During the video killer Sean Toal and Scott Forbes told many outrageous lies.
The following is some dialogue between the pair of innocence fraudsters;
So the police are now driving people about
They’ve been over the wall of a crime scene
Come on anybody with any..
Scott Forbes
Is this the local police then
Sean Toal
Aye started off with the local police and then Dobbie and that arrived
He was a detective superintendent for Edinburgh
Scott Forbes
But this time the place have already let..
Sean Toal
Aye they’ve allowed people to go home covered in Jodi’s blood
Scott Forbes
And what was Dobbie’s answer to that
Sean Toal
Ah he just says ach we’ve carri.. our investigation was the finest police work that we’ve ever carried out
Scott Forbes
So there’s people there that have been involved in finding the body
They’re covered in blood
They don’t get questioned
They get drove about Dalkeith and then they pick on Luke
Sean Toal
Detective chief superintendent Craig Dobbie was not appointed as senior investigating officer until gone 03:00hrs, by which time all the family members had left the scene.
And no one was “covered in blood” like killer Sean Toal stated!
This is another intentional bare faced lie!
Alice Walker was the only person to have gone near her grand-daughter Jodi Jones’ body and Alice had said she might have touched her grand-daughters forehead.
The intentional bare faced lie about Alice Walker “cradling” her grand-daughter body was started by sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell!
Janine Jones, Steven Kelly and Alice Walker were driven directly to Newbattle police station, they were not “droveabout” Dalkeith like killer Sean Toal stated and they didn’t go home until after they had been at the police station – where they were asked questions.
Pages 806 and 807 of Janine Jones’ trial testimony describes some of what happened in the early hours of the morning of 1st July 2003;
Tap on the button below to read more, directly from trial transcripts;
Scammer Sandra Lean and her former boyfriend, un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton were involved in killer Sean Toal’s public relations innocence fraud spin campaign:
In reality – killers Sean Toal and Luke Mitchell had been cohorts since at least 2010.
Sandra Lean has remained (publicly) silent since her bare faced lies, disinformation and misinformation are being exposed by trial transcripts but she recently commented on murderer Sean Toal on Facebook;
Nicola Brennan, who was referred to in Part 296here commented on Sandra’s post;
Whilst over on X Heather Brunt, who was referred to in Part 288here also tweeted on killer Sean Toal – commenting on how fraudster Scott Forbes “worked on his case”;
Tap on the button below to read more about fraudster Scott Forbes;
Killer Sean Toal also refers to himself as Social Sessions on various social media platforms, as well as @seanaldo1985 on X.
Social Sessions tweeted Neil MacKay on the 4th December 2023;
Neil MacKay was involved in the fraudulent 2021 channel 5 TV show Murder In A Small Town. Neil MacKay was referred to in Parts 261 and 265 of this ongoing blog series, both of which can be read by tapping on the buttons below;
On the 7th December 2023 killer Sean Toal asked John Halley to message him.
John Halley was arrested in March 2023 for sex offences (Read more here) and had also been promoting scammer Sandra Lean’s nonsense on social media, although he too has recently gone quiet on this.
Again – since trial transcripts have been published, Sandra Lean has remained silent
Tap on the button below for links to trial transcripts;
On the 26th of April 1999 Jill Dando (37) was murdered by sexual predator, serial stalker, rapist and assassin Barry George.
Barry George shot Jill Dando whilst she was on the doorstep of her home in Gowan avenue Fulham, which is in Southwest London.
A jury found Barry George guilty of his murder on the 2nd July 2001.
Not long after Barry George was found guilty, he confessed to his murder in 2002.
In the same year he confessed to his murder, Barry George appealed his conviction but his appeal was dismissed.
However on the 20th June 2007 the fraudsters at the criminal cases review commission referred Barry George’s murder conviction to the court of appeal.
The court of appeal went on to deem Barry George’s murder conviction “unsafe” and ordered a re-trial.
