Heather Brunt and her continuous abuse, harassment and perverted nonsense is encouraged by innocence fraud scammer Sandra Lean.
Some of malicious troll Heather Brunt’s continuous abuse, harassment, defamation and perverted nonsense has been referred to by What They Found in their recent video on the murderer and his enablers innocence fraud.
The latest video by What They Found can be listened to below;
Read more by tapping on the buttons below;
In 2007 scammer Sandra Lean made comparisons to guilty killers John Taft and Simon Hall’s cases to that of guilty killer Luke Mitchell.
Sandra Lean stated;
Like Simon Hall and John Taft, a central aspect to the case involves a piece of clothing claimed to have belonged to the defendant, but that claim is never, at any point, backed up by proof.
Also, as with Simon Hall, the lack of a definitive time of death allows a presumption to be presented almost as fact – neither Luke nor Simon had a cast iron alibi at a specific time, therefore the prosecution presumes that to be the time of death.
Failure of forensic experts to attend the scene in a timely manner allowed evidence to be lost in both of these cases.
Finally, as with Derek Christian and Simon Hall, we are asked to believe that Luke Mitchell suddenly and inexplicably “flipped,” behaving in a manner which is completely uncharacteristic, then almost instantly returns to normal.
Excerpts from Sandra Lean’s 1st discredited book No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice (first published in May 2007)
Tap on the button below to read a copy of scammer Sandra Lean’s chapter on guilty killer Luke Mitchell;
Common sense would surely suggest that people would question Sandra Lean’s credibility and that if she got so much so wrong in cases like guilty killers John Taft and Simon Hall’s cases, how much has she got wrong in killer Luke Mitchell’s case.
Heather Brunt, Roddy McKendry and Suzy Hall do not appear concerned by Sandra Lean’s misleading and false innocence fraud narratives.
Abusive troll Heather Brunt recently published a copy of a photograph of her latest target – an innocent man called James Falconer.
Roddy McKendry and Suzy Hall chose to comment underneath with their own deluded nonsense.
As much as these people say the worst thing ever is “accusing an innocent person”, they choose to do it anyway – as is evidenced below;
A February 2008 media article here stated that a “used condom was found 50 metres from the spot where Jodi was killed”.
Another article here stated;
As for Falconer, the defence say a recently used condom was found 50 metres from the murder scene.
DNA swabs matched a sample taken from Falconer two months ago.
The defence papers declare:
“His explanation given to police for semen in a condom lacked credibility and aspects of his statement have proven to be false.
Common sense would again surely suggest that innocent James Falconer may have met up with someone back in June 2003 and had “safe sex” by choosing to use a condom.
It is not known if James Falconer wrote his own witness statement or if a police officer wrote it for him.
However what is known is that James Falconer was ruled out of the investigation and his name was dropped from the 2008 appeal.
Innocent James Falconer had nothing whatsoever to do with killer Luke Mitchell’s murderous crimes.
Scammer Scott Forbes did not “come forward” until “some 18 months” after sadistic killer Luke Mitchell had been found guilty for his murder on 21st January 2005.
Scott Forbes did not make a statement until January 2008.
Excerpts from a February 2008 Herald article headed Man named in appeal tried to sell story to newspapers stated;
A man who claimed to have vital evidence which could clear Luke Mitchell of the horrific murder of his girlfriend, Jodi Jones, hoped to get a massive pay-off from selling his story, appeal judges heard yesterday.
Mitchell’s defence team wants the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh to hear more about claims that a cannabis smoker with unusual tastes in rock music and internet violence might be a possible “suspect”.
He was supposed to have been near the woods where Jodi, 14, was murdered in June, 2003, to have been acting strangely in the days following and to have sustained unexplained injuries to his face.
Donald Findlay, QC, said that the drug addict, named only as Mark Kane, “ticked all the same boxes” as Mitchell.
