Andrew Malkinson Innocent? Don’t Believe The Hype!

*LIVE* From New York City with Roberta Glass, from the True Crime Report, Who is ON the Record

Andrew Malkinson Innocent? Not So Fast…

*LIVE* From New York City with Roberta Glass from the True Crime Report

Innocence Fraud Watch Contact Court Of Appeal For Clarity Re: The 26th July 2023 Appeal Hearing Of Violent Rapist & Convicted Fraudster Andrew Malkinson (Part 28)

Violent rapist Andrew Malkinson in 2023

Innocence Fraud Watch Emailed Court Of Appeal

On the 2nd August 2023 Innocence Fraud Watch emailed the court of appeal after watching and listening to a recording of the appeal hearing online.

Below is a reproduced copy of most of the email sent to the court;

On the 26th July 2023 three judges heard the appeal of then convicted violent rapist and convicted fraudster (Thailand 2001) Andrew Malkinson.

Can the court of appeal judges please clarify on what date exactly police constables Gary Waite and Chris Baybutt visited Andrew Malkinson at work at Ellesmere shopping centre, Walkden following his violent attack and rapes on the 19th July 2003.

The real victim in this case was said to have made her witness statement on the 21st July 2003.

Andrew Malkinson said in 2016, via writer Bob Woffinden (in a book called the Nicholas cases) the date was Monday the 21st July 2003.

Edward Henry indicated during the 26th July 2023 appeal that the criminal cases review commission had mislead the appeal court when they had stated in their statement of reasons that this date was the 25th July 2003.

However Edward Henry stated during the 26th July appeal this date was “the day after” meaning the 20th July 2003.

Innocence Fraud Watch also included a link to Part 27 of this ongoing blog series, which can be read by tapping on the button below;

Media Spin

The mainstream media are spinning violent rapist, parasitic predator and convicted fraudster Andrew Malkinson’s position.

His violent convictions were found to be “unsafe” by the court of appeal (CoA) on the 26th July 2023.

The CoA did NOT find Andrew Malkinson “innocent” or “clear” him per se.

A minute trace of undated, circumstantial DNA found on a piece of clothing worn by Andrew Malkinson’s victim does not erase all the other evidence which points to Andrew Malkinson and only Andrew Malkinson.

Some of the evidence which led to Andrew Malkinson’s convictions has been explored in this blog series, the index for which can be found by tapping on the button below;

Link to Part 29 here