On the 9th June 2008 he stood trial for a second time and on the 1st August 2008 Barry George was found not guilty.
A not guilty verdict does not equate to actual, factual innocence.
Less than two years after they referred killer Barry George’s murder conviction to the court of appeal, the fraudsters at the criminal cases review commission referred the murder conviction of killer Simon Hall.
Michael Mansfield, who first represented killer Barry George during his appeal also represented killer Simon Hall.
Fibre evidence, which was one of the factors which helped convict killer Simon Hall, still links Barry George to his murder.
Gun shot residue matching the gunshot residue found at Barry George’s crime scene also still links him to his murder.
Michael Naughton
Michael Naughton, who campaigned for and represented killer Simon Hall when their innocence fraud was exposed in 2012/13, went on to write the foreword of killer Barry George’s sister’s book.
Michelle Diskin Bates
Michelle Diskin Bates, who appears to be a deluded fantasist similar to her killer brother, has gone on to align herself with numerous other dangerous murderers, including mass murderer, child killer and rapist Jeremy Bamber.
In August 2016 liar and fantasist Michelle Diskin Bates made the claim she was watching nighttime TV back in August 1985 – even though nighttime TV did not exist in the UK until 1986.
It was well after midnight on August 6th 1985 and I couldn’t sleep. Switching on the T.V., I absent-mindedly tuned into a news channel. We were living in Co. Cork, in Southern Ireland, and I was joyfully awaiting the birth of our first child who was already overdue, making me feel restless; that was why I was up and about at such an hour.
Becoming aware of a breaking-news story I began to listen in more closely. A siege was taking place at a farmhouse in England. The broadcaster relayed that five people were inside and there was great fear for their safety. As the story unfolded it became apparent that this was an older couple. A farmer and retired Magistrate, Nevill Bamber and his wife, June; their daughter, Sheila, and her six year old twin sons. Jeremy, their son, was outside with police who were trying to communicate with someone inside the house who had been seen pacing back and forth in front of an upstairs window and carrying a firearm. The reporter said that police were reluctant to get too close to the house for fear of causing that person to become more agitated, thereby, escalating the danger to the family. I watched for an hour or so but there was no resolution and, heavily pregnant, I became exhausted and had to go off to bed
Michelle Diskin Bates
When Barry George was released from custody, following his 2008 re-trial, he was placed under MAPPA (multi-agency public protection arrangements) restrictions due to his dangerousness, especially towards women.
On the 2nd February 2023 Bill Robertson, who says he has apparently “researched alleged miscarriages of justice for around 20 years” had a blog published on Michael Naughton’s “CCRC Watch” website page.
Michael Naughton was involved in the innocence fraud phenomenon scam of self-confessed killer Simon Hall.
Tap on the button below to read more about actual, factual guilty killer Simon Hall and his deceitful enablers;
The title of Bill Robertson’s blog was and is as follows;
Bill Robertson is involved with mass murderer, child killer, rapist and coercive controller Jeremy Bamber’s innocence fraud public relations spin campaign.
Violent Rapist Andrew Malkinson Described As Being “Forensically Aware”
Convicted rapist and passport fraudster Andrew Malkinson, originally from Grimsby, attacked his victim in the early hours of 19th July 2003.
He was subsequently found guilty for his crimes at Manchester crown court on 10th February 2004.
Andrew Malkinson’s trial solicitor Shah Ali had himself served a prison sentence for fraud and had been struck off the solicitors roll by the solicitors regulations authority (SRA).
A 2004 Bolton news article reported the following in relation to Andrew Malkinson’s trial;
The judge described 38-year-old Malkinson as a “sexual predator” and a danger to women when he was sentenced at Manchester Crown Court on Tuesday.
He was found guilty of attempting to choke, asphyxiate or stangle with intent to rape the 33-year-old woman as she walked home alone through Little Hulton following a row with her boyfriend.
