 Excuse For Why She Couldn’t Attend The Murderers November 2004 Trial (Part 219)
Did The Group From Work Who Went For A Drink After Work Include The Wee Teenager Who Worked On Saturdays?
The first warning bell sounded loud and clear one evening in a local pub. A group of us had gone for a drink after work and everyone was talking about the murder. I voiced my concerns and a spirited debate continued amongst me and my friends for the best part of an hour. A man, who had been sitting at the bar throughout, abruptly thumped his glass onto the bar and walked over to our table. He stood for a moment, ensuring everyone was aware of his presence, before bending towards me. “You’d better watch what you’re saying around here,” he growled, before straightening and walking out. We sat in silence for a few moments – there was no mistaking the threat. I was both upset and angry
Excerpts from Sandra Lean’s 2nd innocence fraud book IB (foot of page 18, top of page 19)
– my friends and I had had many debates regarding the murder, the investigation, the focus on the boyfriend and we were always willing to hear each other out and respect each other’s right to individual points of view. Until this point, none of us had ever been threatened for expressing our opinions.
It was to be the first of many. I became intimately involved in the case when Luke’s mother, whom I had never met, put a note through the door of the Natural Health Centre I ran, saying she had heard about my approach to the case and wondered if I could help her family
The Other Side Of This Case Has Been Hidden Away By Psychopathic Killer Luke Mitchell & His Gaslighting Enablers For Almost 20 Years
Sandra Lean was on a podcast in late May 2023 with Alan Carrick Aka Just Another Monkey and James Hunter Aka The Fly Fifer.
The following statements were made by Sandra Lean during the podcast;
It’s not difficult now to find out the other side of this case
It’s not, you know
Hidden away
Statements by Sandra Lean published on 28th May 2023 from 6:13 here
Sandra Lean Did Not Attend The Murderers Trial & Is Only Aware Of The Snippets Reported On By The Media & The Snippets She Has From The Killer & The SCCRC
Yeah, so, so that what the start of it
I knew nothing about the law for a start
Hadn’t, I had never had any dealings with the police, the criminal justice system
Nothing, I knew nothing about it
Erm and Corinne
It was a really weird story, so, so
In the natural health centre we had a, a teenager who helped out on a Saturday
Erm you know, she just
She was fascinated by, by what went on there
And she helped out on a Saturday
And it turned out that a relative of hers knew Corinne
So you know, we were, we were having this discussion in
Statements by Sandra Lean published on 28th May 2023 from 6:37 here
That’s Luke’s mum
Alan Carrick from United SK8S Ltd podcast
Yeah
We, we were having this conversation in the natural health centre
Between the therapists and thing
And of course you’ve got the, the, the
One side that, the guys gone
Sandra you’ve lost your mind
Like what are you talking about
Erm, and then this note comes through the door
It was a Saturday morning I’ll never forget it
Came in, opened up and this beautiful handwritten envelope
(Sandra Lean says quietly) What’s that
And opened it and it was a note from Luke’s mum
Saying I’ve heard what your take on this is
So, so, so
The wee Saturday girl had gone and said
And then they’d gone to Corinne and said
Erm can you help us
So of course the, the rest of the guys came in
And this letter got passed round
And they’re all going
Don’t get involved
Do not call that number
I knew the minute I picked it up I was gonna call it
And I’m saying to them
Yeah, you’re right it’s nothing to do with me
And then when everybody left I picked up the phone and called her
Erm, and that was how I got involved in the first place
Erm (Sandra clears her throat), meeting Luke for the first time
It was clear he was shell shocked
Now we’re a good few weeks down the line here
And he came in
Statements by Sandra Lean published on 28th May 2023
Right so you met him a way, was back then
Before he was even charged
Statements by Alan Carrick AKA Just Another Monkey published on 28th May 2023
Yeah, he came in
And, he, th, the head was slightly down
Because obviously was I friend or foe
Erm back then there was a 99% chance I was foe
