On the 28th of November 2023 Aidan #Turtleboy Kearney published a blog under the partial header Canton Cover-Up Part 227.
The following is an excerpt, and yet more bare faced lies, from #Turtleboy and his blog;
When Read saw O’Keefe’s body she instinctively jumped out of the backseat, leaving her cell phone in the car, which was in the middle of calling O’Keefe’s phone.
Karen Read’s Cell Phone Was OUTSIDE
Karen Read did NOT leave her cell phone in Kerry Roberts’ car and it was NOT “in the middle of calling” John O’Keefe’s cell phone!
When Karen Read got out of Kerry Roberts car, and before Karen ran over to John O’Keefe’s body, she placed her cell phone on the ground, near to the back left hand wheel of Kerry’s car, knowing John’s voicemail had already begun recording her orchestrated performance.
Aidan Kearney also went on to publish the following intentional bare faced lies;
Eventually it reached John’s voicemail and left a 4 minute, 5 second audio message that picked up McCabe’s 911 call from inside the vehicle, and Read’s screams from outside.
Jennifer McCabe was outside when she made the 6:03:47am911 call (which lasted 3 minutes and 32 seconds) and Karen Read’s cell phone recorded Karen scream “Kerry, Kerry”, while it was on the ground outside, a few feet away.
Again, Karen Read got out of Kerry Roberts car and placed her cell phone on the ground (where she would go back and pick it up a few minutes later) before she ran over to John O’Keefe, screaming Kerry Roberts’ name.
The reason parts of Jennifer McCabe’s 911 call were picked up on John O’Keefe’s voicemail as clear as they were, was because Jennifer had run back to Kerry Roberts car, looking for the blankets Kerry had told her were in the back.
So when Jennifer McCabe can be heard saying “Where are the blankets, I don’t see blankets Kerry“, she was standing almost directly over Karen Read’s cell phone, which was laying close by on the ground, on the snow.
And the reason the dull thud of the windscreen wipers can be heard reverberating during the voicemail recording, is because Kerry Roberts’ trunk door of her car was lifted wide open, which created a sort of echo chamber.
Karen Read can be seen picking her cell phone up off the ground at around 6:11:25am in the dashcam footage below;
On the 5th April 2024 Aidan Kearney published a blog headed Canton Coverup Part 327: Thousands Of Cameras Would Have Picked Up Karen Read’s Allegedly Shattered Tail Light On Route 138 When She Drove From Canton To Dighton.
The blog rambles on about Karen Read and her enabling father William Read and their alleged drive to Dighton, Massachusetts, a few hours after Karen Read murdered Boston police officer John O’Keefe.
Throughout his blog, Aidan Kearney included screenshots of maps and roads and referred to surveillance cameras on the route Karen Read and her father allegedly drove that day.
Aidan Kearney states in part;
Police regularly solve murders by getting surveillance videos that put suspects in certain places at certain times.
Yet seasoned State Police investigators did not ask a single one of these businesses or homeowners to look at surveillance video that could lead to a slam dunk conviction of a woman who allegedly murdered a Boston Police Officer.
Karen Read had already told Jennifer McCabe about her smashed taillight by around 5:05am, minutes before Karen had driven out of 1 Meadows avenue.
Plus Karen Read’s SUV had already been caught on camera by 8:23am on the day she committed her murder, via the dashcam footage of the patrol vehicle used by lieutenant Charles Rae and his colleague, when they arrived to carry out a welfare check.
But who drove Karen Read’s SUV back to Dighton, her brother Nathan or father William Read?
As well as prosecuting embezzler Seema Misra, another of Warwick Tatford’s cases was that of Clive Haverleywho stole £17,000.
Excerpts from an article by Jasper Pearce for The Boar read;
A Post Office clerk working at the University’s Post Office who stole £17,000 from the Royal Mail has been spared jail, after pleading guilty in Coventry Crown Court.
Clive Haverley, 57, had been cooking the books from March 2007 in the Costcutter Post Office while working behind the counter. He was sentenced to 36 weeks in prison, suspended for a year, on the condition that he completes 150 hours of unpaid work.
Haverley had been employed on Warwick campus since 1991, and was responsible for maintaining the branch’s accounts on a computer system, which “depends on the honesty of the person responsible for using it,” the prosecution revealed in court last week.
A Post Office Ltd spokesman said: “All staff who work in post offices are in a unique position of trust, and it is always disappointing when that trust is breached. The overwhelming majority of people who work in our branch network are professional, honest and provide the highest standards of service.”
Richard Davenport, the defence lawyer who works with Equity Chambers, attempted to explain Haverley’s actions: “Mr Haverley suffers from prostate cancer, he’s lost his job and he’s lost his respect in the local community. He feels deeply ashamed for what he’s done and he will repay every penny he’s stolen and even more than he took in the first place.”
Haverley has already agreed to repay the money he owes to the Royal Mail, secured against the value of his property. No statement was available from Haverley by way of further explanation, but it has been reported that he is in considerable debt.
He was interviewed about the losses on two occasions before coming clean.
Five other staff from the branch were suspended upon the discovery of Mr Haverley’s crime, but were not considered suspects. A new postmaster has since started work there.
The prosecuting attorney, Warwick Tatford, has a long history of prosecuting fraud cases on behalf of the Post Office, which has recently been the victim of a number of fraudsters.
In March, Sabjit Benning was convicted of embezzling over £194,000 from a Post Office in Northern Ireland, and last year two consecutive postmasters were convicted of taking a total of £225,000 from Sway Post Office in the New Forest.
Sub-postmaster Ian Kirk stole £55,180 between November 2003 and July 2006.
