Violent rapist Andrew Malkinson in May 2023 on the left, and in May 2003 on the right
Clive Stafford-Smith (who’s wife Emily Bolton represents violent rapist Andrew Malkinson) said in a tweet that Emily Dugan “does an excellent job exploring more evidence of Andy Malkinson’s innocence”;
What Happened To His Security Guard Clothing & Footwear
To date Emily Dugan still hasn’t explained what happened to the clothing and footwear Andrew Malkinson wore as a security guard at the Ellesmere shopping centre.
Why Did He Do A Runner On The Day After He Learned His Victim Was Helping The Police Compile An E-Fit
Emily Dugan has also never explained why Andrew Malkinson did a runner on the day after he learned his victim was helping police compile an E-Fit of her attacker – his face she told him just before she lost consciousness she would “never forget”.
Omitted To Mention The Violent Rapist Was A Former Amateur Boxer Who Learned In His 20’s He Was Adopted
Emily Dugan made no mention in the 6 part podcast she wrote with Will Roe about the fact Andrew Malkinson was a former amateur boxer or that he learned in his early 20’s he had been adopted.
What Was He Doing In The Year & A Half He Was Meant To Have Been Deported From A Thai Prison
In 2001 Andrew Malkinson had travelled to Phuket, Thailand where he committed passport fraud, which saw him being sent to prison allegedly for 6 months.
How Did He Raise The Funds For Gran Canaria
Emily Dugan said in the podcast that Andrew Malkinson had stayed in a “hotel type complex” but according to Bob Woffinden in 2016, he had stayed in an “apartment”.
He also had a return ticket, which Emily makes no mention of. And because she doesn’t mention this, she doesn’t ask him why he didn’t travel back to Amsterdam using the return portion of said ticket.
Did He Travel Alone To Gran Canaria & Some Basics
Emily Dugan does not appear to have bothered to establish some basic facts. Like the the name of the apartment or hotel type complex Andrew Malkinson had booked into for a week “paid upfront” on the 16th May 2003.
Confusion Over The Actual Day Of His Attack & Rape
Emily Dugan appears to have confused herself in the podcast over the day and date Andrew Malkinson committed his attack and rape.
And because of this she failed to ask him what exactly he was doing on the 19th and 20th of July.
Alleged Stolen Credit Cards
Andrew Malkinson told Bob Woffinden he’s allegedly had his “credit cards” stolen when he was allegedly “mugged” in Gran Canaria on the 1st of June 2003.
What were the names of the alleged credit cards?
And did he cancel them and have replacement cards sent to him when he arrived in Manchester? Emily Dugan doesn’t get to the bottom of any of these points.
4th July 2004 ‘Moonlight Flit’
Emily Dugan doesn’t mention the fact Andrew Malkinson left the Hardman’s house without saying goodbye after he’d urinated on their sofa, soiling it in the process.
Confusing The Timing Of Andrew Malkinson’s ‘Moonlit Flit’
Emily also appears to confuse the dates and timings around the rapists ‘moonlight flit’ from the Hardman’s house, to the time he contacted the police – because the former amateur boxer was allegedly being “threatened” by Jonathan and Deborah Hardman.
£200 Compensation Quadruples To £800
Emily also doesn’t seem to recognise the fact Andrew Malkinson’s figure of compensation to Jonathan and Deborah Hardman had quadrupled in 5/6 years, since he first communicated with Bob Woffinden.
Why Did The Rapist Pretend In 2016 His Attack & Rape Were Made Up?
And shockingly but not surprisingly Emily Dugan made no reference to the fact violent rapist Andrew Malkinson was pretending back in 2016, via Bob Woffinden, that his victim had made everything up;
Apart from her own story, there is no evidence whatever of an attack.
There is no scientific evidence on her of an attacker, and nor is there evidence of any sexual assault upon her.
Violent rapist & fraudster Andrew Malkinson, via Bob Woffinden here dated 24th May 2016
Photo of violent rapist & parasitic predator Andrew Malkinson in Gran Canaria in May 2003
During the trial the judge made clear to the jury both John and Deborah Hardman had previous criminal convictions
Statement by Emily Dugan made on 1st October 2021 via a podcast called Seventeen years
Violent rapist and parasitic predator Andrew Malkinson claimed on 1st October 2021 that Deborah and Jonathan Hardman, who were prosecution witnesses during his trial, were “being arsehole’s” and “bugging” him at work and allegedly “making threats of physical violence” towards him.
Andrew Malkinson had apparently told the Hardman’s in June 2003 he would pay them back the £75 flight money they paid for him to fly to the UK from Gran Canaria.
It appears the Hardman family were targeted by Andrew Malkinson after he phoned them to tell them in the UK to tell them he had allegedly been “mugged” and had no money.