Erm and then once, once we realised I was not foe
So polite
And, and everybody that knows him will, will say that
You know, he’s so well mannered
He’s so polite
And even in spite of what was going on at that stage
Not laid back but gentle
That’s the word I’m looking for, gentle
Erm, so fast forward
It’s now coming up towards the April
So, so Jodi’s funeral and all the nonsense with the Sky interview
Erm, where I mean that, that was a trick
And it was disgusting
That guy was asking Luke questions that a police would have had to ask under caution
And then they used it against him at trial
I mean it doesnae get dirtier than that
But you know we’ve got that first Christmas out the way
And we’re hearing things from the, the defence
Not the defence, there wasn’t a defence team then
Erm, but lawyers had got involved like
Because Luke couldn’t go back to school
And Stuff like that
And then I got one morning in the April to take the girls to school
Turned the radio on
A 45 year old woman, a 15 year old boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons has been arrested and charged with the murder of Jodi Jones
A 45 year old woman, and I can’t remember what age Shane was
Have also been remanded
And, I mean, you know
I’d been down to Corinne’s house
I’d been down to her business
I’m like what do I do
How do you get in touch with somebody who’s been arrested, you’re like
What do you do
I just had to wait until she called later that night
After she was, after Shane
Luke’s brother were released
And they’d kept Luke so
Statements by Sandra Lean published on 28th May 2023
Sandra Lean Makes No Mention Of The Other People Who Were Taken Into Custody On The 14th April 2004
Tap on the button below to read about a 14 year old girl (Now Woman) who claimed on Facebook; “CID came into my work on the day Luke got arrested took me away”
Sandra Lean Was A Self Employed Carer By The Time Of Killer Luke Mitchell’s November 2004 Trial
It has been claimed the reason Sandra Lean did not attend killer Luke Mitchell’s 2004 trial was because her sister and brother-in-law were in fear for Sandra’s daughters safety.
Sandra Lean told Alan Carrick and James Hunter the reason she did not attend the trial was because she could not “afford to close the business for 6 weeks”,
When, when
So, obviously fast forward and
We’re at the trial
Erm
And I couldn’t
Erm
Statements by Sandra Lean published on 28th May 2023 from around 16:58
I, I couldn’t go to the trial because I was running my own business
Erm and I, I couldnae afford to close the business for 6 weeks
Statements by Sandra Lean published on 28th May 2023 from around 19:06
Link to Part 220 here
Killer Luke Mitchell: Debunking Criminal Profiler Pat Brown’s Perceptions, Deception & Barmy, Child Like Tittle Tattle & Projections’s & False Allegations About Innocence Fraud Watch (Part 218)
21st May 2023 (3:11pm)
After watching and listening to a video by Pat Brown on charlatan and fraudster Sandra Lean and her 2nd innocence fraud book, Innocence Fraud Watch wrote and published a blog (published on the 21st May 2023 at 3:11pm) which can be read by tapping on the button below;
The blog (Part 215) was included in the ongoing blog series on sadistic teen killer Luke Mitchell and his abusive enablers fraudulent public relations campaign. The index for which can be found by tapping on the link below;
Innocence Fraud Watch tweeted a link to Part 215 of the ongoing blog series, which was subsequently retweeted by Roberta Glass from the True Crime Report.
Innocence Fraud Watch made a tweet underneath Roberta Glass’s tweet, indicating disappointment with Pat Brown for choosing to promote charlatan and fraudster Sandra Lean and her 2nd innocence fraud book.
Innocence Fraud Watch also tweeted to indicate the blog (Part 215) had been updated since it was first published
Pat Brown Stated (on 24th May 2023) “Erm and interesting enough the Innocence Fraud guy went after me on Twitter, viciously saying I had, I, I had fallen, you know to, to the attacks on me and that I wasn’t coming clean about eh Sandra Lean”
Innocence Fraud Watch Has Never Done A Podcast, Ever! So Why Did Pat Brown State “You listen to him and erm, eh and Roberta Glass had him on and they talk together and I made, and they say oh you just copy wha, Roberta Glass, and he said”?
