Tag: Abuse by proxy

Nadia Sawalha From The TV Show Loose Women & Her Husband Mark Adderley On The Loyalty Of Psychopathic Serial Killer Lucy Letby’s “Deluded” Friends & Violent Rapist, Parasitic Predator & Convicted Fraudster Andrew Malkinson (Part 43)

Bad Judge Of Character

During a 22nd of August 2023 YouTube video partly titled LOYALTY of Lucy Letby’s “Deluded” FRIENDS Mark Adderley and Nadia Sawalha, who are husband and wife, talked about psychopathic serial killer Lucy Letby and the loyalty of her friends.

Referring to a friend of Lucy Letby, Mark Adderley stated;

Can we be such a profoundly bad judge of character

I mean that in of itself is not a crime for them to not believe what’s she done

I mean vast numbers of people could not believe she was doing what she was doing

Which is why you could argue this has happened

But is it the pressures of, of female friendship

Are their pressures around staying friends and loyal

Despite what your friends are and who they are

Mark Adderley – Source here

A male “best friend” of serial killer Lucy Letby spoke to Ricky Killeen here.

Lucy Letby’s friend gives the impression he has accepted she is guilty, but has chosen to remain loyal to her (for now at least).

Ricky Killeen asked Lucy Letby’s friend how he could stick by her, to which Roger (not his real name) stated;

She’s very damaged I think would be the right word

Erm again you’ve sort of asked me why, you know, main question I’d say that you’d be wondering and why a lot of people would be asking why have you actually stuck with her

And my honest thoughts that I will say in the case is that obviously a lot of people will plead guilty to an offence

And then they’ll go down the path of mitigation and try and persuade a court to reduce their sentence on the basis of well I had X, Y and Z going on, this contributed to why I did what I did

Now in my opinion, I mean I don’t particularly talk to Lucy about the case when I see her

But in my opinion if she had gone down that route and pled guilty to the charges and tried to mitigate for them

I think it would have potentially been the difference between a forty, fifty year sentence from a whole life order which she got

I also think it may have been the difference between immediate detention in a prison verses a secure hospital or something like that

Obviously I’m not, you know, I can’t pretend I’m any sort of expert in these matters

I’ve tried to educate myself through the course of the case in these past three or four years to try and find out as much as I can

But as a friend it wouldn’t be fair to her to say some of what I know but there are factors in play that I think would have explained her actions

Not excuse them, you can’t excuse what’s she’s done

But would have explained them

Because she hasn’t had the completely perfect upbringing and you know, eh sort of childhood that’s been painted in the press, that’s what I will say

Statements of male friend of Lucy Letby

Extraordinarily Manipulative

Nadia Sawalha responded to her husband Mark Adderley by stating;

Well I think there’s like a couple of things in there

First of all I think that you should never be attacked if you have had a bad judge of character

Because I think people can be extraordinarily manipulative

I mean a narcissistic psychopath

Or a narcissist is often the most cunning person you will ever come across in your life

And they will stop at nothing to play the game

To make you believe that they are somebody that they’re not

So to ever be attacked for that I think is just, is just wrong

Nadia Sawalha – Source here

Still referring to serial killer Lucy Letby and her friends loyalty, Nadia Sawalha then went on to state;

They really, really believe she didn’t do this

And maybe why they talking out is that they’re very, very scared

Because they believe that whoever did do it is still doing it

That’s the other thing that you’ve got to think about

Like why would you come forward and say it because you know you’re gonna get shit

But A – if you passionately believe that your friend is gonna get wrongly convicted

You’re also gonna have to passionately believe that the person is still out there, who’s done this

And therefore more babies are in danger

Nadia Sawalha – Source here (at around 14:01)

A “Wrongful Conviction” Or Miscarriage Of Justice Does Not Equate To Actual, Factual Innocence

In response to the above husband Mark Adderley agreed with his wife stating “”yes, yes, yeah” to which Nadia Sawalha then stated;

It’s like the guy you know

Who just did seventeen years for rape

Andrew Macklesphere (Malkinson)

You know, I listened to all his podcasts actually before he was released

And his terror at the thought that that man was still out there

I mean he stayed in prison for so much longer than he needed to

Because he’d said if I admitted..

At some point the person that did this must be put away

Because he was so dangerous

And he did like, he did like seven more years because he refused to say he did it when he hadn’t done it

Nadia Sawalha – Source here

Nadia Sawalha went on to state;

But, but not all verdicts are..

I 100% believe that she did it and I’m very glad that she’s gonna be put away for life

But I’ve just given another example of a man that has been put away for seventeen years, not

Verdicts are not always right

So often people are in prison that shouldn’t be

But what if she is

Well she is

A narcissist

Narcissists lie, so

They are the greatest actors

So I feel sorry for her friends

I don’t feel angry for her friends

Because I’ve seen many narcissists in my life

And I’ve seen many people, victims of narcissists

Nadia Sawalha – Source here

Violent rapist, parasitic predator and convicted fraudster Andrew Malkinson was originally arrested for attempted murder and rape.

However he was found guilty of attempting to “choke, asphyxiate or strangle” his victim and two counts of rape.

Andrew Malkinson was released from prison in December 2020.

The first part of the extraordinarily manipulative podcast Seventeen Years did not air until September 2021 – which was the year after Andrew Malkinson was released from North Sea Camp open prison.

Narcissistic Rapist Andrew Malkinson Was & Is Forensically Aware

It is not known exactly why Andrew Malkinson was denied parole and spent extra years in prison, although he has alleged it was because he refused to admit his guilt.

