Category: Deviance

Self Confessed Train Robber Bert Kreischer & Innocence Fraudster & Psychopath Amanda Knox On Rudy Guede & Their Meeting On The Bottom Floor Downstairs In The Four Guys Apartment, The Weekend Of 20th/21st October 2007, Shamrocks Bar, Red Zone Nightclub, DJ Quentin Harris & The 5 Cannabis Plants

Shamrocks & Red Zone Nightclub – Amanda Knox Met Rudy Guede Before She Met Raffaele Sollecito

According to the evidence, Amanda Knox met Rudy Guede before she met Raffaele Sollecito.

On Saturday the 20th October 2007 Meredith Kercher was in a bar called Shamrocks with her British friends watching the rugby World Cup final between England and South Africa

After the match Meredith Kercher and one of her British friends, along with Amanda Knox all went to the Red Zone night club just outside of Perugia along with Marco Marzan and Giacomo Silenzi (who lived downstairs).

A DJ from New York called Quentin Harris was spinning that evening, as can be seen and heard in the following videos taken on that night;

Rudy Guede had been in Shamrocks and had apparently seen Meredith Kercher and according to his prison diary, while the others were at the club, he had stopped by their house to visit but found nobody at home.

The following night, Sunday the 21st October 2007, Rudy Guede had visited by the four guy’s place downstairs for the Formula 1 Grand Prix, and he found out from Giacomo Silenzi that everyone had been at the Red Zone night club.

Rudy Guede claimed in his prison diary here;

So then I went to “Le Chic” to ask about Amanda, maybe she knew where they went, but she wasn’t there.

So then I figured that she was with the guys, going out with the hanging around in the center of town.

It was Saturday others. Meanwhile I went with my usual friends, that evening.

The next day, Sunday, I went to the guys’ house and found them.

I told them that I ‘d tried, but couldn’t find them the day before, that I‘d gotten to their house late, etc., etc., then that I hadn’t seen them in the town center, and that I’d gone to “Le Chic” to ask about them and Amanda, but not even she was there.

And they told me that they’d gone after dinner to “The Red Zone”

Rudy Guede

Meredith Kercher’s Boyfriend Giacomo Silenzi’s Testimony

The relationship between Meredith Kercher and Giacomo Silenzi began following their night out at the Red Zone club.

An excerpt from Giacomo Silenzi’s testimony reads;

Rudy had asked information about Amanda because he was interested

Excerpt from Giacomo Silenzi‘s testimony – Source here

When Giacomo was asked “All there, where in the house?” he stated;

We were all in front of a pub in the center

Excerpt from Giacomo Silenzi‘s testimony – Source here

Amanda Knox met Raffaele (Raf) Sollecito on the 25th October 2007

Excerpts from a February 2009 article headed Flatmate saw scratch on Knox’s neck soon after Kercher killing read;

Silenzi, a Perugia University student, lived with three other Italian men in the basement flat below the house Knox and Kercher shared.

Silenzi said he and his flatmates were growing five cannabis plants in their flat and had started smoking joints with their four female upstairs neighbours.

When he went home for the Italian public holiday on 1 November, Silenzi asked Kercher to water the plants for him.

Silenzi and his flatmates also entertained Guede at the downstairs flat twice in October after meeting him while playing basketball on a public court near the house.

Excerpts from a Guardian article by Tom Kingston headed Flatmate saw scratch on Knox’s neck soon after Kercher killing dated 15th February 2009

Beautiful & Innocent Meredith Kercher

Excerpts from an April 2012 article read;

Murder victim Meredith Kercher’s Italian boyfriend told yesterday of the moment he first feared Amanda Knox was her killer.

Giacomo Silenzi, 22, had been dating Meredith, 21, for just ten days when she was found semi-naked with her throat cut in the bedroom of student digs she shared with American Knox, 20.

Speaking publicly for the first time, Giacomo, who described Meredith, from London, as “beautiful and innocent”, said that he first feared Knox was the killer as they waited to be questioned by police.

He told The Mail on Sunday how he and Knox were taken to Perugia police station to be interviewed on Friday, November 2, the day Meredith’s body was found.

