Note: Sunflowers were Jodi Jones🌻 favourite flower and during her daughters funeral, Judith Jones, Jodi’s🌻 mother wore a sunflower emblem. Fourteen sunflowers were also laid in tribute by Judith after her daughter’s death – “one for every year of sunshine you gave”. Innocence Fraud Watch did not include a screenshot of Sandra Lean’s second innocence fraud book with the distasteful photo of a whilted and dying sunflower on the front, as this appeared to have been yet another attack on Jodi Jones memory and her loved ones.
On the 19th of May 2023 criminal profiler Pat Brown published a video on YouTube where she gave the impression she would “analyse” charlatan and fraudster Sandra Lean’s second innocence fraud book.
Innocence Fraud Watch blogged briefly on the appeals to credentials fallacy in Part 4 of this blog series, which can be read by tapping on the button below;
Prior to her second innocence fraud book, scammer Sandra Lean had written her first book, which was published in 2007 by Diggory press Ltd.
Sandra Lean and fraudster and convicted criminal Stephen T Manning (STM) were allegedly taking legal action against Diggory press Ltd.
Below is a copy of a forum post made in 2008 on the WritersNet forum by Sandra Lean where she stated “..we are indeed taking Diggory to court”;
In 2008 Stephen T Manning, under the name Checkpoint press, Ireland published Sandra Lean’s 1st book for the second time;
My first book, “No Smoke, the Shocking Truth about British Justice,” was published by Checkpoint Press, Ireland in 2008.
Sandra Lean here
There is a “testimonial” by Sandra Lean on Stephen T Manning’s website here, where she claimed to be “Dr” Sandra Lean;
In 2008 however, when No Smoke was published for the second time, Sandra Lean did not have her bogus PhD.
Stephen T Manning also claimed to have a PhD, and referred to himself as Dr Stephen T Manning.
Excerpts from one of Wondereraround’s blogs headed Dr Manning, Ph.D. An Academic Fraud read as follows;
STM is obviously aware that calling himself a Doctor and putting a Ph.D. after his name gives him an air of credibility and intelligence, earning himself respect he wouldn’t otherwise get. It makes it seem he knows what he’s talking about. And it makes people trust him more. But STM is a fake and doesn’t deserve either the public’s trust or respect.
STM is not a real doctor. STM doesn’t have a doctorate from an accredited academic institution. He bought his combined masters degree and doctorate from a notorious American diploma mill in Hawaii
Wondereraround here
Wondereraround wrote and published several blogs on Stephen T Manning (STM) and his fraudulent claims against Diggory press.
One of Wonderaround’s blogs, headed Proof of Stephen T Manning’s fraudulent court claims against Diggory Press and Rosalind Miriam Franklin. Illegally Using Someone Else’s Name can be read here
Another of Wondereraround’s blogs headed Stephen T Manning’s and his Checkpoint Press’s Theft On Diggory Press Book Cover can be read here.
Sandra Lean’s Web Of Deceit & Preposterous Claims
Below are excerpts from Sandra Lean’s second innocence fraud book Innocents Betrayed, published by her via Amazon in October 2018;
The piles and piles of documents I amassed in my search for answers somehow turned themselves into a book; No Smoke, the Shocking Truth about British Justice, which highlighted seven cases of convic- tions where the evidence either clearly pointed to someone else or was so flimsy that it would not have passed a “slight doubt” test, far less a “beyond reasonable doubt” standard.
Even laying aside questions of guilt or innocence (as they are understood in layman’s terms) in these cases, it would have been clear to a five-year-old child that these convictions were not safe, in the legal context. They had not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, because simply reading through the material raised so many doubts.
Excerpts from Sandra Lean’s 2nd innocence fraud book IB (from pages 19 & 23 respectively)
Sandra Lean never had “piles and piles of documents” on killer Simon Hall’s case, and it’s doubtful she ever did in any of the other 6 cases she wrote innocence fraud narratives for in her first fraudulent book.
Killer Simon Hall’s actual, factual guilt to his murder and his and his deceptive enablers innocence fraud scam were exposed in 2012/13.
This was 5-6 years before Sandra Lean (self published) her second fraudulent book.