However Andrew Malkinson has never provided any proof to support his claims and has instead chosen to hide the parole boards actual decisions from the public.

Andrew Malkinson comes across as a raging narcissist who could well have attacked other women before he was arrested in August 2003.

As already stated in Part 37 of this blog series here there was an article published in May 2016 which was titled ‘Forensically aware’: Bob Woffinden on the shocking case of Andy Malkinson in which Andrew Malkinson (via writer Bob Woffinden) claimed his violent attack and rapes never happened and his victim had made everything up.

Writers Will Roe and Emily Dugan chose to omit this fact from their manipulative innocence fraud narrative, which was their Seventeen Years podcast series.

It is worth reading here what Andrew Malkinson was saying via Bob Woffinden about his victim back in 2016.

Writer Bob Woffinden also stated in 2016;

In 2003, during one of his occasional trips back to the UK to visit his mother, he was arrested at her home for attempted murder and double rape

Bob Woffinden

In Part 2 of Will Roe and Emily Dugan’s Seventeen Years podcast, this was again changed by Andrew Malkinson, who stated at around 17:00;

I’ll go and see my mum so I went to Grimsby to see my mum ‘cos I hadn’t seen her for a long time.

Changed my plans like I always do you know I’m – I’m a traveller

Andrew Malkinson

It is not known if Andrew Malkinson ever visited his mother Trish Hose or if she ever made a police witness statement.

In reality Andrew Malkinson seemingly fled from the area of his attack after he learned his victim was helping the police compose an E-fit.

None of Andrew Malkinson stories add up, including why he got his work colleague Simon Oakes to drop his off at Manchester airport and told Simon he was going back to Holland.

Andrew Malkinson was apprehended by the police on the 1st August 2003, while he was staying in a salivation army hostel in Grimsby.

To date Andrew Malkinson has failed to explain what he did with the clothing and footwear he wore while working as a security guard in Ellesmere shopping centre, Walkden and which his victim described he was wearing when he attacked her.

Forensically Aware Andrew Malkinson Has Not Proved His Actual, Factual Innocence

The appeal court judge, who told Andrew Malkinson in July 2023 he was “free” to leave the court, did not declare Andrew Malkinson innocent.

As previously stated, Andrew Malkinson had been “free” since December 2020.

The court of appeal quashed Andrew Malkinson’s convictions, which does not equate to a finding of actual, factual innocence.

The mainstream media, and many others, have falsely claimed Andrew Malkinson was “cleared” and many have also stated he “didn’t commit” his violent attack and rapes.

In reality – this was, and is, propaganda.

A minute speck of someone else’s DNA was found on the vest top of Andrew Malkinson’s victim.

Andrew Malkinson’s victims vest top was covered by her fleece jacket, which was still zipped up when she regained consciousness.

Therefore it is extremely likely, the minute speck of DNA, which could have been a minute flake of sloughed off skin, was picked up somewhere else, either hours, days, or weeks earlier and before Andrew Malkinson’s 2003 attack. And was not therefore related to any crime.

The fact the man, referred to as Mr B, who’s DNA has been linked to this minute speck of DNA has not been charged with any crime, suggests this was secondary transfer DNA or background DNA.

The defence expert claimed in their report, which was referred to during Andrew Malkinson’s July 2023 appeal, this minute speck of DNA was “crime specific”.

But again, in reality, this minute speck of DNA also could have been picked up by Andrew Malkinson’s victim anywhere along the route she walked home that morning.

There has been zero evidence presented to suggest violent rapist Andrew Malkinson should not have been in prison.

Andrew Malkinson’s victim has been ghosted by the mainstream media.

The Spin Public Relations Campaign Of Violent Rapist, Convicted Fraudster, Former Amateur Boxer & Innocence Fraudster Andrew Malkinson AKA Andrew Strugnell

Killer Luke Mitchell: More On Remorseless Murderer Sean Patrick Toal & How Easily He Lies For Another Guilty Murderer & Robber & Violent Con Scott C Forbes (Part 304)

During a video which aired on the 12th November 2023 killer Sean Toal and Scott Forbes spoke about sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell.

Killer Sean Toal was referred to in Part 301 of this blog series, which can be read by tapping on the button below;

PART 301 Remorseless Murderer Sean Patrick Toal Aka Social Sessions Aka @seanaldo1985, Scammer Sandra Lean’s Silence On The Trial Transcripts, The WAP Website & Organised Crime

Read more about Scott Forbes in Part 275 below;

PART 275 Fraudster, Convicted Robber & Violent Con Scott C Forbes & His Alleged Threats To Solicitor Graham Mann

During the video killer Sean Toal and Scott Forbes told many outrageous lies.

The following is some dialogue between the pair of innocence fraudsters;

So the police are now driving people about

They’ve been over the wall of a crime scene

Come on anybody with any..

Scott Forbes

Is this the local police then

Sean Toal

Aye started off with the local police and then Dobbie and that arrived

He was a detective superintendent for Edinburgh

Scott Forbes

But this time the place have already let..

Sean Toal

Aye they’ve allowed people to go home covered in Jodi’s blood

Scott Forbes

And what was Dobbie’s answer to that

Sean Toal

Ah he just says ach we’ve carri.. our investigation was the finest police work that we’ve ever carried out

Scott Forbes

So there’s people there that have been involved in finding the body

They’re covered in blood

They don’t get questioned

They get drove about Dalkeith and then they pick on Luke

Sean Toal

Detective chief superintendent Craig Dobbie was not appointed as senior investigating officer until gone 03:00hrs, by which time all the family members had left the scene.