The lawyer told appeal judges that Mitchell’s defence team had been made aware of the addict by another man, Scott Forbes, who had first come forward some 18 months after Mitchell had been convicted of Jodi’s murder and given a life sentence.
Mr Findlay said that Mr Forbes had sworn out a statement last month and his claims were being investigated.
But John Beckett, QC, for the Crown, revealed that police investigations cast doubt on what Mr Forbes had told solicitors – and a BBC Frontline Scotland programme in May last year.
Excerpts from a Herald article headed Man named in appeal tried to sell story to newspapers dated 14th February 2008
Innocent Mark Kane was traced and eliminated during the police investigation via CCTV.
In Part 253 of this ongoing blog series, Scott Forbes is evidenced confirming killer Luke Mitchell had not stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house in Livingstone “for weeks” before he committed his murder.
Tap on the button below to read Part 253;
Fraudster Scott Forbes told numerous lies in his self published defamatory book.
The following is an excerpt from the defamatory book where Scott Forbes lies about killer Luke Mitchell hidden trousers with Jodi Jones🌻 DNA found on them;
Jodi Jones’ DNA was found on a pair of trousers belonging to Luke Mitchell. The trousers were in a holdall at his father’s house in Livingston, a home he hadn’t been to for at least a fortnight prior to the murder of Jodi. The evidence was, therefore, deemed irrelevant and agreed to be dismissed.
False statements by Scott Forbes taken from page 24 of his self published defamatory book
Abuser Heather Brunt, who is referred to in Part 252 of this blog series, re-produced Scott Forbes bare faced lie about killer Luke Mitchell’s hidden trousers on the 12th July 2023 via her Twitter social media account, as can be seen in the screenshot below;
Killer Luke Mitchell’s trousers, which had Jodi Jones🌻 DNA on them, were hidden in a holdall in his home at Newbattle Abbey Crescent NOT his father Philip Mitchell’s house in Livingstone.
Corinne Mitchell also highlighted this fact well over a decade ago, when she posted on un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton’s WAP website forum.
Below is a reproduction of one of Corinne Mitchell’s posts, taken from the now defunct WAP forum;
The above was copied from the UK Justice forum here
Again, killer Luke Mitchell’s hold-all was seized from his mother Corinne Mitchell’s house.
The excuse was that the hold-all was used by the killer when he stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house in Livingstone, not that it was seized from Philip Mitchell’s house!
Tap on the button below to read about reporting Scott Forbes’ self published defamatory book;
Much of the content of Scott Forbes self published book available on Amazon.co.uk is defamatory.
We have used one defamatory paragraph from his book in the below Notice to Amazon of Defamatory Content on Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.co.uk requests that you “set out” your full name, postal address, telephone number, email address and occupation.
Amazon.co.uk also state the following;
Please note that if you do not give consent to the disclosure of your name and email address, Amazon may be required to disclose your full contact details in response to a Court Order requested by the relevant author / publisher / manufacturer.
However at this stage of the Notice to Amazon of Defamatory Content on Amazon.co.uk, we suggest you omit most of your personal details for data privacy.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
Notice to Amazon of Defamatory Content on Amazon.co.uk
In the matter of http://www.amazon.co.uk
S T A T E M E N T
I, your name of your e-mail address, say as follows:
1. I refer to the website http://www.amazon.co.uk (“the website”). I make this statement in support of me giving Amazon.co.uk notice that, via the website, it is causing or contributing to the publication of a defamatory statement.
2. The defamatory words appears in a book being sold on the website entitled A Long Walk to Justice with ISBN number 1999617118. The defamatory content appears on page 56 of the book, on Amazon kindle.
3. The content that I consider to be defamatory is;
“As a teenager Joseph Jones found his father in the garden, who had committed suicide by hanging himself. It was reported that Joseph was never the same again, and that he partly blamed his sister for his fathers suicide. The night before Mr Jones hung himself, a nine year old Jodi walked into an “adult party” in the living room of her house. She ran out of the room grabbing a large bottle of vodka in protest. The following morning Joseph found his father in the garden.”