He also went on to tell them he would repay them for the sofa he soiled, after urinating on it one night whilst drunk.
24th July 2003: Police Hope For E-Fit Of Rapist
On the 24th July 2003, five days after Andrew Malkinson’s vicious attack and rape, Bolton News reported under the header Police hope for e-fit of rapist some of the following;
Detectives were today interviewing a woman recovering from a brutal rape in a bid to draw up an e-fit image of her attacker.
The 33-year-old mother-of-two, from Kearsley, was grabbed from behind as she walked home from a night out with friends along the M61 motorway bridge in Cleggs Lane, Little Hulton in the early hours of Saturday.
She was strangled until she became unconscious and then raped.
She has received counselling from trained officers and was today hoping to describe her attacker to detectives for them to compile an artist’s impression
Excerpt from an article by Bolton news headed Police hope for e-fit of rapist dated 24th July 2003
Once the E-Fit was completed it was circulated to local police officers.
On the same day Andrew Malkinson’s victim was helping police compile an E-fit of him, Andrew Malkinson “had had a photograph taken at work for a security pass on 24 July”.
It was reported that police constables (Pc) Gary Waite and Christopher Baybutt had realised the E-Fit looked remarkably similar to a man they had stopped riding pillion on an off road motorbike the month before.
The person driving the off road motorbike was the son of Deborah and Jonathan Hardman and the pillion passenger was Andrew Malkinson.
Excerpts from an August 2004 Manchester evening news article read;
By chance, four weeks before Malkinson committed the vicious rape, he was riding pillion on an off-road motorbike which was stopped by Little Hulton community beat officers, Pc Gary Waite and Pc Christopher Baybutt.
They warned the rider not to use the machine on the road and took his details and Malkinson’s.
At the time Malkinson was working as a security guard at the Ellesmere Shopping Centre, in Walkden.
Pc’s Gary Waite and Christopher Baybutt were reported to have “alerted senior officers” and the hunt for Andrew Malkinson began.
25th July ‘03: Andrew Malkinson Quits His Job & Flees Area Through Fear Of Being Recognised
When police arrived at fellow security guard Simon Oakes flat in Aspinall court, Atherton, where Andrew Malkinson had been sofa surfing after the Hardman’s had kicked him out, he was already on the run.
Andrew Malkinson told Emily Dugan in 2021 via a podcast called Seventeen years that on the 25th of July 2003 he “quit his job” as a security guard at Ellesmere shopping centre in Walkden and also apparently “called the police to complain” about Jonathan and Deborah Hardman.
Andrew Malkinson then had Simon Oakes drop him off at Manchester airport, telling Simon he planned to fly to Holland.
Instead of catching a flight however, Andrew Malkinson slept rough at the airport and eventually caught a train to Grimsby where Emily Dugan said he spent “a couple of nights” at a Salvation Army hostel.
The Manchester evening news reported on the 13th August 2004 under the header Strange drifter who covered his tracksthat Andrew Malkinson had initially told the police he had changed his mind as “no standby flights were available” but by 2021 this narrative had also changed.
Below is a transcribe taken from Part 2 of the 2021 podcast where reporters Emily Dugan and Neal Keeling, along with rapist and fraudster Andrew Malkinson refer to the day of 25th July 2003, which was the day after it was announced his victim was helping police compile an E-Fit.
EmilyDugan stated:
On the 25th of July he decided to leave the area
This was 6 days after the rape took place
He was driven to Manchester airport by his flat mate
But upon arrival he says there was no direct flights to Amsterdam
Statements by Emily Dugan – 1st October 2021
Again Andrew Malkinson had initially told police that “no standby flights were available”, 18 years later he is now claiming “there was no direct flights to Amsterdam ”.
However Neal Keeling stated;
Malkinson’s explanation was that he’d just changed his mind
Instead of going back to Holland he went to Grimsby, his home town
Statements by Neal Keeling – 1st October 2021
Again, Andrew Malkinson had initially told police “no standby flights were available”.
But by the time he spoke to Emily Dugan in 2021 Andrew Malkinson now stated;
I thought it was an international airport
I thought it was open 24/7
And I got there, I.. I think it was after 8
Everythingwasshut, shutitdown..
Statements by Andrew Malkinson – 1st October 2021
Manchester airport was NOT shut on the 25th of July 2003 and Andrew Malkinson had initially told police “no standby flights were available”.
Emily Dugan then stated;
Ipresume you didn’t have a smartphone in terms of trying to book a flight or knowing the airport was open
You know what access did you have for that information
Statements by Emily Dugan – 1st October 2021
Again Manchester airport WAS open on the 25th July 2003 and Andrew Malkinson had initially told police “no standby flights were available”.