It was here he also met her co-accused, Raffaele Sollecito, 23.

Giacomo said:

“I was on the train heading back to Perugia from my parents’ house when I got a call from Meredith’s other flatmate Filomena, who told me what had happened.

“My stomach dropped – I just could not believe it. I had spoken with her for the last time just a couple of days earlier and she had sent me a text saying she was looking forward to me coming back.

“When I got to Perugia station, the police picked me up and took me to the police station.

“I had a cast-iron alibi because I had been at my parents’ house since the Monday – it was a bank holiday in Italy. I was taken to a waiting room and Amanda was there.

“She hugged me and said how sorry she was. Then she introduced me to her boyfriend Raffaele. I had never met him before.

“I couldn’t help thinking how cool and calm Amanda was. Meredith’s other English friends were devastated and I was upset, but Amanda was as cool as anything and completely emotionless.

“Her eyes didn’t seem to show any sadness and I remember wondering if she could have been involved.

“I spoke with her English friends Robyn [Butterworth] and Sophie [Purton] afterwards, and they said the same thing. None of us could quite understand how she was taking it all so calmly.

“I knew that Amanda didn’t get on with Meredith, but I didn’t think that would lead to Amanda killing her.

Holding back tears, Giacomo said:

“Meredith was a beautiful and innocent girl. We had only just started our relationship and maybe it was too early to talk about love, but we really had an affection for each other.

“She moved into the flat above mine at the end of the summer and we would pop into each other’s places just to say hello or have a cup of coffee, the things that neighbours do.

“She was very pretty and I was also impressed with her Italian. We would share CDs and play music together.

“It was my birthday at the end of September but she couldn’t make my party because she was flying back to England for the weekend.

“She gave me a bottle of rum as a present. Most of it was drunk at the party but there is a drop left that I will now keep for ever”

Giacomo added:

“It was a few weeks after that, around the middle of October-that we kissed for the first time at a student party. Then we made love a couple of days later in my flat.

“I’m still having trouble taking this all in. If I could see Amanda, I would just ask her, ‘Why? Why did she kill Meredith?’

Excerpts from an Evening Standard article headed Meredith’s boyfriend reveals the moment he suspected Foxy Knoxy had killed his lover dated 12th April 2012

Self Confessed Train Robber Bert Kreischer & Innocence Fraudster Amanda Knox

On the 10th December 2021 Bert Kreischer spoke to psychopath Amanda Knox about Rudy Guede.

According to Amanda Knox’s book Waiting to be heard, she met someone called Bobby aka Daniel de Luna over the weekend of 20th/21st October 2007.

Daniel de Luna was a friend of the men who lived downstairs.

Amanda Knox stated;

This was the first time I’d invited a guy into my bed since I arrived in Perugia.

We went to my room and had sex, then we both passed out

Amanda Knox

Two nights after Amanda and Raf got involved, she hooked up once more with Daniel de Luna, the friend of the neighbours downstairs, and later included him on the list of sex partners in her prison diary

Excerpt from Barbie Latza Nadeau’s book Angel Face (published in 2010)

Below is a transcribe taken from Bertcast #495 Amanda Knox & ME, beginning from approximately 15:26, where Amanda Knox was seemingly referring to Sunday the 21st October 2007;

This was the guy Rudy

Bert Kriescher (from around 15:26 of Bertcast #495 Amanda Knox & ME)

Yeah Rudy Guede

Amanda Knox

So Rudy

This is another thing I , I don’t think I ever really wrapped my head round

Ru, you guys met Rudy

Let me, let me start from the beginning

So, ‘cos Rudy had come down and like hung out at your house a couple of times right

Bert Kreischer

So Rudy Guede was eh a local

Erm he played basketball

Like did sort of pick up basketball

With erm

In the local like basketball court that was in front of the university

And that was really near by my house

So the guys that lived in the apartment downstairs from us often would play basketball with him

Like pick-up games

Amanda Knox

And those were like two law students right

Bert Kreischer

So no

So the two law students that you’re thinking of are the other two room mates that I had besides Meredith