And no one was “covered in blood” like killer Sean Toal stated!

This is another intentional bare faced lie!

Alice Walker was the only person to have gone near her grand-daughter Jodi Jones’ body and Alice had said she might have touched her grand-daughters forehead.

The intentional bare faced lie about Alice Walker “cradling” her grand-daughter body was started by sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell!

Janine Jones, Steven Kelly and Alice Walker were driven directly to Newbattle police station, they were not “drove about” Dalkeith like killer Sean Toal stated and they didn’t go home until after they had been at the police station – where they were asked questions.

Pages 806 and 807 of Janine Jones’ trial testimony describes some of what happened in the early hours of the morning of 1st July 2003;

Tap on the button below to read more, directly from trial transcripts;

LINKS to TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS

Link to Part 305 here

Killer Luke Mitchell: Remorseless Murderer Sean Patrick Toal Aka Social Sessions Aka @seanaldo1985, Scammer Sandra Lean’s Silence On The Trial Transcripts, The WAP Website & Organised Crime (Part 301)

Murderer Sean Toal
Scammer Sandra Lean

Paul Gerard McGilveray (20) was murdered on 8 August 2004 by Sean Patrick Toal.

On 26 July 2005 at Glasgow high court, Sean Toal was found guilty for his murder. Read more by tapping on the button below;

15 YEARS FOR THE SADISTIC PARTY KILLER

Scammer Sandra Lean and her former boyfriend, un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton were involved in killer Sean Toal’s public relations innocence fraud spin campaign:

PART 258 Innocence Fraud Scammers Sandra Lean & Un-Convicted Baby Murderer Billy Middleton From Defunct WAP Website On Guilty Murderer Sean Toal

Excerpts from a July 2023 media article stated of killer Sean Toal;

The thug fought to overturn his sentence and forced his victim’s mum to go to court 36 times.

Now Toal has completed a law degree and is preparing to launch his own crime podcast.

He has also thrown his weight behind Luke Mitchell, who was convicted of killing girlfriend Jodi Jones, 14, in Dalkeith, Midlothian in 2003.

Excerpts by Alice Walker for the Scottish Sun article headed Brazen murderer stabbed our son to death – now he’s launching a crime podcast about ‘justice’, he has no remorse dated 3rd July 2023

In reality – killers Sean Toal and Luke Mitchell had been cohorts since at least 2010.

Sandra Lean has remained (publicly) silent since her bare faced lies, disinformation and misinformation are being exposed by trial transcripts but she recently commented on murderer Sean Toal on Facebook;

Nicola Brennan, who was referred to in Part 296 here commented on Sandra’s post;

Whilst over on X Heather Brunt, who was referred to in Part 288 here also tweeted on killer Sean Toal – commenting on how fraudster Scott Forbes “worked on his case”;

Tap on the button below to read more about fraudster Scott Forbes;

PART 275 Fraudster, Convicted Robber & Violent Con Scott C Forbes & His Alleged Threats To Solicitor Graham Mann

Killer Sean Toal also refers to himself as Social Sessions on various social media platforms, as well as @seanaldo1985 on X.

Social Sessions tweeted Neil MacKay on the 4th December 2023;

Neil MacKay was involved in the fraudulent 2021 channel 5 TV show Murder In A Small Town. Neil MacKay was referred to in Parts 261 and 265 of this ongoing blog series, both of which can be read by tapping on the buttons below;

PART 261 Neil MacKay From The 2021 Innocence Fraud TV Show “Murder In A Small Town”, His Alleged “Phone Call” From “A Senior Police Officer” In 2003/04 & His “Jail” Visit With The Murderer & Conversation With Murderers Mother Corinne Mitchell
PART 265 Where Is The Evidence Neil MacKay Visited Murderer Luke Mitchell & Why Would An Alleged “Senior Police Officer” Linked To The Original Investigation Have Contacted A Random Reporter In Glasgow?

On the 7th December 2023 killer Sean Toal asked John Halley to message him.

John Halley was arrested in March 2023 for sex offences (Read more here) and had also been promoting scammer Sandra Lean’s nonsense on social media, although he too has recently gone quiet on this.

Again – since trial transcripts have been published, Sandra Lean has remained silent

Tap on the button below for links to trial transcripts;

PART 295 FREE Book – Betraying The Innocent Using Psychological Manipulation, Intentional Bare Faced Lies, Disinformation & Misinformation By Innocence Fraud Phenomenon Grifter Sandra Lean

Link to Part 302 here

The Continuous Manipulation By Emily Dugan & Violent Rapist, Parasitic Predator & Convicted Fraudster Andrew Malkinson, His “Rolling Stone Life” & Living In A Tent (Part 42)

Andrew Malkinson in 2023

Before rapist Andrew Malkinson was convicted for his June 2003 violent attack and rapes in February 2004, he had spent time in a prison in Thailand.

The actual, factual details regarding Andrew Malkinson’s fraudulent crimes, which saw him imprisoned before he flew to the UK in 2003, remain sketchy.

In May 2016 writer Bob Woffinden published excerpts from a letter Andrew Malkinson had written to him from prison.

Referring to his time before being sent to prison Andrew Malkinson stated;

I had a ‘rolling stone’ life.

The work you are doing is generally seasonal, so you’re always looking to move on.

You have your freedom but little else.

Sometimes people are envious when you tell them of your travels, as though you’ve had more advantages in life than they have.