The defamatory content is unlawful because it is false and it is likely to cause ‘serious harm’ to the reputation of the people named.
Jodi Jones at the age of 9 years went on holiday with her gran Alice Walker, her aunt, uncle and cousins to Bulgaria. On her return Jodi Jones found out the devastating news her father was dead. He had taken his life whilst Jodi Jones was away from home. Jodi Jones mother made that horrific discovery in the garden the following morning.
7. I confirm that I do not have sufficient information about the person originally responsible for the content I am complaining about to enable me to bring proceedings against that person.
8. My complaint relates to defamatory content appearing in a book being sold on the website. I do not agree to my name and email address being provided by Amazon to the person originally responsible for the content I am complaining about.
9. I understand that this statement may be used in any court proceedings that may arise out of or relating to the defamatory content which I have complained about.
Statement of Truth
I declare the facts stated above to be true.
…………………………………………………………………………………………
UK Defamation Notice”& Send To defamation-notice@amazon.co.uk
Tap on the button below to read more on liars and abusers convicted killer Luke Mitchell, Scott Forbes and Sandra Lean;
Fake lawyer, scammer and abuser Scott Forbes has made numerous defamatory accusations over the years, beginning towards his alleged “friend” Mark Kane.
Scott Forbes’s defamation and smear campaigns appear to have escalated since he appeared in a channel 5 TV show in February 2021 called Murder in a small town.
The TV show promoted the propaganda and innocence fraud of sadistic killer Luke Mitchell and his toxic enabler Sandra Lean.
Scott Forbes has used numerous “alternative accounts” on various social media platforms over the years, one of which was referred to in Part 125 of this blog series, which can be read by tapping on the button below;
Fraudster Scott Forbes often forgets to log out of his “alternate” social media accounts and has been caught out numerous times, including when he responded to Gerry Kelly using his GovanG51 account, as can be seen in the screenshot below;
Statements made by abuser and fraudster Scott Forbes, using one of his “alternative accounts” GovanG51, have been copied from the comments section of scammer Sandra Lean’s latest YouTube innocence fraud nonsense – where she spoke with registered sex offender and convicted rapist Sean Parker.
Sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell was, and is, the only person responsible for his murder and whilst someone may have gone on to make a statement claiming they saw Joseph Jones following his sister Jodi Jones🌻on the 30th June 2003.
There is no evidence anywhere to back up this fantasists allegations!
NOTE: Innocence Fraud Watch do not support or endorse any of the abusive, defamatory statements and bare faced lies made by Scott Forbes Aka GovanG5191 and are reproducing them below for evidential purposes only;
Tap on the button below to read how sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell’s violent nature was recognised by 7 years of age and how his violence escalated into murder one month shy of his 15th Birthday;
During an April 2021 interview with Granada’s ITV news here, violent rapist Andrew Malkinson’s solicitor Emily Bolton made the following absurd statements;
So the new D, DNA testing that’s been done
Eh proves that another person
An unknown male
Eh is the, the source of the DNA that was found
Eh on evidence gathered from the victim in the case
And that means that not only is Andy innocent
It means that someone else out there who is guilty of this crime
Eh that, that should be a very very troubling thought for Greater Manchester police
Who did the original investigation
Eh and who are also now looking
You know, looking at
Looking at their position
They’ve gotta decide what to do next
And what we’re asking Greater Manchester police to do
Is join us
In, our application to the criminal case review commission
Eh which is the route to the court of appeal for Andy
The route to getting the conviction quashed
Emily Bolton – 29th April 2021 here
Why was a man arrested in December 2022 for a solved crime, which violent rapist and fraudster Andrew Malkinson is already convicted of?
Circumstantial DNA cannot be dated.
And it does not erase the fact Andrew Malkinson was identified by his victim, who said to him just before he strangled her to unconsciousness she would “never forget” his face.
It also does not negate the fact he did a runner from the area, when he learned his victim was helping police compile an E-Fit of him, which was to be published.