Amanda Knox

Okay

Bert Kreischer

Those are two Italian women

Amanda Knox

Oh, oh okay

I thought those were dudes

I must have clumped them in

Okay

Yeah

Bert Kreischer

Yeah

So we lived on the top floor of a house

And on the bottom floor there lived four guys

And they were all just doing their thing

Eh it was a separate apartment situation

But we would occasionally go out to dinner together

Or like go out to a club together

Like, it just

You know, household dynamics

But they would go and play basketball

And have pick up games with whoever was there

Including Rudy Guede

And occasionally those people would come over to their house

And one time Rudy Guede came to their house

And they invited us to come downstairs

And that’s when we met Rudy Guede

Amanda Knox

And Rudy, kind of

If I’m not mistaken

He had a crush on you

Bert Kreischer

That’s what they say

I don, I didn’t know that

Apparently after we went and like hung out with them for a few minutes

They were

They sort of

After a while me and Meredith just went back upstairs

It was time to go to bed

And afterwards it was when they were sort of talking about us

And Giacomo one of the guys downstairs had a crush on Meredith

So I’m sure that they brought that up

And maybe Rudy Guede said something about me

That’s at least what was said

When I, I was on trial

But no one ever told me that

I didn’t even actually know his name until I was already arrested

Amanda Knox

Really

Bert Kreischer

Yeah

Amanda Knox

Roberta Glass Goes Over Peter Hyatt’s Statement Analysis & A Transcript Of Curt Knox’s 20th November 2007 Capanne Prison Visit Referring To Rudy Guede

Roberta Glass from the Roberta Glass True Crime Report has a new 2023 series on Amanda Knox, which can be found by tapping on the button below;

Roberta Glass’s New 2023 Series On Amanda Knox

Roberta’s two YouTube videos below go over Amanda Knox’s evidence regarding her and Rudy Guede and are worth watching and listening to.

At around 48:00 of Roberta Glass’s video Amanda Knox Changes Her Story Again! (below), Roberta goes over Peter Hyatt’s statement analysis of Amanda’s statement regarding a shower she said she had with Raffaele Sollecito and how they “..had a shower and we washed ourselves for a long time” and that Raffaele “cleaned my ears, he dried and combed my hair”;

Previous Blogs Including Amanda Knox & The Cult Like “Wrongful Conviction” Movement

Tap on the buttons below to read previous blogs which refer to Amanda Knox;

Killer Luke Mitchell: ‘Pro Knox Woman’ Michelle Moore Moderator For Cult-Like Sadistic & Psychopath Killer’s Facebook Group (Part 82)
Killer Luke Mitchell: Naive Killer Cult-Like Follower Sharon Indy Sunshine & Her Myths & Projections About Amanda Knox (Part 104)

The Wrongful Exoneration Of Adnan Syed Feat. Andrew Hammel

TOMORROW (24th June 2023) AT NOON (ET)

Roberta Glass of the Roberta Glass True Crime Report will be chatting LIVE with “inactive” lawyer, and writer Andrew Hammel on his 2 part Quillette article headed “The Wrongful Exoneration of Adnan Syed”

Killer Luke Mitchell: Welsh Murderer Michael (Mike) O’Brien, “Patron” To Mass Murderer, Child Killer, Rapist & Coercive Controller Jeremy Bamber’s Innocence Fraud Spin Campaign, Jumps On Board The Scottish Killers Gravy Train Scam (Part 225)

Welsh murderer Michael (Mike) O’Brien, who has failed to ever prove his actual, factual innocence has recently come out in support of the sadistic and psychopathic murderer Luke Mitchell.

Phillip Saunders (52)

Phillip Saunders was murdered on the 12th October 1987 by Michael O’Brien and his brother in-law Ellis Sherwood, whilst their friend Darren Hall kept look-out.

Sandra Lean referred to Mike O’Brien during a recent live video, which can be listened to below;

The following was posted today (18th June 2023) on one on the social media innocence fraud Facebook pages.

NOTE how killer Michael O’Brien stated “I proved my innocence at the court of appeal in 2000”.

This was and is a bare faced lie!