She was dragged down a motorway embankment in Cleggs Lane and attacked in the early hours of July 19 last year.
Sentencing, Judge Michael Henshell, said:
“This is amongst the most serious cases of this type and these circumstances make you out as a sexual predator, and a man who is prepared to use extreme violence against a defenceless victim.
“I have no doubt that you pose a high risk to women that at present cannot be accurately assessed.
“The effect of this attack on your victim will live with her for the rest if her life.”
He recommended that Malkinson would be eligible for parole after 14 years and would serve a minimum of seven years, including the nine months he has been in custody already.
During February’s seven-day trial at Manchester Crown Court the victim — who cannot be named for legal reasons — told the jury how she thought she was going to die at the hands of her attacker.
On the 24th January 2023 the criminal cases review commission (CCRC) made a statement here.
Excerpts from the CCRC’s statement read:
CCRC Chairman Helen Pitcher OBE said:
“This referral highlights the importance of the CCRC to our criminal justice system. New evidence can come to light years after a conviction, and in this case years after our first review of Mr Malkinson’s application.
“Following Mr Malkinson’s application, we used our special powers and expertise to re-examine this case, instructing experts to undertake state of the art DNA testing.
The new DNA evidence found by the CCRC does not prove that the man on the DNA database committed these or any offences.
The CCRC has, however, passed the new DNA evidence to Greater Manchester Police for them to consider further.
Excerpts from the CCRC’s 24th January 2023 statement including comments made by Helen Pitcher – chair of the CCRC
Wasn’t it premature of the CCRC to pass their alleged “new DNA evidence” to Greater Manchester police when convicted rapist Andrew Malkinson’s conviction(s) have yet to been deemed ‘unsafe’ by the court of appeal?
And wasn’t it equally premature for Greater Manchester police to make an arrest whilst Andrew Malkinson remains convicted for his crimes?
According to a 3rd May 2023 BBC article a man was ‘arrested and released under investigation’;
Greater Manchester Police confirmed in January a man had been arrested and released under investigation in light of the new information, but no decision has yet been made on whether he will be charged.
A further excerpt from the BBC article, referring to the undated circumstantial DNA found on Andrew Malkinson’s victims clothing, read;
…in October, the sample was found to be a partial match for another man, who the court ordered can only be identified as “Mr B”, and forensic investigations were ongoing, with a final report due later this month.
A May 2023 Manchester evening news article by Neal Keeling stated;
Mr Henry said Greater Manchester Police were on notice about this matter from 2009 as to other DNA.
A forensic review done for the CPS in December that year had identified saliva on the bra.
It revealed a mixed DNA profile – the majority that of the victim – but it showed the prescence of at least two persons.
He said Mr B was consequently identified as someone who could have been identified by that DNA.
Excerpts by Neal Keeling for Manchester evening news article dated 3rd May 2023
As in the case of Scottish killer Luke Mitchell, the alleged saliva could have already been present at the scene of crime before Andrew Malkinson attacked his victim.
Or like in the case of killer Kevin Nunn, where background circumstantial DNA of another man featured in the case.
DNA evidence is circumstantial evidence and cannot be dated.
Convicted rapist Andrew Malkinson fled the area following his attack on his victim, who incidentally identified him during a police photographic identification parade.
The victim had said to rapist Andrew Malkinson before he rendered her unconscious she would “never forget his face”
Two other people also identified him following his victim just prior to his attack and rapes.
The CCRC made no reference in their January 2023 statement to all the circumstantial evidence which convicted violent rapist Andrew Malkinson in 2004.
Have the CCRC managed to magic away this evidence, like they did in the case of self-confessed killer Simon Hall in 2009, when they referred his murder conviction to the court of appeal.
Tap on the button below to read more on The Fraud of the Criminal cases review commission;
Surprised somewhat at the question as most comes from the book, from Sandra Lean over time where the logs etc are concerned.
As stated repeatedly around the search trio – It has always been that they arrived at that the V, not a foot past it.