But you aren’t staying at the Ritz. More likely, you’ve paid a few dollars for a stinking hell-hole down the Khao San Road in Bangkok.

The advantage is that there isn’t time for things to go stale.

You are always meeting new people and facing fresh challenges. Some might find it an insecure lifestyle, but it suited me.

I left Amsterdam on 16 May 2003 with a return ticket to Gran Canaria.

Excerpts from a letter written by Andrew Malkinson to Bob Woffinden: The Nicholas Cases, published in May 2016

It is still not known why Andrew Malkinson did not use his return ticket to fly back from Gran Canaria to Amsterdam in 2003.

However on the 18th October 2023, writer Emily Dugan published yet another article in which she quoted Andrew Malkinson, who stated;

I want to know all the details of exactly how and why [this] happened.

Because I can’t rest until I know.

It’s my life and the suffering is incalculable.

Oceans of tears I’ve suffered because of that.

And I want to know why

Statement by Andrew Malkinson via a Guardian article by Emily Dugan headed Andrew Malkinson says wrongful rape conviction inquiry should be statutory dated 18th October 2023

The public still do not know what Andrew Malkinson did with the clothing and footwear he was wearing on the night he attacked his victim.

There has been zero evidence presented to demonstrate that Andrew Malkinson didn’t commit his violent attack and rapes in 2003, however Emily Dugan stated;

Malkinson spent the summer living on his former partner’s houseboat in Holland before going on a road trip through France and Portugal to Seville in a friend’s van.

This was the freedom he dreamed of while spending 17 years in prison for a rape he didn’t commit, but now he has it, it is also a painful reminder of what he lost.

“That sense of freedom was stolen from me for 20 years and very nearly for the rest of my life. I’ll never forgive them for that.”

His home is now a compact grey and orange tent, his one concession to luxury an inflatable airbed. He is subsisting on very little, knowing it is likely to be two years before he sees any compensation because he is planning a civil claim.

“You need financial freedom to be truly free, don’t you? And I don’t have that,” he said, speaking to the Guardian in the London offices of his lawyers at the justice charity Appeal.

“It’s a tough time because there’s so much uncertainty. I’m living in a tent, I’m living on benefits. I want some resolution.”

The toll on him is obvious. He keeps losing his thread in conversation and his hands shake. “It’s definitely affecting my mental health,” he said. “I’m struggling.”

In April 2022 Emily Dugan stated in an article she wrote for the times here, that Andrew Malkinson was living in “a small flat in a seaside town”.

What happened to this flat?

And is the reason Andrew Malkinson “keeps losing his thread in conversation” and that his hands keep shaking down to alcohol withdrawal?

Prior to his arrest in 2003, Andrew Malkinson had been kicked out of the home of the Hardman family, after he urinated on their sofa whilst drunk.

Andrew Malkinson also stated that the reason his relationship with his son’s mother broke down was that he was “drinking (Alcohol) a lot more than” he “should”.

Link to Part 43 here

It’s No Mystery Who Killed Jill Dando! (Part 5)

Assassin Barry George

On the 26th of April 1999 Jill Dando (37) was murdered by sexual predator, serial stalker, rapist and assassin Barry George.

Barry George shot Jill Dando whilst she was on the doorstep of her home in Gowan avenue Fulham, which is in Southwest London. 

A jury found Barry George guilty of his murder on the 2nd July 2001.

Murderer Barry George

Not long after Barry George was found guilty, he confessed to his murder in 2002.

In the same year he confessed to his murder, Barry George appealed his conviction but his appeal was dismissed.

However on the 20th June 2007 the fraudsters at the criminal cases review commission referred Barry George’s murder conviction to the court of appeal.

The court of appeal went on to deem Barry George’s murder conviction “unsafe” and ordered a re-trial.

On the 9th June 2008 he stood trial for a second time and on the 1st August 2008 Barry George was found not guilty.

A not guilty verdict does not equate to actual, factual innocence.

Less than two years after they referred killer Barry George’s murder conviction to the court of appeal, the fraudsters at the criminal cases review commission referred the murder conviction of killer Simon Hall.

The Truth Behind Actual, Factual, Guilty Killer Simon Hall & His & His Deceitful Enablers Innocence Fraud Phenomenon Scam blog series goes into some of the facts of this innocence fraud.

Michael Mansfield

Michael Mansfield

Michael Mansfield, who first represented killer Barry George during his appeal also represented killer Simon Hall.

Fibre evidence, which was one of the factors which helped convict killer Simon Hall, still links Barry George to his murder.

Gun shot residue matching the gunshot residue found at Barry George’s crime scene also still links him to his murder.

Michael Naughton

Michael Naughton, who campaigned for and represented killer Simon Hall when their innocence fraud was exposed in 2012/13, went on to write the foreword of killer Barry George’s sister’s book.

Michelle Diskin Bates

Assassin Barry George & his sister Michelle Diskin Bates

Michelle Diskin Bates, who appears to be a deluded fantasist similar to her killer brother, has gone on to align herself with numerous other dangerous murderers, including mass murderer, child killer and rapist Jeremy Bamber.

In August 2016 liar and fantasist Michelle Diskin Bates made the claim she was watching nighttime TV back in August 1985 – even though nighttime TV did not exist in the UK until 1986.

Michelle Diskin Bates stated here;

It was well after midnight on August 6th 1985 and I couldn’t sleep. Switching on the T.V., I absent-mindedly tuned into a news channel. We were living in Co. Cork, in Southern Ireland, and I was joyfully awaiting the birth of our first child who was already overdue, making me feel restless; that was why I was up and about at such an hour.