The evidence never, ever “pointed to someone else” having been responsible for dangerous killer Simon Hall’s murder.
And the evidence against him was most certainly NOT “flimsy” as Sandra Lean claimed.
There was, and is no evidence anywhere to suggest killer Simon Hall’s conviction was “unsafe”, and most certainly not in October 2018 when charlatan Sandra Lean made the preposterous claims in her 2nd book.
Reading through all “the material” pointed to killer Simon Hall and only Simon Hall!
Why did Pat Brown not consider any of these facts when carrying out her analysis on Sandra Lean’s second Innocence fraud book?
Pat Brown & Her Double Binds
Pat Brown stated of the 2nd book;
I do not think the book is well written, there are no footnotes
I don’t know where this information comes from
Pat Brown 19th May 2023
Pat Brown also stated;
Mind you, right here we are pretty well aware this is not a balanced book
Sandra Lean is working with the defence, for the defence and this is the defence
Pat Brown – 19th May 2023
Sadistic killer Luke Mitchell does NOT have a defence team!
Sandra Lean is NOT a defence lawyer!
Pat Brown also reads from Sandra Lean’s book stating:
“If the pursuit of true justice is sacrificed to the pursuit of true justice alone, where does that leave those that are convicted as a result and the families and the victims and their families and us as ordinary members of the public”
Then Pat Brown bizarrely stated;
She’s correct in that
You want, you want justice to be pursued objectively and not something just, you want a notch in your belt, you wanna close your case down
I agree with her on that
Pat Brown – 19th May 2019
Justice was “pursued objectively” in all the cases Sandra Lean has written about!
And if Pat Brown viewed Sandra Lean words and her behaviours objectively and stopped projecting, she may see what many of us see.
Sandra Lean is a charlatan and fraud who promotes the “very real” innocence fraud phenomenon!
Maybe Pat Brown will do another video on the nonsense written by Sandra Lean, contained within her fraudulent PhD thesis here.
Innocence Fraud Watch blogged on some of Sandra Lean’s fraudulent PhD thesis;
Pat Brown also stated;
The next issue that Sandra Lean goes into, and she puts it right here called “how the stories changed”
Basically she attacks the family of Jodi
Pat Brown – May 2023
Which is indeed what Sandra Lean has been doing for 20 years!
Pat Brown made the following statement in the comments section of her video on Jodi Jones🌻;
They had parents but neither Jodi or Luke had their dad in the home. But, if Jodi hadn’t been murdered, perhaps, she would have matured. Or she might even have gotten pregnant and been a teen mom! As to Luke, well, he seemed to have major issues, ignoring the murder thing.
Pat Brown – May 2023
There is no evidence anywhere to suggest Jodi Jones🌻may have become a “teen mum”.
Evidence suggests Jodi Jones🌻 had had sexual intercourse less that half a dozen times before she was murdered.
Jodi Jones was described as being “very level headed” and also “very strong minded“.
Also, neither of Jodi Jones🌻 siblings became parents in their teens.
There was however a wealth of evidence to suggest sadistic killer and sexually aggressive deviant Luke Mitchell could have become a teen father.
The evidence suggests he may have been having sexual intercourse with several young girls around the same time period leading up to when he committed his murder.
In another of her videos titled Patron Hangout #89 #BrianKohberger #JoranvanderSloot Pat Brown stated at around 17:15, referring to killers and/or Brian Kohberger;
So what they do, is they can’t win now, but as time goes on, he gets convicted and then he’s sitting in prison and he starts getting the love letters, which he is already by the way
He’s getting love letters from women, who think he’s innocent and of course they want to be his wife and his girlfriend, and you know this incel dude (laugh) is finally getting dates.
Pat Brown (two days ago) from her video headed Patron Hangout #89 #BrianKohberger #JoranvanderSloot from approx 17:15
Women finally like him because he’s got enough screwed up narcissistic females who are perfectly happy to hook up with a killer, an alleged killer, eh to get their own narcissistic feed.
Maybe Pat Brown can explain the difference between the ”screwed up females” she mentions in her video (referred to above) and their alleged “narcissistic feed”, with the narcissistic feed of someone like charlatan and fraudster Sandra Lean?
INNOCENCE FRAUD WATCH 