Andrew Malkinson’s reply to Emily Dugan was;
No no
I.. I didn’t have any access at all
I was pondering what to do I thought I.. I.. can get a flight anytime I’ll go and seemymum
So I went to Grimsby to see my mum ‘cos I hadn’t seen her for a long time
Ichanged my plans you know
Like I always do
I’m a traveller
Statements by Andrew Malkinson – 1st October 2021
It is not known if Andrew Malkinson ever visited his mother Trisha/Trish.
Nor is it known if Andrew Malkinson’s mother gave evidence during his trial to support her sons claim that he had gone to visit her.
However the earliest he could have arrived in Grimsby would have been Saturday the 26th of July, that’s if he only slept rough the one night in Manchester airport.
Emily Dugan then stated;
After sleeping at the airport, Andy got the train to Grimsby and stayed at the Salvation Army for a couple of nights
He’d quit his job as a security guard in Manchester and soon began collecting unemployment benefits
Statements by Emily Dugan – 1st October 2021
If he only stayed at the Salvation Army hostel a “couple of nights” as Emily Dugan claimed, then this could suggest Andrew Malkinson slept there on Thursday the 31st July and Friday the 1st August, because Andrew Malkinson was arrested on the morning of Saturday the 2nd August 2003.
The earliest he could have gone to the job centre was Monday the 28th of July as they were only open Monday-Friday and it is unlikely Andrew Malkinson would have “began collecting employment benefits” in just five days.
Andrew Malkinson stated;
I signed on and told them my name and where I’m staying
If you’re someone running away you don’t disclose where you are do you
Statements by Andrew Malkinson – 1st October 2021
Neither Emily Dugan or Neal Keeling mention the fact that the day before Andrew Malkinson went on the run, it had been reported that his victim was helping the police compile an E-Fit sketch of her attacker.
Aftet Andrew Malkinson had “signed on” at Grimsby job centre, the job centre made a check with Ellesmere shopping centre in Walkden “whose managers tipped off police that Malkinson was in Grimsby”.
I think it’s clear that exonerations can be the result of fraud or misconduct on the part of post-conviction activists and litigators
John M Collins Jr
The majority of the people in the cult-like “wrongful conviction” movement will not acknowledge or address the innocence fraud phenomenon.
Not only do these people seem to not want to acknowledge and address this very real phenomenon, they do not to want to recognise and address their own failures and errors.
The majority of the people and organisations who were once associated with killer Simon Hall’s fraudulent public relations (PR) spin campaign and innocence fraud did not, and do not, appear to posses the humility to admit they were wrong or how, why and where exactly they went wrong.
On the 23rd of November 2006 Bristol university students had met with Keir Starmer at Doughty Street Chambers in London where “he raised an issue regarding the absence of statistical probabilities in the fibre evidence given by Judith Cunnison”.
Why didn’t Keir Starmer point out to the students that killer Simon Hall and the Hall family’s concoctions were a “crucial” part of the case against Simon Hall?
Campbell Malone
Campbell Malone
Campbell Malone, who was Simon Hall’s solicitor also appeared in the BBC Rough Justice TV show.
The following year Linda Tsang wrote a media article which was headed Lawyer of the week: Campbell Malone and asked Campbell Malone the following question;
What was your worst day as a lawyer?
Linda Tsang
Campbell Malone’s response was;
There have been a few.
It’s losing those cases you believe should not have been lost. The outstanding convictions of Susan May and Eddie Gilfoyle have to rank among the worst unresolved miscarriages of justice there have been.
And to lose those cases in the Court of Appeal, when there were compelling arguments as to why the convictions should have been quashed, still deeply troubles me.
But I know those cases will eventually come back before the Court of Appeal.
Hilda Marchbank (89) was murdered by her niece Susan May on the 11th of March 1992 and Paula Gilfoyle (32), who was 8 1/2 months pregnant at the time, was murdered on the 4th of June 1997 by her husband Eddie Gilfoyle.
The killers of Hilda Marchbank and Paula Gilfoyle have both been unsuccessful at the court of appeal and both killers fraudulent public relations campaigns and cases, bare all the hallmarks of the innocence fraud phenomenon.
Criminal Cases Review Commission
Three months before the criminal cases review commission’s (CCRC) announcement that they were referring killer Simon Hall’s murder conviction back to the court of appeal (CoA), Campbell Malone was quoted by the Guardian;
“What worries me is that to an unusually substantial degree this case turns on one area of evidence – fibre evidence” said Hall’s lawyer, Campbell Malone.
“There are, on the one hand, other potential explanations for the transfer of the fibres, and there are question marks about the reliability of the fibre evidence that we would expect to support it, which has troubled me.