Pat Brown “Not Exactly Handling Things Well”
Pat Brown Stated Of Innocence Fraud Watch (on 24th May 2023) “..And he did all these kind of, ah eh outrageous attacks on me”
22nd May 2023: Innocence Fraud Watch Published Part 216 Of The Blog Series After Listening To Sandra Lean’s Response Video To Pat Brown
Red Flags In Pat Brown’s “Argument Style”
Pat Brown Lied To Her YouTube Patron Hangout #90 Audience About Innocence Fraud Watch & Said Of The Following Polite Question “Erm he got so vicious I had to actually block him”
Pat Brown’s Garble
On the 24th May 2023 Pat Brown published her Patron Hangout #90 YouTube video.
Innocence Fraud Watch has transcribed Pat Brown’s video from around 28:25.
The following statements were made by Pat Brown;
Alright let me go on to, Sandra Lean (laugh) ‘cos this, this is quite amusing
Erm Sandra Lean
So anyway if anybody knows that I, erm, I, I did two videos
One was a video on eh
Did I believe that Luke Mitchell was innocent of the murder of Jodi and Mitchell
Eh he’s been in prison many, many years and there’s a whole free Luke Mitchell brigade out there
Eh Jodi Jones was murdered, she was a teenager, she was 14, she was murdered in Scotland
Erm and Jodi, eh Luke Mitchell was her boyfriend and he was supposed to be meeting her that day and the prosecution presented a case that Luke Mitchell met her and then killed her, and then covered it up
And he was convicted
Alright, eh but there’s a bunch of, a huge group out there wanting to free Luke Mitchell
And the leader of that group, at the, this point in time is, is erm, is eh
The woman’s name here is doctor Sandra Lean, she wrote this book innocent’s betrayed
Eh she, she worked 15 years on this case and she is totally of the belief that Luke Mitchell is innocent
And after I did my first video I got a lot of attacks from that side, that said you didn’t even bother to read her book
You just watched those two documentaries and read some crap online
Eh, there’s a, there’s a group, a guy called, runs a group called, eh I think it’s just him
Innocence Fraud
You listen to him and erm, eh and Roberta Glass had him on and they talk together and I made, and they say oh you just copy wha, Roberta Glass, and he said
Which is ridiculous because I never even watched that till after I did the video
Erm and interesting enough the Innocence Fraud guy went after me on Twitter, viciously saying I had, I, I had fallen, you know to, to the attacks on me and that I wasn’t coming clean about eh Sandra Lean
And he did all these kind of, ah eh outrageous attacks on me
And I’m like, I’m kinda on your side, so what the heck (laugh)
So what are you talking about
Erm he got so vicious I had to actually block him
So I’m gonna point out that, I wanna point out this very, very clearly
Sometimes you have a side that says he’s innocent and a side that’s says he guilty and both sides are not exactly handling things well
A lot of times they both talk garble
They both don’t present proper evidence because they’re both so emotional that they fail to do it on both sides
So (sigh), ya, ya you know, even if some, you know, I
Same thing happened with Madeleine McCann by the way
Erm I believe that Madeleine McCann died on the night that, while the parents were at, I believe the evidence supports, while the parents were at the tapas restaurant
Madeleine died.
That is what I believe the evidence most likely supports, that night
And yet there’s a whole bunch of people out there who think that
The McCann’s and all their friends, three days before, did something to Madeleine and she died
And they’re carrying around a fake Madeleine and they’re, and there’s a fake this and a fake that and there’s a fake picture
And I said that’s just nonsense
And I got massively attacked for that
And people who used to think I was a really great person
Suddenly said I was a horrible human being
And I was a complete failure as a profiler
These are people that basically believe that Madeleine McCann was not abducted
Yet they suddenly turned on me
And this is what happened with Innocence Fraud
They suddenly turned on me, being very nasty and I’m like, what the heck
You know, did you, did you watch the whole video, I eh
So anyway they’re over there doing their crazy stuff, Sandra Lean’s over here..
Statements by Pat Brown published on the 24th May 2023 from around 28:25 here
Pat Brown Does Not Appear To Have Recognised The Fact That Charlatan & Fraudster Sandra Lean Has Never Admitted She’s Been Wrong
Innocence Fraud Watch has also transcribed Pat Brown’s YouTube video headed Patron Hangout #90 from around 51:58.