Becoming aware of a breaking-news story I began to listen in more closely. A siege was taking place at a farmhouse in England. The broadcaster relayed that five people were inside and there was great fear for their safety. As the story unfolded it became apparent that this was an older couple. A farmer and retired Magistrate, Nevill Bamber and his wife, June; their daughter, Sheila, and her six year old twin sons. Jeremy, their son, was outside with police who were trying to communicate with someone inside the house who had been seen pacing back and forth in front of an upstairs window and carrying a firearm. The reporter said that police were reluctant to get too close to the house for fear of causing that person to become more agitated, thereby, escalating the danger to the family. I watched for an hour or so but there was no resolution and, heavily pregnant, I became exhausted and had to go off to bed

Michelle Diskin Bates

When Barry George was released from custody, following his 2008 re-trial, he was placed under MAPPA (multi-agency public protection arrangements) restrictions due to his dangerousness, especially towards women.

Link to Part 6 HERE

Will The Ministry Of Justice Be Awarding Compensation To Violent Rapist, Parasitic Predator & Convicted Fraudster (Thailand 2001) Andrew Malkinson’s VICTIM & If Not Why Not? (Part 33)

Media Spin & Compensating Violent Rapist Andrew Malkinson’s VICTIM

The mainstream media are continuing to spin violent rapist, parasitic predator and convicted fraudster (Thailand 2001) Andrew Malkinson’s position.

His violent convictions were found to be “unsafe” by the court of appeal on the 26th July 2023.

The court of appeal did NOT find Andrew Malkinson “innocent” or “clear” him per se.

Will the ministry of justice be awarding compensation to Andrew Malkinson’s victim and if not why not?

A minute trace of undated, circumstantial DNA found on a piece of clothing worn by Andrew Malkinson’s victim does not erase all the other evidence which points to Andrew Malkinson and only Andrew Malkinson.

It is not known when Andrew Malkinson’s victim could have picked up this background circumstantial DNA, apparently belonging to a Mr B, who was almost 10 years younger than Malkinson.

Andrew Malkinson’s victim said her attacker was in his “early-to-mid” 30’s,

NOT his early 20’s – which is how old Mr B would have been in July 2003.

Some of the evidence which led to Andrew Malkinson’s convictions has been explored in this ongoing blog series, the index for which can be found by tapping on the button below;

The Spin Public Relations Campaign Of Violent, Rapist, Fraudster & Former Amateur Boxer Andrew Malkinson (AKA Andrew Strugnell) & The Criminal Cases Review Commissions & Their “Special Powers”

Link to Part 34 here

Violent Rapist Andrew Malkinson & How Forensic Scientists Had Previously Said It Was Impossible To Know If The Undated, Circumstantial DNA Was Associated With The Case, The Criminal Cases Review Commission & His VICTIMS Zipped Up Fleece Top (Part 30)

Violent rapist Andrew Malkinson in July 2023

“Mr B” Arrested In December 2022

In December 2022 it was reported that a Mr B had been arrested by police in Exeter after a minuscule amount of his undated, circumstantial DNA was said to have been found on violent rapist Andrew Malkinson’s victims clothing.

Mr B was reported to be 48 years of age at the time of his arrest, meaning he was almost 10 years younger than Andrew Malkinson.

Andrew Malkinson’s victim had described her attacker as being in his “early-to-mid” 30’s.

NOT his early 20’s!

Obviously Impossible To Inflict Wound Without Removing Clothing

Writer Bob Woffinden stated on behalf of Andrew Malkinson in 2016;

The scientists considered whether the profile did match someone on the national DNA database, but then decided that it probably didn’t.

The FSS (Forensic science service) conceded that it is impossible to know which bodily fluid it derives from, or whether it is associated with the case.

It was because of the partially-severed nipple on the left breast that the prosecution was able to emphasise to the jury just what a vicious attack this had been.

Yet this evidence should be examined properly.

There was saliva staining at the site, from which a DNA profile was obtained, but it didn’t match Malkinson (though the profile could have matched the boyfriend); and the clothing on the upper body was not disarranged.

(The VICTIM’S).. fleece remained zipped up throughout and her bra remained in place.

It would have been obviously impossible for Malkinson to have inflicted the wound without disturbing the clothing.

Excerpts from Bob Woffinden’s book The Nicholas Cases published in May 2016

The miniscule undated, circumstantial DNA profile did not match “the boyfriend”.

When the criminal cases review commission referred violent rapist and convicted fraudster (Thailand 2001) Andrew Malkinson’s convictions to the appeal court they stated;

The new DNA evidence found by the CCRC does not prove that the man on the DNA database committed these or any offences. 

Statement by the CCRC here dated 24th July 2023

If it was “obviously impossible” for violent rapist Andrew Malkinson “to have inflicted the wound without disturbing the clothing” in 2016 – why the double standards around Mr B in 2023?

Bob Woffinden also stated in relation to Andrew Malkinson’s victim;

There is also the matter of what happened to her at around 3.40am when she told her boyfriend that she had ‘found somewhere warm and dry’ and was ‘safe’.

Her calls were then discontinued for about 45 minutes. This is another unexplained part of the case.

Excerpts from Bob Woffinden’s book The Nicholas Cases published in May 2016

Could this be where and when the background circumstantial DNA of Mr B’s was picked up.