Michael O’Brien

The following comments were made underneath the above Facebook post;

The “official” innocence fraud Facebook group also shared killer Michael O’Brien’s nonsense, which both he and Sandra Lean commented on;

Link to Part 226 here

The Release Of Adnan Syed: Don’t Call It A Fraud!

*LIVE* Roberta Glass reacts to Andrew Hammel on Jason Whitlock’s channel.. Read more here

TAP HERE 4 Hae Min Lee’s Psychopathic Killer Adnan Syed & His & His Enablers Innocence Fraud Gravy Train Scam

TAP HERE 4 Hae Min Lee’s Killer’s Murder Conviction Magically Disappears

INNOCENCE FRAUD: Rebranding The Guilty As Innocent (Part 1)

This is the first part of an interview Roberta Glass gave her Ghislaine Maxwell trial buddy Nadia for her substack. Subscribe to “The Offbeat Effect” here

The Idaho Murders: Portrait of A Psychopath

Roberta Glass joins William Ramsey on his podcast “William Ramsey Investigates” to discuss the Idaho Murders and the psychopath accused of committing the murder of Ethan Chapin, Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen and Xana Kernodle

Killer Luke Mitchell & Malignant Narcissist Sandra Lean’s Killer Cult (Part 118)

Sandra Lean

Dan Neuharth wrote and published an article in March 2017 headed;

‘14 Ways Narcissists Can Be Like Cult Leaders’

Below are excerpts from Dan Neuharth’s article and are relevant to psychopathic killer Luke Mitchell and innocence fraud pusher Sandra Lean;

The tactics some narcissists use to get their way in personal relationships can be strikingly similar to the coercive tactics used by destructive cult leaders.

If you have a spouse, family member, friend, or boss who is narcissistic, ask yourself whether any of the following 14 characteristics of destructive cults parallel your relationship with the narcissist.

1. Cult leaders act larger than life. They are viewed as innately good, possessing special wisdom, answerable to no one, with no one above them.

2. Cult members rights are subjugated for the good of the group, leader, or cause. Members are told that what the cult wants them to do is for their own good, even if it is self-destructive.

3. An Us vs. Them attitude prevails.Outsiders are viewed as dangerous or enemies. This turns members focus outward, reducing the chances they will spot problems within the cult. In addition, viewing others as enemies is used to justify extreme actions because of thedangers outsiders pose.

4. The leader or cause becomes all-important. Members devote inordinate amounts of time to the leader and group, leaving little time for self-care or reflection.

5. Feelings are devalued, minimized, or manipulated. Shame, guilt, coercion, and appeals to fear keep members in line. Members are led to discount their instincts and intuition and told to seek answers from the leader or cult’s teachings. Overtime, members can lose touch with their previous habits and values.

6. Questioning and dissent are not tolerated. Having doubts about the leader or cult is considered shameful or sinful. Members are told that doubts or dissent indicate something wrong with the member.

7. The ends justify the means. The rightness of the leader and cult justifies behavior that violates most peoples standards for ethics and honesty. In the zealotry of the cult, anything goes.

8. Closeness to the cult and leader is rewarded while distance is punished. Temporary ostracism is used to punish behavior that doesnt conform to group rules. Members fear being estranged from the group and losing their identities and the benefits of group membership.

9. Cult members are on an endless treadmill of becoming. Only the cult leader is considered perfect. All other members must strive to emulate the leader. Most cults are set up so that members can never achieve this perfection, which keeps them dependent.

10. Lies are repeated so often they seem true. The cult leader cannot be wrong and never needs to apologize.

11. Cult leaders enrich themselves at members expense. Members are encouraged or coerced into gratifying the leaders needs by giving up time, money, and more.

12. Communication is coercive or deceptive. Things are not always what they seem. This fosters confusion, leaving members vulnerable. When confused, they seek solace from the aura of certainty the leader seems to possess.

13. Sameness is encouraged. Certain kinds of appearance, behavior, and cult terms and language become the norm for members. Over time, members come to identify themselves as part of an entity rather than as individuals.