The following statements were also published by Pat Brown on the 24th May 2023, where she is referring to charlatan and fraudster Sandra Lean;
Yes erm, she is big into the innocence stuff
Erm she, she, she goes gung-ho on innocence
What she believes people are innocent
She’s been wrong before
And again
Anybody can be wrong once or twice
And I’m not gonna
I, I don’t care if she was wrong before
What I care is (Pat Brown holds up Sandra Lean’s 2nd innocence fraud book IB)
At this point, she’s, she’s now (Pat Brown taps Sandra Lean’s book twice) come out with this book
And I don’t find her stuff valid
That’s my problem
I, I don’t care she messed up once before
So be it, I mean we all
But (sigh) this woman I just eh
You know, that’s, that my problem, a lot of red flags in the argument style
Erm (sigh) if she had presented a book with, with, with logical stuff in it
With, with proper supports
I might have said hey you know it was an unsafe conviction
Statements by Pat Brown published on the 24th May 2023 from around 51:58 here
Link to Part 219 here
Innocence Fraud Watch On Andrew Hammel & His II Part Quillette Article On The Wrongful Exoneration of Adnan Syed
On the 22nd May 2023 Quillette online magazine published a long read article written by Andrew Hammel, who apparently is “an American writer, translator, and lawyer living in Germany”.
Quillette’s about page here states in part;
Quillette is an Australian based online magazine that focuses on long-form analysis and cultural commentary.
We are politically non-partisan, but rely on reason, science, and humanism as our guiding values.
Andrew Hammel’s long read article was split into two Parts.
His first part was headed The Wrongful Exoneration of Adnan Syed Part I: A Straightforward Murder Case and can be read in full here.
His Part II was headed The Wrongful Exoneration of Adnan Syed Part II: The Legal and Media Circus and can be read in full here.
Hae Min Lee’s Killer Did NOT Have 23 Years Of “Excellent Prison Conduct”
Andrew Hammel stated here;
..you can check my work yourself (corrections gladly invited)
Andrew Hammel – 22nd May 2023 @ 9:57 AM
In Part II of Andrew Hammel’s long read he stated;
Few observers would have objected had a remorseful Adnan been released on parole after 23 years of excellent prison conduct.
Instead, he was freed based on his own false claims and the biased media coverage they generated.
Statements by Andrew Hammel from The Wrongful Exoneration of Adnan Syed Part II: The Legal and Media Circus here
Andrew Hammel had already stated in Part 1 of his article;
Adnan Syed adjusted well to prison. Over subsequent years, he operated an illicit business, acquired an illegal cell phone, and even married a woman named Kanda, whom he presented with a $10,000 dowry (the marriage didn’t last). None of this is particularly damning. Maryland’s prisons were notoriously lax at that time, and any enterprising convict would have followed Adnan’s path. In all other respects, Adnan was a model prisoner.
Statements by Andrew Hammel from The Wrongful Exoneration of Adnan Syed Part I: A Straightforward Murder Case
In reality Andrew Hammel does not know exactly what the killer got up to behind bars in those 23 years.
And operating an illicit business and acquiring an illegal cell phone can hardly be referred to as model prisoner behaviour and means the killer did NOT have “23 years of excellent prison conduct”!
Plus there could have been other criminal behaviours that the public were not made aware of, so it’s disingenuous of Andrew Hammel to claim he had “23 years of excellent prison conduct”.
Innocence Fraud Watch Questioned Andrew Hammel On His Latter Statement From His Part II
Young Lee Was Hustled
There is no doubt that journalists and the media gave a lot of attention to Hae Min Lee’s killer and in turn his conviction(s) but journalists, the media and Hae Min Lee’s killer played no part in his “wrongful exoneration” as Andrew Hammel claimed.
In September 2022, the State of Maryland; Marilyn Mosby and her office which included Becky Feldman, moved to vacate the killers conviction(s).