Nor does it explain the fact that Andrew Malkinson wore the same clothes for his job as a security guard, which the victim described her attacker as wearing.
Tap on the button below to read more on violent rapist Andrew Malkinson;
During the trial the judge made clear to the jury both John and Deborah Hardman had previous criminal convictions
Statement by Emily Dugan made on 1st October 2021 via a podcast called Seventeen years
Violent rapist and parasitic predator Andrew Malkinson claimed on 1st October 2021 that Deborah and Jonathan Hardman, who were prosecution witnesses during his trial, were “being arsehole’s” and “bugging” him at work and allegedly “making threats of physical violence” towards him.
Andrew Malkinson had apparently told the Hardman’s in June 2003 he would pay them back the £75 flight money they paid for him to fly to the UK from Gran Canaria.
It appears the Hardman family were targeted by Andrew Malkinson after he phoned them to tell them in the UK to tell them he had allegedly been “mugged” and had no money.
He also went on to tell them he would repay them for the sofa he soiled, after urinating on it one night whilst drunk.
On the 24th July 2003, five days after Andrew Malkinson’s vicious attack and rape, Bolton News reported under the header Police hope for e-fit of rapist some of the following;
Detectives were today interviewing a woman recovering from a brutal rape in a bid to draw up an e-fit image of her attacker.
The 33-year-old mother-of-two, from Kearsley, was grabbed from behind as she walked home from a night out with friends along the M61 motorway bridge in Cleggs Lane, Little Hulton in the early hours of Saturday.
She was strangled until she became unconscious and then raped.
She has received counselling from trained officers and was today hoping to describe her attacker to detectives for them to compile an artist’s impression
Excerpt from an article by Bolton news headed Police hope for e-fit of rapist dated 24th July 2003
Once the E-Fit was completed it was circulated to local police officers.
On the same day Andrew Malkinson’s victim was helping police compile an E-fit of him, Andrew Malkinson “had had a photograph taken at work for a security pass on 24 July”.
It was reported that police constables (Pc) Gary Waite and Christopher Baybutt had realised the E-Fit looked remarkably similar to a man they had stopped riding pillion on an off road motorbike the month before.
The person driving the off road motorbike was the son of Deborah and Jonathan Hardman and the pillion passenger was Andrew Malkinson.
Excerpts from an August 2004 Manchester evening news article read;
By chance, four weeks before Malkinson committed the vicious rape, he was riding pillion on an off-road motorbike which was stopped by Little Hulton community beat officers, Pc Gary Waite and Pc Christopher Baybutt.
They warned the rider not to use the machine on the road and took his details and Malkinson’s.At the time Malkinson was working as a security guard at the Ellesmere Shopping Centre, in Walkden.
Excerpts from a Manchester evening news article headed Strange drifter who covered his tracks dated 13th August 2004
Pc’s Gary Waite and Christopher Baybutt were reported to have “alerted senior officers” and the hunt for Andrew Malkinson began.
When police arrived at fellow security guard Simon Oakes flat in Aspinall court, Atherton, where Andrew Malkinson had been sofa surfing after the Hardman’s had kicked him out, he was already on the run.
Andrew Malkinson told Emily Dugan in 2021 via a podcast called Seventeen years that on the 25th of July 2003 he “quit his job” as a security guard at Ellesmere shopping centre in Walkden and also apparently “called the police to complain” about Jonathan and Deborah Hardman.
Andrew Malkinson then had Simon Oakes drop him off at Manchester airport, telling Simon he planned to fly to Holland.
Instead of catching a flight however, Andrew Malkinson slept rough at the airport and eventually caught a train to Grimsby where Emily Dugan said he spent “a couple of nights” at a Salvation Army hostel.
The Manchester evening news reported on the 13th August 2004 under the header Strange drifter who covered his tracks that Andrew Malkinson had initially told the police he had changed his mind as “no standby flights were available” but by 2021 this narrative had also changed.