14. Doing what the leader wants is presented as the path to enlightenment or happiness. In time, this leads members to give up their old habits and norms. They live in a bubble, filtering out information that might weaken their resolve. Read more here

Link to Part 119 here

Killer Luke Mitchell: Midlothians Pretend Criminologist Sandra Lean & Her Word Play (Part 88)

*Guest Blog*

Ok, so can you prove to me that the first statements of the “search trio” did NOT agree with Luke’s, ie that they NEVER said that the dog played any part in finding Jodi?

I do not believe there is anything that could be shown, that would set your mind on a different path. You have already stated, that you hold complete trust in what Sandra Lean writes. And that is absolutely fine.

I for one, would not attempt in the slightest to sway peoples opinion, on their beliefs and trust of others.

I am not set to change peoples minds. I am putting forward what I know of the Crowns case, of information gathered from different sources.

You asked me If I could show you, that these first statements gave no indication that this search trio, implied that they agreed with Luke Mitchell, in that his dog had led them to Jodi.

You have readily accepted from Sandra Lean, all that she implies – that she has not backed this up by way of showing clearly what this search party said.

Not produced those statements. 

And of other posts I have also made on this. That one would not need to go to extraordinary lengths, when the simplest route would be to show this clearly from those statements. –

And that is fine. I can not produce those statements, Sandra Lean could show enough, to show clearly that they agreed.

That it is my belief firmly, that by way of omitting crucial areas of statements. that what is being implied is not what has been said or meant, from these witnesses. 

You believe that this search trio all said they were some 40t down, that the dog alerted them to where Jodi was.

You believe that this search party told the truth, changed their minds and lied. And that in those first statements they obviously both lied and told the truth at the same time?

The truthful part has to be that they were with Luke Mitchell and his dog, some distance passed this V break.

The lies they told in those first statements have to be – everything they made reference to at this V.

As we know, that this search trio could not have seen the dogs head level with the V, they could not have seen the dog pulling at the V and they could not have seen the lead being handed to Alice Walker.

So whichever way you look at it – they were lying in those first statements. It being an impossible task to see this V from 40ft down, even 20ft down – more so, that if they carried on walking whilst Luke had returned to this V to go over.

And there is no need for Sandra Lean to make reference to Janine Jones height, for according to her and Luke Mitchell, Janine Jones was not at this V anyway. –

She was at this point some 80ft down from it.

For Luke Mitchell had to return around this 40ft and they would have covered around the same distance?

Or do we go down this route, yet again that Luke Mitchell was simply mistaken That he had not walked “not even 20yrds” yet this mistake was clarified when he drew that diagram, parallel to where Jodi lay on the other side.

That perhaps he was just enough to the left of this V that gave him cause to walk left?

Do we bring him right back to this V? so we can include the search party being truthful to match his account? As Faithlilly tried to do? When she implied they all went back to the V after the dog reacted? All this implying?

All this Sandra Lean trying to work out, how it could all fit in with Luke Mitchell’s account – and is not that the problem?

It should be shown, clearly and precisely from those statements. Of course, one has the other option, (lots of them rather than Occams Razor) That Luke simply followed their direction to feel safe? ?

Best stick to what we do believe –

I for one believe this search trio were nothing other than truthful. Does one take the word of Jodi’s family over this boy who we know, without a shadow of doubt is a compulsive liar.

Do we take the word of the police, the witness’s over someone who is acting on behalf of this compulsive liar –

I know who I choose. More so when one has witnessed this person lying.

TAP HERE 4 The Never Ending Lies & Duplicity Of Charlatan Sandra Lean & Her Involvement With Sexual Deviant & Murderer Matthew Hamlen

I first started to study this case, for that very reason. Drawn by those lies, of those claims of seeking ‘Truth and Justice‘ – by way of persuasion, that power of suggestion.

And that word play – the mockery of each and every person – who should speak up for the Crown, for our Justice system. Who do get it wrong.

There is nothing in this case, to date to show that they did.

The more I looked into this case, the finer the details that became known around this investigation and subsequent conviction.