And as stated here;
Two days after the State’s motion was filed, the Court apparently conducted an in-
Chambers “meeting” at which counsel for all parties were present and at which the motion was discussed.Mr. Lee was not notified of this proceeding, had no opportunity to attend or to be heard
Source here
at the proceeding.
Lawyers Freed Hae Min Lee’s Killer NOT The Media Or The Murderers Countless False Claims
It was Marilyn Mosby who dropped the changes against Hae Min Lee’s killer, claiming in October 2022;
There is no appeal.
It’s moot.
The case is over
Marilyn Mosby (reported here)
And it was associate judge Melissa Phinn (a lawyer) who made the decision to ”wrongly exonerate” and release Hae Min Lee’s killer from custody.
THE FIX IS IN! Greater Manchester Police & The Crown Prosecution Service Roll Over To The Spin Campaign Of Violent Rapist & Sex Offender Andrew Malkinson & His Enablers (Part 17)
In her article today (24th May 2023) for the Guardian here on violent rapist Andrew Malkinson, who was known as Andrew Strugnell up until his early twenties when he learned he was adopted, Emily Dugan stated;
Until this week it was thought that Greater Manchester police (GMP) and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) might contest the case, but they said the DNA breakthrough meant they no longer considered Malkinson’s conviction safe.
Emily Dugan – 24th May 2023 here
It is in the interests of the CPS and GMP for any mistakes that may have led to a potential miscarriage of justice not to be investigated further.
There is no evidence of any mistakes that could suggest someone else was responsible for Andrew Malkinson’s rape on the 19th July 2003 near Little Hulton, Salford, Greater Manchester.
A minute trace of undated, circumstantial DNA found on a piece of clothing worn by the victim in this case does not erase all the other evidence which points to Andrew Malkinson and only Andrew Malkinson.
Some of the evidence that led to Andrew Malkinson’s convictions has been explored in this blog series, the index for which can be found by tapping on the link below;
Link to Part 18 here
Killer Luke Mitchell: Gossip & Conspirator Tom Halliday, Fraudster Scott Forbes, Lazy Reporter Iona Young & The 2022 Spin On The Knife In The Skip From 2003 (Part 217)
In August 2003 the Guardian reported here
Police hunting the killer of Midlothian teenager Jodi Jones are carrying out forensic tests on a knife discovered in skip near where her body was found
The article also stated that the knife was “found by a member of the public in Newtongrange”
The member of the public in question appears to have been Tom Halliday, who yesterday (23rd May 2023) made the following tweet;
Tom Halliday foolishly communicated with pretend lawyer Scott Forbes, who then seemingly spoke to Douglas Walker at the Scottish Sun.
Iona Young at Edinburgh live then appears to have written and published her 21st of November 2022 article off the back of Douglas Walkers.
Iona Young stated of Tom Halliday;
The car mechanic is now speaking out now after recently finding out the blade was not even submitted as evidence during the trial of Luke Mitchell, who was convicted of killing his girlfriend. The weapon used in Jodi’s slaying has never been found.
Iona Young for Edinburgh Live article headed Midlothian car mechanic claims he found knife in a skip near where schoolgirl Jodi Jones died dated 21st November 2022
As already stated in Part 130 of this bog series (which can be read by tapping on the button below) the reason “the blade was not even submitted as evidence during the trial” was because the test results clearly did not yield anything of any value!
Tom Halliday stated in November 2022;
When I learned it wasn’t documented, it raised my suspicions the police may have tried to conceal the discovery
Tom Halliday – November 2022
Again, not only was the knife Tom Halliday spoke to fraudster Scott Forbes about documented, and reported on by Kirsty Scott for the Guardian in August 2003.
The knife was forensically examined in 2003 and the results of those tests yielded nothing of any value.
What point could the defence have made during the trial about a random knife found in a skip?
What They Found has recently published a video on the November 2022 spin on knife in the skip;
Link to Part 218 here
YouTube VIDEO: Killin’ time 3 – Luke Mitchell, teen killer! By What They Found
YouTube Video: Killin’ Time 2 – Luke Mitchell, teen killer! By What They Found
INNOCENCE FRAUD WATCH 