The Zipped Up Fleece

How would anyone be able to bite through the material of a fleece, a vest top and a bra – none of which had holes or teeth marks on or in them.

Part of Edward Henry’s argument during the appeal hearing was;

..commonly found in saliva

Which lies directly above the bra

And the reason why the bra is stained in blood is because her attacker virtually severed the nipple of her left breast

No teeth marks were found

But presumably biting through clothing

Practically severing the nipple of her left breast

And as we state at paragraph 9 the images help to illustrate why the jury would have been entitled to conclude that Mr B deposited his DNA on the area of potential saliva staining on the upper left area of the complainants vest top, while biting and severing her left nipple

And then I do not need to erm go further than that

Statements made by Edward Henry at around 34:04 here dated 26th July 2023

It is not known what Edward Henry said before he used the words “..commonly found” as the audio again dropped out at this point of the hearing, as was referred to in Part 21 of this ongoing blog series, which can be read by tapping on the button below;

PART 21 What Did Edward Henry Say When The Microphone Dropped Out During Appeal Hearing Of Violent Rapist & Convicted Fraudster Andrew Malkinson 

Link to Part 31 here

Will The Court Of Appeal Judges Address The Misleading Evidence Presented To Them In Relation To Violent Rapist & Convicted Fraudster Andrew Malkinson (Part 29)

As already pointed out in Part 27 of this ongoing blog series, which can be read by tapping on the button below;

Can The Court Of Appeal Judges Clarify What The Exact Date Was That Pc Waite & Pc Baybutt Visited Violent Rapist & Convicted Fraudster Andrew Malkinson At Ellesmere Shopping Centre. Edward Henry Stated It Was The “Day After” (20th July), Bob Woffinden Stated It Was The 21st July & The CCRC Stated It Was The 25th July 2003 (Part 27)

Misleading evidence was presented to the three judges presiding over the appeal hearing of violent rapist and convicted fraudster Andrew Malkinson.

Saturday 19th July 2003: Was the date of Andrew Malkinson’s Violent Attack & Rapes

Sunday 20th July 2003: Was the date Edward Henry claimed to the appeal judges police constables (Pc’s) Chris Baybutt & Gary Waite visited Andrew Malkinson at work

Your lordships the very next morning, purely as a result of a hunch, when the description of the attacker had been recited to them, the night before at the scene, police constable Waite and police constable Baybutt, on hearing the description of the attacker said ‘that’s Andrew Malkinson’ because about a month before they had stopped him erm, he hadn’t committed any offence, but he was seen riding pillion on the back of a young Mr Hardman’s moped

And they had stopped him, so as a result of the hunch they went to see him the following day

Immediately the day after the attack at his place of work

Statements by Edward Henry during Andrew Malkinson’s appeal hearing on 26th July 2023 here

Monday 21st July 2003: Said to be the date the VICTIM in this case gave her police witness statement

Monday 21st July 2003: Was the date Andrew Malkinson stated in 2016 (via writer Bob Woffinden) that Pc’s Baybutt & Waite visited him at work

The evidence was that at 2.00pm on the day of the attack two community beat officers, after hearing the description of the attacker, had ‘immediately’ and ‘simultaneously’ named Malkinson as the suspect.

Why would anyone, having heard of the attacker’s ‘smart’ clothes, instantly think of the generally dishevelled Malkinson?

Secondly, two days later, on Monday 21 July, the officers saw Malkinson at work.

Excerpts by Bob Woffinden’s taken from chapter 5 of his book The Nicholas cases

Friday 25th July 2003: The date the CCRC submitted to the appeal court judges that Pc’s Baybutt & Waite visited Andrew Malkinson at work

My learned friend and the respondent says that the commission has over stated this matter

In fact actually if we go to the statement of reason, eh and if I may ask you, and if I do erm ask you very briefly my lords to go to page 114, eh and eh paragraph 165

Forgive me 164, this is what the commission said

‘This is significant because the trial judge raised the question of whether the victim was mistaken about having scratched her attacker at all and told the jury that if she may have scratched her attacker then the person responsible for the attack cannot be the defendant

Dr Anderson’s mistake allowed the judge to suggest that the victim may have been mistaken in her account of scratching her attacker. This undermined an important defence point made by Mr Malkinson’s counsel at trial that the fact that Mr Malkinson was not injured or disfigured in anyway when he was seen by the police on the 25th of July, six days after the attack, meant that he could not have been the attacker’

With the greatest respect to my learned friend but also to the commission, erm the commission erm got that wrong

It was the very next day

Statements by Edward Henry during Andrew Malkinson’s appeal on 26th July 2023 at around 1:14:44 here

Who Was & Is Wrong?

It is not clear who was and is wrong in relation to the date Pc’s Chris Baybutt and Gary Waite visited Ellesmere shopping centre.

However it was reported that both Pc’s Baybutt and Waite were “recommended for a commendation” by Judge Michael Henshall, who presided over the February 2004 trial, for helping to bring violent rapist Andrew Malkinson to justice.

Link to Part 30 here

Killer Luke Mitchell: Open Your Eyes To The Continuous Blatant & Bare Faced Lies & Manipulation Of Scammer Sandra Lean On Sadistic Dalkeith Murderer – “Isn’t it amazing how quickly we forget” (Part 266)

Scammer Sandra Lean

Liar and scammer Sandra Lean stated on the 23rd July 2023 on actual, factual guilty murderer Luke Mitchell;

..a 35 year old man

Who has never driven a car

Let me see I’ve got a list of what he’s never done

He’s never driven a car

Had a legal drink

Had a job

Shopped for his own needs

“Shopped For His Own Needs”

Chris Taylor and Harry Williamson’s 17th June 2023 article for the Scottish Sun here headed;

evidenced killer Luke Mitchell shopping “for his own needs” and contained many quotes of statements made by the killer including the following;

I visited a few shops — bought some toiletries, bought some games, bought some food

Sadistic killer Luke Mitchell

Had An Illegal Drink

Killer Luke Mitchell may not have had a “legal drink” but he most definitely drunk illegally before he was sent to prison.