And not from the first account onwards has it been different.
It was only ever Luke Mitchell who stated they did.
And I have discussed this directly with Sandra Lean, and her proof as always is around the dog.
Of Stephen Kelly and the “dogs head being level with the V” –
That is not proof of Luke Mitchells account or actions, not even close to it. And it is an accumulation of events not just a dog at the V.
And my repetition of being easily led and blind faith stands –
You, nor anyone else have ever been shown any proof of those changes, that come close to agreeing with Luke Mitchell and changing their minds.
The evidence led, the reason for that wall and the jury being taken to Roan’s Dyke path, was to show them one thing clearly.
That Luke Mitchel and his dog did not go past the V.
That he turned immediately to his left when he went over.
That he had barely had time to walk ten steps when he shouted out. That he did not, when Steven Kelly or Alice Walker go over, even walk around 10 steps to show them. That he did describe what was impossible to do.
Steven Kelly had to walk around 20 feet to see.
And it has always been the case, that these areas of statements, in sequence could always have been shown, to back up these nonsense claims of agreeing with Luke Mitchell.
They have not been and will not be shown, for they do not.
The only thing Donald Findlay could do at trial, was attempt the same where the dog was concerned.
What he did not do and could not do, was take anyone of that search party, passed the V.
He was furious at the evidence of the map Luke Mitchell drew to the FLO (family liaison officer).
So it was never about the dog, or Steven Kelly forgetting (claimed) that it was standing at the V.
It was always about Luke Mitchells claims of going past that V with his dog, THEN the dog reacting.
It did not happen.
There was nothing other than special knowledge for his actions. Every one of them.
And that time line can not be changed – that clear sequence of phone logs which back up the statements.
And Luke Mitchel in less than 10mins was ready and on that path in comparison to the search trio. 35mins it took to get ready and be on that path. And they did arrive at the junctions until around 11.20pm and they did see Luke Mitchel and they walked to meet with him, in the top half of that path.
And the time was approx 11.23 when they set off down together.
I will work backwards here for you:
11.34pm call to 999, and Alice Walker and Janine Jones can be heard screaming in that call.
It was made whilst Alice Walker was with her granddaughter.
Work those 40ft or so back to the V, to being helped over.
To Steven Kelly and his 20ft and back and it brings you to Luke Mitchell and just after 11.30 when he went over and walked his ten ft or so inline with Janine Jones and Steven Kelly.
And we work back our 6-7 mins from here to that meet and start of the walk down at around 11.23pm.
And back from this to the search trio leaving Alice Walker’s after that call at 11.03pm. To John Ferris saying it was “around 11pm” he saw them leaving.
Yvonne Walker stayed in a top flat overlooking, down the St to her Grandmothers house.
The pages of waffle set to confuse are for just that reason – to deflect away from Luke Mitchell.
The total time for walking the full length of Roan’s Dyke path was timed at just over 11mins.
He was on that path twice that time, by is own claims.
And he was prepped and ready for the off.
Ms Lean claims he “grabbed the torch and dog and left” –
Not what Luke Mitchell said though, is it? And not what Sandra Lean has shown before on forums.
That he went upstairs and asked his brother for the torch, that Shane Mitchell came down and located said torch, the debate with his mother, then left.
So the waffle – not one bit of it makes any difference to Luke Mitchells actions and to what took place from 10.38pm.
And there is not one single piece of evidence other that waffle to put that search trio, anywhere other than Alice Walker’s at 11.03pm.
There is no multiple IF’s around if they had arrived this time or that time – they arrived at that path when they did.
It is Luke Mitchell that does not fit into any rational.
Plain and simple, attempting to tie him in with the search trio, does not work.
You can not change the evidence.
So I studied the book, the forums – was part and still part of a group, two of whom attended the trial.
The one area I studied was reason as to why suspicion fell upon Luke Mitchell. – there was no tunnel vision.