Below is a transcribe taken from Part 2 of the 2021 podcast where reporters Emily Dugan and Neal Keeling, along with rapist and fraudster Andrew Malkinson refer to the day of 25th July 2003, which was the day after it was announced his victim was helping police compile an E-Fit.
Emily Dugan stated:
On the 25th of July he decided to leave the area
This was 6 days after the rape took place
He was driven to Manchester airport by his flat mate
But upon arrival he says there was no direct flights to Amsterdam
Statements by Emily Dugan – 1st October 2021
Again Andrew Malkinson had initially told police that “no standby flights were available”, 18 years later he is now claiming “there was no direct flights to Amsterdam ”.
However Neal Keeling stated;
Malkinson’s explanation was that he’d just changed his mind
Instead of going back to Holland he went to Grimsby, his home town
Statements by Neal Keeling – 1st October 2021
Again, Andrew Malkinson had initially told police “no standby flights were available”.
But by the time he spoke to Emily Dugan in 2021 Andrew Malkinson now stated;
I thought it was an international airport
I thought it was open 24/7
And I got there, I.. I think it was after 8
Everything was shut, shut it down..
Statements by Andrew Malkinson – 1st October 2021
Manchester airport was NOT shut on the 25th of July 2003 and Andrew Malkinson had initially told police “no standby flights were available”.
Emily Dugan then stated;
I presume you didn’t have a smartphone in terms of trying to book a flight or knowing the airport was open
You know what access did you have for that information
Statements by Emily Dugan – 1st October 2021
Again Manchester airport WAS open on the 25th July 2003 and Andrew Malkinson had initially told police “no standby flights were available”.
Andrew Malkinson’s reply to Emily Dugan was;
No no
I.. I didn’t have any access at all
I was pondering what to do I thought I.. I.. can get a flight anytime I’ll go and see my mum
So I went to Grimsby to see my mum ‘cos I hadn’t seen her for a long time
I changed my plans you know
Like I always do
I’m a traveller
Statements by Andrew Malkinson – 1st October 2021
It is not known if Andrew Malkinson ever visited his mother Trisha/Trish.
Nor is it known if Andrew Malkinson’s mother gave evidence during his trial to support her sons claim that he had gone to visit her.
However the earliest he could have arrived in Grimsby would have been Saturday the 26th of July, that’s if he only slept rough the one night in Manchester airport.
Emily Dugan then stated;
After sleeping at the airport, Andy got the train to Grimsby and stayed at the Salvation Army for a couple of nights
He’d quit his job as a security guard in Manchester and soon began collecting unemployment benefits
Statements by Emily Dugan – 1st October 2021
If he only stayed at the Salvation Army hostel a “couple of nights” as Emily Dugan claimed, then this could suggest Andrew Malkinson slept there on Thursday the 31st July and Friday the 1st August, because Andrew Malkinson was arrested on the morning of Saturday the 2nd August 2003.
The earliest he could have gone to the job centre was Monday the 28th of July as they were only open Monday-Friday and it is unlikely Andrew Malkinson would have “began collecting employment benefits” in just five days.
Andrew Malkinson stated;
I signed on and told them my name and where I’m staying
If you’re someone running away you don’t disclose where you are do you
Statements by Andrew Malkinson – 1st October 2021
Neither Emily Dugan or Neal Keeling mention the fact that the day before Andrew Malkinson went on the run, it had been reported that his victim was helping the police compile an E-Fit sketch of her attacker.
Aftet Andrew Malkinson had “signed on” at Grimsby job centre, the job centre made a check with Ellesmere shopping centre in Walkden “whose managers tipped off police that Malkinson was in Grimsby”.
Scott Forbes “LIARS” are the easiest to expose, and in your case transparent.
Having highlighted several directly around yourself, then placing that same question repeatedly, how do people accept anything you say, how can they even begin to determine what is true or not?
