Innocence Fraud Watch Contact Court Of Appeal For Clarity Re: The 26th July 2023 Appeal Hearing Of Violent Rapist & Convicted Fraudster Andrew Malkinson (Part 28)

Violent rapist Andrew Malkinson in 2023

Innocence Fraud Watch Emailed Court Of Appeal

On the 2nd August 2023 Innocence Fraud Watch emailed the court of appeal after watching and listening to a recording of the appeal hearing online.

Below is a reproduced copy of most of the email sent to the court;

On the 26th July 2023 three judges heard the appeal of then convicted violent rapist and convicted fraudster (Thailand 2001) Andrew Malkinson.

Can the court of appeal judges please clarify on what date exactly police constables Gary Waite and Chris Baybutt visited Andrew Malkinson at work at Ellesmere shopping centre, Walkden following his violent attack and rapes on the 19th July 2003.

The real victim in this case was said to have made her witness statement on the 21st July 2003.

Andrew Malkinson said in 2016, via writer Bob Woffinden (in a book called the Nicholas cases) the date was Monday the 21st July 2003.

Edward Henry indicated during the 26th July 2023 appeal that the criminal cases review commission had mislead the appeal court when they had stated in their statement of reasons that this date was the 25th July 2003.

However Edward Henry stated during the 26th July appeal this date was “the day after” meaning the 20th July 2003.

Innocence Fraud Watch also included a link to Part 27 of this ongoing blog series, which can be read by tapping on the button below;

Media Spin

The mainstream media are spinning violent rapist, parasitic predator and convicted fraudster Andrew Malkinson’s position.

His violent convictions were found to be “unsafe” by the court of appeal (CoA) on the 26th July 2023.

The CoA did NOT find Andrew Malkinson “innocent” or “clear” him per se.

A minute trace of undated, circumstantial DNA found on a piece of clothing worn by Andrew Malkinson’s victim does not erase all the other evidence which points to Andrew Malkinson and only Andrew Malkinson.

Some of the evidence which led to Andrew Malkinson’s convictions has been explored in this blog series, the index for which can be found by tapping on the button below;

Link to Part 29 here

The Absurdity Of Emily Bolton On Violent Rapist, Fraudster & Parasitic Predator Andrew Malkinson & Asking Greater Manchester Police To Collude With An Already Convicted & Dangerous Sex Offender (Part 16)

Andrew Malkinson on holiday in Gran Canaria in May 2003
Andrew Malkinson in 2021
Emily Bolton 2021

During an April 2021 interview with Granada’s ITV news here, violent rapist Andrew Malkinson’s solicitor Emily Bolton made the following absurd statements;

So the new D, DNA testing that’s been done

Eh proves that another person

An unknown male

Eh is the, the source of the DNA that was found

Eh on evidence gathered from the victim in the case

And that means that not only is Andy innocent

It means that someone else out there who is guilty of this crime

Eh that, that should be a very very troubling thought for Greater Manchester police

Who did the original investigation

Eh and who are also now looking

You know, looking at

Looking at their position

They’ve gotta decide what to do next

And what we’re asking Greater Manchester police to do

Is join us

In, our application to the criminal case review commission

Eh which is the route to the court of appeal for Andy

The route to getting the conviction quashed

Emily Bolton – 29th April 2021 here

Arrest Over Solved Crime

Why was a man arrested in December 2022 for a solved crime, which violent rapist and fraudster Andrew Malkinson is already convicted of?

Circumstantial DNA cannot be dated.

And it does not erase the fact Andrew Malkinson was identified by his victim, who said to him just before he strangled her to unconsciousness she would “never forget” his face.

It also does not negate the fact he did a runner from the area, when he learned his victim was helping police compile an E-Fit of him, which was to be published.

Nor does it explain the fact that Andrew Malkinson wore the same clothes for his job as a security guard, which the victim described her attacker as wearing.

Tap on the button below to read more on violent rapist Andrew Malkinson;

Link to Part 17 here