And of that question I used as a base, of “why suspicion fell upon Luke Mitchell and why he could not be eliminated” 

And I am and have frequently been guilty of what I accuse others of – of word play and mockery.

For in some areas, I find it extremely hard to digest, how people could possibly believe that this case was based upon flimsy evidence. That Luke Mitchell was fitted up and of tunnel vision.

The evidence speaks for itself. IMO, most of it from the Mitchells themselves.

They were the base of the suspicion first and foremost. 

And I will not be bullied by others, by means of taking some high and mighty stance. That they somehow are better, more knowledgeable, as in their hands, they claim to have all of the evidence? –

They have, in reality a mere fraction of what must have went into this investigation.

And using 5% proves nothing, it only highlights just how much is in that missing 95%. 

And when I speak of intellect and my mockery of it – you are not included, this is only aimed at those who cried guilty upon tabloid trash and now cry innocence by the very same means used.

That they are not interested in the slightest in the actual case, for if they were they would not simply take the word of anyone.

And when I talk of common sense – it is from that very same angle.

That it is only common sense to realise, that if someone is pushing out a complete biased case of defence – then there is naturally a hell of lot more to show this to be wrong – that missing 95%

(Original forum post here)

Link to Part 89 here

Hae Min Lee’s Killers Murder Conviction(s) Magically Disappears

Hae Min Lee

Roberta Glass @RobertaGlassPod Speaks To Martin Prieb @thewatch42 & Sean Fitzgerald @IamSean90 About #AdnanSyed’s & His Enablers #InnocenceFraud

Roberta Glass @RobertaGlassPod

Martin Preib is a Chicago writer and cop. His first book, The Wagon and Other Stories from the City, was published by the University of Chicago Press.

In 2006, he began investigating wrongful conviction cases in Chicago and determined that many of these exonerations were false. His work led to undermining the most influential wrongful conviction case in the state’s history, chronicled in his second book Crooked City.

In this, his second book about a Chicago murder case in which an offender walked out of death row, award-winning writer and police officer Martin Preib documents his journey from doubt to certainty that the offender in this case should not have been released from prison.

Preib’s earlier book, Crooked City, undermined the central so-called “wrongful conviction” case that was seminal in generating an industry in Illinois aimed at overturning convictions. Now Preib moves beyond that case to the Madison Hobley arson, meticulously unraveling, strand by strand, the convoluted tapestry of Chicago’s corruption that led to a 2003 pardon of Hobley by Illinois Governor George Ryan, allowing Hobley to walk free from the 1987 arson on Chicago’s South Side that left seven people dead, including his own wife and child

In this second collection of connected essays, Chicago cop Martin Preib takes on seemingly unrelated murder cases, all dating from one year, 1982, including some in which offenders were released as part of the wrongful conviction movement. 

This book shatters reader assumptions—about the workings of justice, the objectivity of the media, and the role of the police in the city of Chicago, even calling into question allegations of police torture in the notorious cases against Jon Burge.

Excerpts from the Crooked City Blog here

Hae Min Lee’s Psychopathic Killer Adnan Syed & His & His Enablers Innocence Fraud Gravy Train Scam

Hae Min Lee

19th September 2022

The family of Hae Min Lee released a statement, reminding the public that they still believe Adnan Syed to be guilty.

Unlike those who learn about this case on the internet, we sat and watched every day of both trials – so many witnesses, so much evidence..

The Lee family

2016

…the beautiful blossoming song of Hae Min Lee was silenced forever, by Adnan Syed

The Lee family
Sean Fitzgerald (Actual Justice Warrior)
@IamSean90
Sean Fitzgerald (Actual Justice Warrior)
@IamSean90
Sean Fitzgerald (Actual Justice Warrior)
@IamSean90
Roberta Glass @RobertaGlassPod
Roberta Glass @RobertaGlassPod
Roberta Glass @RobertaGlassPod
Roberta Glass @RobertaGlassPod

How Serial & Sarah Koenig Have Fooled Everyone – Link 👇

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NoTI6qNvhlQ&list=PLZCroaJ4oThDlIK-jKcqIf1yfNnpxxnA4&index=4

Roberta Glass @RobertaGlassPod