There are photographs online of killer Luke Mitchell’s bedroom with bottles of alcohol clearly visible on the top shelf of his pine unit, as can be seen in the copy of the photograph below next to Beavis and Butt-Head;

Sandra Lean also stated;

Isn’t it amazing how quickly we forget

Sandra Lean – 23rd July 2023

A Few Days After Killer Luke Mitchell’s 2003 Police Interview

Sandra Lean might want to remind herself of Grace McLean’s 22nd January 2005 Daily Mail article headed “I’m simply not a normal teenager: EXCLUSIVE: Luke Mitchell’s chilling boast to the Mail“.

Journalist Grace McLean first met with killer Luke Mitchell and his mother Corinne Mitchell a few days after his section 14 interview which took place on the 14th of August 2003.

Grace McLean stated;

I interviewed Mitchell months before he had been charged with the murder of Jodi, and days after he had been questioned by detectives hunting for her killer

Grace McLean

Grace McLean also met with killer Luke Mitchell “four weeks” before he was arrested in April 2004.

It appears killer Luke Mitchell orchestrated their meeting.

What is clear is that around this time the killer and his mother were courting the media, as is also evidenced by the Sky TV interview on the day of Jodi Jones funeral with James Matthews.

A copy of Grace McLean’s article has been reproduced below;

THE words coming out of his mouth were enough to chill the heart.

His voice flat and emotionless, Luke Mitchell was describing to me the moment he discovered the body of his girlfriend, mutilated and abandoned on the muddy earth.

For the schoolgirl who died an unspeakable death, horrifically mutilated, there was no expression of love from Luke Mitchell – and no tears.

This was Luke’s story in his own words – the account the jury never heard as the teenager never gave evidence during his trial.

“My torch lit up the path like daytime and I was about 12 yards from Jodi when I saw her lying there” he began.

“She was so white. Her throat had been slit and her head was to the side.

“Her eyes were staring up at me and she was naked but for a pair of socks, I think… no, she wasn’t wearing anything. Her body was so white and she was just staring and staring.

‘”I shouted to the others but I couldn’t tell them I’d found Jodi because I didn’t want to upset her gran, but she said she wanted to come over the wall.

‘The others held her back but she scrambled over the wall and said if her granddaugher was there she wanted to be with her.

“She sat down beside Jodi and cradled her in her arms.

I guess the family are suspicious of me because my dog Mia was the one who found Jodi and I was the one who first saw her lying there”

I interviewed Mitchell months before he had been charged with the murder of Jodi, and days after he had been questioned by detectives hunting for her killer.

Aged 15 at the time, the Luke Mitchell in front of me was an adult in everything but name.

Chain smoking and dressed in baggy jeans and a dark-coloured T-shirt, he exuded confidence bordering on arrogance.

Yet all the time his eyes flicked towards his mother Corinne, as if seeking reassurance from the woman with whom he obviously had an extra-special bond.

Mitchell and his mother were like a well-rehearsed double act.

As Corinne Mitchell ranted about the unfair treatment of her son, Mitchell would pace the floor as he vented his anger at the way the police had dealt with him.

Then his mother would touch him lightly on the arm and he would, as if by magic, calm down.

And as he gave his version of his whereabouts the night Jodi was brutally murdered, he constantly looked to her for reassurance, particularly when recalling the time he left the house to meet his girlfriend and the time he went on to meet his friends.

In the first moments of meeting Mitchell I was struck by how confident he was.

After a day at school he knew he was about to meet a journalist, but he walked into the room with a nonchalant air.

As I shook his hand, he gave me a cursory glance before sitting in a chair diagonally across from his mother.

It was clear he was a very sexually aware young man. I immediately felt uncomfortable as his eyes slowly looked me up and down. Mitchell may be a child but his sexuality, arrogance and misplaced maturity make him appear far older than his tender years.

There were a few flashes of childlike behaviour. But they only came as he was distracted by Mia – the dog he claimed picked up Jodi’s scent and led him to her body.

As his story unfolded, it was clear he was a master of manipulation. His story was just too word-perfect. It was also, as has now transpired, a tissue of lies.

This was a 15-year-old who never buckled once during interviews with some of Scotland’s most experienced policemen. The more police pushed him, the more arrogant he became.

He boasted to me: ‘After a few hours I told them, “charge me or let me go”.’

Mitchell leaned forward in his chair and stared intently at me as he told me how police had made his life ‘a misery’ and how they tried to relate to him through stories of rap star Eminem, shock rocker Marilyn Manson and pop singer Holly Valance.

He said: ‘The cops asked me about my relationship with Jodi’s friend Laura.

They kept asking me about the Eminem song Kim, the song where he fantasises about killing his wife.

“They asked me about the follow- up song in which Eminem sings about the “two of us”, meaning him and his daughter. They asked me about Laura and if I wanted it to be just the two of us and asked if that was why I killed Jodi”

“It was all rubbish. Jodi and I would still be together if she was here today”

Detectives were astonished by how arrogant Mitchell was during interviews. Even when confronted with evidence he remained defiant.