The utter BS of having defence papers in 2006 (Tap on the above button to read more), of being a lawyer for six (for Luke Mitchell) then 12 (for Luke Mitchell) to being an ex solicitor to not being near the case papers for years, constantly tripping over your lies, and that is only around you here.
I’m going to put one paragraph from your book up, we then take that paragraph, and we apply it across everything that comes out of your mouth –
Exposed Scott Forbes and apply under your chapter titled “LIARS”
But firstly Luke Mitchell and some further information.
Whilst a prisoner no longer needs to admit guilt for rehabilitation, they certainly need to carry out empathy courses, for the victim and their families
Innocent Scott Forbes is NOT someone constantly wanting to cause harm to multiple others, Innocence Scott Forbes is empathy, protection of the victim especially when that victim is their girlfriend.
Having enablers carry out a smear campaign of their victim Scott Forbes, lying about their victim, their family, a wilful intent to cause harm to other human life Scott Forbes, is NOT the actions of innocence.
Innocence is truth Scott Forbes
Neither Luke Mitchell, nor those enabling him are in anyway truthful Scott Forbes
Behave.
First the truth Scott Forbes, known by Luke Mitchell, by Sandra Lean and of course yourself.
One-chapter Scott Forbes to show without any semblance of doubt, just how easily you all lie, how easily you aim to cause harm to other human life, how easily you abuse the victim in this case, how easily you lie about her, how easily you abuse her and use her as a stick to beat others with.
How easily you do this for Luke Mitchell, on behalf of him, by being his vessel, his voice, after stating of that full control last year he would have.
Sandra Lean who states, “I do not work with liars”
Yes she does, she fully backs and aided you in that book, you tell us that, she tells us this when stating Luke Mitchell requested that she help you Scott Forbes.
So, the truth, and how there is absolutely no doubt that you all know the truth, backed to the hilt in statements, evidence heard in court and an essay from Jodi Jones herself.
Jodi at the age of 9 years went on holiday with her gran Alice Walker, her aunt, uncles and cousins to Bulgaria.
On her return she found out the devastating news her father was dead. He had taken his life whilst Jodi was away from home.
The family for several years had been staying with Alice Walker at her house. Whilst three members of the family slept Judith Jones, Joseph Jones (14) and Janine Jones (13).
Jodi’s mother made that horrific discovery the following morning.
The evidence in court, of who was present, of Jodi’s return home, the difficult times ahead in their grief.
Here Scott Forbes is you, Sandra Lean on behalf of Luke Mitchell;
As a teenager Joseph Jones found his father in the garden, who had committed suicide by hanging himself. It was reported that Joseph was never the same again, and that he partly blamed his sister for his fathers suicide. The night before Mr Jones hung himself, a nine year old Jodi walked into an “adult party” in the living room of her house. She ran out of the room grabbing a large bottle of vodka in protest. The following morning Joseph found his father in the garden…
Liar Scott Charles Forbes – October 2022
From your book Scott Forbes?
This is how Luke Mitchell, how you, how Sandra Lean abuse the victim Scott Forbes by blatantly lying, applying fantasy as a rod to fit Joseph Jones into some crazed up theories.
A 9 year old with vodka and all else who was 1000’s of miles away from home.
I am only highlighting this, to show and expose lies that cannot be denied.
There is of course so much more.
The further and constant abuse of turning her death into something it was not.
The manipulation around the forensics, the blanking of an agreement, to produce and incite people into believing that poor girl, who had suffered enough in the way she died, had been gang raped and all else..
This is how Luke Mitchell treats his girlfriend, that is how he continuously abuses her young precious life.
That is how his enablers carry out his work for him Scott Forbes.
By manipulating and bending the actual truth so far out of shape it becomes almost intangible.
Further information gleaned Scott Forbes, and as highlighted above, exposed fully for promoting blatant lies around the victim Scott Forbes and her family.
Joseph Jones has never worked at the place you call “Home Farm”.