Also, we are aware that there has been continuing research in the approach to be taken with fibre evidence, which has moved on from the way that evidence was gathered and presented in [Hall’s] case”
Campbell Malone via an article by Natalie Hanman for the Guardian dated the 21st of July 2009
Campbell Malone was described on Twitter as “our appeals supremo” by Stephensons solicitors, following the CCRC’s announcement that they had referred Simon Hall’s murder conviction back to the CoA in 2009;
Note: *Tom Parkes article falsely stated that Simon Hall’s then wife Stephanie (Hall) “met him when they both worked at a company in East Hill, Colchester”. Simon Hall met Stephanie Bon at a company in East Hill, Colchester not Stephanie (Hall).
Correna Platt
Correna Plattwho trained under Campbell Malone, began representing killer Simon Hall after Campbell’s semi retirement just before Simon Hall’s appeal was heard in December 2010.
Correna Platt
Corenna Platt made a statement following the court of appeals decision to uphold Simon Hall’s murder conviction;
His legal team are concerned by the approach taken by the Court in coming to this decision.
It was agreed by all that this conviction rested entirely on expert evidence relating to fibre evidence and there is much other evidence that pointed away from Simon’s guilt.
As questioned in previous Parts of the this blog series, it is still not known why Simon Spence seemingly did not point out to the CoA judges that the CCRC had cherry picked from the prosecutions closing speech from killer Simon Hall’s February 2003 trial.
The CCRC, and seemingly the CoA judges were seen to be able to magic away the Hall families “concocted” evidence, which again Graham Parkin the prosecution barrister had stated during the February 2003 was “woven into the general framework of the case”.
Jon Robins
Jon Robins
Four months before the innocence fraud scam related to actual, factual guilty killer Simon Hall began to unravel, Jon Robins published an article to his website under the header Wrongly accused: a need for ‘imagination and outrage, which also included statements made by Campbell Malone;
“We’re back where we were in the late 1980s”, argued Campbell Malone, the veteran defence lawyer and miscarriage of justice campaigner at a debate in Manchester last week.
“We have a conservative and cautious Court of Appeal which has a deep-rooted scepticism of what they regard as the miscarriage of justice industry. That is supported by a lack of interest in the media”.
Campbell Malone, a consultant with Stephensons solicitors, was talking at the second debate about Wrongly accused: Who is responsible for investigating miscarriages of justice?
By Jon Robins for the Justice Gao article headed dated
Two Months Before The Innocence Fraud Scam Began To Unravel
Campbell Malone continued to act as a “criminal appeals consultant” for Stephensons solicitors and published a blog in September 2012, two months before killer Simon Hall and Jamie Barker’s Zenith Windows burglary became known about by his then wife Stephanie (Hall).
Stephensons solicitors indicated to Stephanie (Hall) that killer Simon Hall’s Zenith Windows burglary “omission” would not alter Simon’s “position” as an appellant.
Emily Bolton and husband Clive Stafford Smith
Campbell Malone’s blog was headed Where lies the truth in criminal defence cases? and included a reference to Clive Stafford Smith, husband of Emily Bolton who has promoted the innocence fraud of people like violent rapist and con man Andrew (Andy) Malkinson.
Tap on the button below for the index to the ongoing blog series on violent rapist Andrew Malkinson and his spin campaign;
Campbell Malone’s blog also made reference to a book headed “Where Lies the Truth” by Michael O’Connell, as well as the conviction of George Kelly, who murdered Leonard Thomas and John Catterall in 1949 and was executed on 28 March 1950.
The CCRC also referred George Kelly’s murder conviction was also referred to the CoA, who quashed his conviction posthumously, deeming his conviction ‘unsafe’.
An unsafe conviction however does not equate to factual innocence and it’s possible the CCRC used the same (or similar) deceptive tactics they used when they referred Simon Hall’s murder conviction in 2009.
Towards the end of 2012 Simon Hall decided to dispose of the services of his solicitor Corenna Platt and Michael Naughton from Bristol university became his representative instead.
It was during the time that Michael Naughton represented killer Simon Hall, that his factual guilt to his murder of Joan Albert began to unravel and was eventually exposed.
John Curtis
John Curtis ~ Case review manager at the criminal cases review commission
In 2015 John Curtis, who was the CCRC’s case review manager for killer Simon Hall, wrote an article which was shamefully headed Righting Wrongs.
John Curtis stated on the CCRC;
The Commission’s contribution to society is important.
Miscarriages of justice remain a reality, as are the challenges to the organisation charged with their investigation
Excerpt by John Curtis for Counsel magazine article headedRighting wrongs dated the 12th of January 2015
In 2016 Corenna Platt went on to take part in a two part BBC TV show calledConviction: Murder at the Station with Louise Shorter, which promoted the innocence fraud of PaulaPoulton’s killer.
INNOCENCE FRAUD WATCH 