He seemed to realise police were trying to relate to him as a teenager and find some kind of common ground.

However, as Mitchell saw himself as an adult, he found the tactic amusing and gained a sense of confidence as the interrogation went on.

Mitchell took to pacing the floor again as he told me how he had ‘got really mad’ with police.

Clenching his fists he said: ‘I started to get really mad after about four hours and asked them to charge me if they had anything to charge me with.’ It was clear Mitchell enjoyed playing cat and mouse with detectives. He said: ‘ One copper stood, looked me straight in my face and said, “We’ve got you. We found your semen on her bra.

We’ve found sperm similar to yours.” I laughed and said, “If it’s similar, it’s not the same then, is it?” ‘ He told how detectives showed him a video reconstruction of how it would have been impossible for him to see Jodi’s body in the dark woods with only a torch – implying he must have known exactly where she was lying.

He said: ‘Jodi’s body was replaced with a tailor’s dummy and I pointed out to police that I could see a limb. That’ s when they switched the video off.’

But then, chillingly, he revealed that he, Jodi and their friend Laura had been talking about funeral arrangements a few nights before the murder.

He said: ‘What happened to Jodi was so ironic because the Thursday before she died we were all talking about what records we would want played at our funeral.’ I could picture him that night, talking in the bedroom with Jodi – taking a perverse pleasure in knowing the fate that awaited her.

He said police took a lock knife from him after being tipped off by friends.

But he added:

‘The bloke who said this is a fantasist. Another of his friends told police Jodi and I were arguing all the time. But that’s not true. We never had a cross word”

Mitchell also denied he was taunting police when he left a note with flowers for Jodi which quoted from Kurt Cobain’s journals:

“The finest day I ever had was when tomorrow never came”

He said: “The only reason I left it was because she loved that line. I wanted to be with Jodi and nobody else”

It was the first time in our interview that Mitchell spoke of any affection for Jodi.

But then, to change the subject, he spent ten minutes talking about newly learned computer skills – just like any other teenage boy – before asking his mother for the keys to her 4×4 Land Rover.

Then, nonchalantly, he walked outside, started up the engine and drove at high speeds around nearby waste ground.

It seemed, yet again, that Mitchell was playing at being an adult.

When he returned, he told his mother he was going to see his friend Laura and, since it was on my way, I offered to give Mitchell a lift.

In the car, he said very little about Jodi, continuing to talk about his computer course. When the car came to a standstill, he leaned over and gave me a hug before jumping out.

Just four weeks later, he was arrested for Jodi’s murder.

I truly believe Mitchell thought he could get away with it.

As we parted, he couldn’t resist having the final word.

A last gesture, and his last chance to goad the police:

“I was never going to break down in public – I’m not that kind of bloke”

“They made a mistake and thought I was just a normal teenager”

By Grace McLean for the Daily Mail article headed I’m simply not a normal teenager EXCLUSIVE: Luke Mitchell’s chilling boast to the Mail dated 22nd January 2005

Driving His Mother Corinne Mitchell’s 4×4 Land Rover & Had A Job

Not only had killer Luke Mitchell driven before he was sent to prison he also “had a job”.

He worked for his mother Corinne Mitchell and grandmother Ruby Guetta at Scott’s caravans in Mayfield.

Scammer Sandra Lean has previously acknowledge this fact, including in 2015 here, where she stated about the killer;

Helping out with the family business

Sandra Lean – 17th October 2015 (Source here)

Thirteen years earlier Sandra Lean had stated on the WAP Website she ran with un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton;

He worked part time for his mothers business

Source here (See second paragraph under “behaviour & knives”)

“Isn’t it amazing how quickly we forget” indeed!

Roberta Glass’ Video’s On Scammer Sandra Lean Worth Watching

Link to Part 267 here

Killer Luke Mitchell: Scammer Sandra Lean & The DNA On The Murderers Trousers Hidden In A Bag (Also Referred To As A Hold-All) “From The Previous Weekend” (Part 260)

The Lies Around The Murderers Hold-All

In Part 253 of this ongoing blog series (which can be read by tapping on the button below) it was evidenced how scammer Scott Forbes had confirmed via his Twitter social media account that killer Luke Mitchell had NOT stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house “for weeks” before he committed his murder;

Fake “Lawyer” Scott Forbes Confirms Murderer Had NOT Stayed At Father Philip Mitchell’s House “For Weeks” (Part 253)

On the 6th of October 2015 scammer Sandra Lean stated;

The DNA on Luke’s trousers was actually on a pair of trousers which had been in a bag in his room for several days

Source here

On the 7th March 2021 Sandra Lean again referred to killer Luke Mitchell’s trousers with Jodi Jones🌻 DNA found on them.

The police found the trousers hidden in a hold-all in killer Luke Mitchell’s home on the 4th July 2003.

Scammer Sandra Lean stated ;

They were still in the hold-all from the previous week-end

Statement by Sandra Lean made on 7th March 2021 (from around 8:58 of her video)

In October 2018 Sandra Lean stated;

The DNA to which this expert referred was, in fact, on another pair of trousers taken from Luke’s home – there was no way of telling how long the DNA trace from Jodi had been there

Sandra Lean – from p.196 of her second Innocence fraud book

killer Luke Mitchell had not stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house “for weeks”.

There was no evidence produced to show killer Luke Mitchell had stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house “the previous week–end”.

This was and is another bare faced lie!

Link to Part 261 here