He had for a while worked with his uncle at a place called Dalkeith Demolition, something else you are fully aware of, but as with the above, you simply bend and shape anything to fit into anything, to abuse people on behalf of Luke Mitchell.
It does not matter how many times you apply the word “reported” whether from people lying, to you manipulating those lies, that you know are lies –
It is how as you rightly state Scott Forbes “Rotten to the core…” what was it you were saying about “gossip”
(Guest blog: Courtesy of Parky41)
Again, the above statement “No one trashes your name, more than someone who is afraid you will tell the truth” was made by fake lawyer Scott C Forbes, seemingly with the approval of Sandra Lean, and Kathryn Londry an executive director of the Elizabeth Fry society of Kingston, who Scott C Forbes stated had done “months of work, proof reading and restructuring..”.
Sandra Lean also appears to be afraid of the “truth”, as referred to by Scott Forbes above.
Stephanie (Hall) who was groomed, conned and exploited by Joan Albert’s killer (And others including Sandra Lean) after meeting him over twenty years ago, has had no direct contact with Sandra Lean since a few months after Joan Albert’s killers inquest.
The last time any direct contact was had by Stephanie (Hall) with Sandra Lean was here in 2017.
On the 9th of February 2021 (which was around two weeks before Sandra Lean appeared in a channel 5 TV show) Sandra Lean stated of Stephanie (Hall) “I wrote her a little poem”.
The TV show promoted the innocence fraud spin of Jodi Jones🌻 killer, and no doubt re-traumatised Jodi Jones🌻 loved ones, and others, in the process.
Sandra Lean chose to publish the following to one of her Facebook social media accounts;
There were 10 comments made under the post, nearly half of which were by Sandra Lean stating;
Sandra Lean’s “poem” was liked 26 times and one of the people who chose to like and comment on Sandra’s post was the mother of the killer of Paul Gerard “PG” McGilvray – Carol Toal who stated;
Joan Albert’s killers actual, factual guilt was exposed and established in 2012/13 respectively (Read here to learn more), and following his suicide his older brother here set up a ‘memorial’ website.
A screenshot of part of the site can be seen in Part 11a of the ongoing Quite A Hall Tale blog series here.
The mother of the killer of Paul Gerard “PG” McGilvray also chose to make a public comment on this ‘memorial’ site back in 2014.
Just over three months after Sandra Lean published her “poem”, she made the following statements in the comment section of one of her videos;
The first book was withdrawn to correct one typo where the wrong name was printed in error and to be updated because some of the people whose cases were featured have since died. But for some people, what they don’t know, they’ll just make up.
The first book was not withdrawn because it was full of lies and mistakes – I already explained that, but I guess you’ll just carry on believing what you want to believe anyway.
If you watched this update, you’ll have heard what I said about confident ignorance – thanks for demonstrating it for people.
I still talk about Susan May, Gordon Park and Simon Hall as well. I didn’t say I stopped talking about them – I said that No Smoke was withdrawn to be UPDATED about their deaths. It really does help if you read my replies properly, otherwise you’re just wasting everyone’s time – including your own.
Sandra Lean via the comments section of her 23rd of May 2021 YouTube video here
The ‘one typo’ Sandra Lean refers to is yet another of Sandra’s bare faced lies!
Sandra Lean’s “one typo” lie will be partly addressed in Part 7 of this blog series, and her first innocence fraud book “No Smoke” will also be addressed in more detail in future parts of The Truth Behind Actual, Factual, Guilty Killer Simon Hall & His & His Deceitful Enablers Innocence Fraud Phenomenon Scam blog series – who Sandra Lean claimed to “still talk about”.
Over several days in June 2021 Scott C Forbes made numerous statements via Twitter, below are a few screenshots of his tweets;
Jodi Jones🌻 killer is locked away in a prison, and Sandra Lean and Scott Forbes cannot debunk Stephanie (Hall’s) arguments, only her character?
“No one trashes your name, more than someone who is afraid you will tell the truth”
INNOCENCE FRAUD WATCH 