Ian Kirk ran the Sway post office inside a Newsagent shop in the New Forrest, he “told police he had been burgled while he was in the toilet”.
Excerpts from a Daily Echo article by Fiona Pendlebury read;
Prosecutor Warwick Tatford said that the Post Office had been alerted by the branch keeping too much money on the premises overnight.
Numerous requests were made to return several thousand pounds but Kirk did not comply, the court heard.
On June 30 last year investigators went to find out what was going on and “that’s when the cat slipped out of the bag”, said Mr Tatford.
However, when investigators arrived, Kirk initially “fobbed them off”, he said.
After 30 minutes waiting for the time delay to unlock the safe, Kirk said it had not been set properly and they had to wait another 45 minutes.
When the investigators said they would wait, Kirk told them that some weeks previously he had been the victim of a theft.
When interviewed, Kirk said he had been putting £60,000 into pouches on June 16 last year in order to return it.
After finding it gone when he came back from the toilet, he panicked.
Giving evidence to the court, Kirk said he had received “overwhelming” support and letters from well wishers.
The court also heard that Kirk had asked for the trial to be adjourned in September so he could produce bank documents that would have “destroyed the prosecution case” but had been unable to produce them.
Janet Ryan received an award in 2007 similar to what Seema Misra had done previously.
Excerpts from a KentOnline article read;
Janet Ryan
A village sub-postmistress who stole more than £15,000 to shore up the ailing shop side of the business has been spared a jail sentence.
Janet Ryan was told by a judge he considered the community would not be best served by sending her to prison.
Maidstone Crown Court heard the 49-year-old “borrowed” £15,517 from Appledore post office in The Street over a nine-month period.
Ryan and her husband took over the post office and shop in June 2006 when it was said to be “somewhat rundown”.
Frank Winslett, defending, said the couple worked hard and to some extent it paid off.
In 2007, it won an award for best village shop in the south.
But in June last year an audit revealed a “hole” in accounts. Ryan made full and frank admissions she had taken the money.
Warwick Tatford, prosecuting, said it had become apparent a large amount of cheques produced at the post office never arrived at the central office.
When interviewed, Ryan said she borrowed the money because there were problems with the shop.
“She was frank enough to admit full dishonesty,” said Mr Tatford. “She had hidden money stolen by inventing transactions, saying the money had been spent.
“Theft of about £1,400 had been hidden by inflation of the amount of Euros there. A large hole was found in the accounts.
“Part of the hole involved genuine mistakes, some £3,000. She has paid the money back.”
Mr Winslett said it was apparent Ryan, who admitted theft and nine fraud offences, would be found out when there was an audit.
Father of one Warnes received a nine-month suspended sentence, allowing him to continue working at his shop and pay off the loans
When sub postmaster Graham Warnes was caught stealing £28,000 from Royal Mail, his reputation as a popular and respected local figure faced ruin.
But rather than treat him as a pariah, the community banded together to support him in an extraordinary show of generosity.
They lent him enough to pay off the debt after learning he only took the money to prop up his village shop when it fell into financial trouble.
Now their charity has snowballed, with a judge sparing the 55-year-old jail when she heard how the people of Fowlmere, near Royston in Hertfordshire, still held him in high regard.
Warnes, who was given a nine-month suspended sentence, will now be able to go back to working at the shop and sub post office he ran for more than 20 years and pay off the loans.
Yesterday he said: ‘All I can say is a big thank you to the villagers for their support and I’ll do all I can to put things right.
‘It’s not until something like this happens that you realise just how fantastic some people can be and who your friends are.’
The shop ran into trouble in 2006, Luton Crown Court heard.
Last year Royal Mail noticed computer records showing an ‘alarming amount’ of cash being held at the sub post office and an unusually large number of stamp transactions.
When an audit in August revealed the cash did not exist, Warnes admitted immediately: ‘The shortage is 100 per cent down to me.’
He had taken £28,597 over two years to prop up the shop, exaggerating the money held in cash at the sub post office so the books balanced.
Kevin McCartney, defending, described his client as someone ‘who was normally scrupulously honest and held in high regard’.
He told the court: ‘This is a case where one sees someone who has made a mess of things. It started out with good intentions to try and keep a business going, a business that is the central hub of the village.’
Once villagers discovered what had happened, he added, they showed ‘touching support’.
He mentioned one anonymous donor who sent Warnes £50 and ‘wished him well’.
Mr McCartney added: ‘The community at large would want him to repay their loans and to maintain the village shop.
‘Their view is that while recognising fully what he did was wrong, they would prefer he is given the opportunity to right that wrong.’
During the video killer Sean Toal and Scott Forbes told many outrageous lies.
The following is some dialogue between the pair of innocence fraudsters;
So the police are now driving people about
They’ve been over the wall of a crime scene
Come on anybody with any..
Scott Forbes
Is this the local police then
Sean Toal
Aye started off with the local police and then Dobbie and that arrived
He was a detective superintendent for Edinburgh
Scott Forbes
But this time the place have already let..
Sean Toal
Aye they’ve allowed people to go home covered in Jodi’s blood
Scott Forbes
And what was Dobbie’s answer to that
Sean Toal
Ah he just says ach we’ve carri.. our investigation was the finest police work that we’ve ever carried out
Scott Forbes
So there’s people there that have been involved in finding the body
They’re covered in blood
They don’t get questioned
They get drove about Dalkeith and then they pick on Luke
Sean Toal
Detective chief superintendent Craig Dobbie was not appointed as senior investigating officer until gone 03:00hrs, by which time all the family members had left the scene.
And no one was “covered in blood” like killer Sean Toal stated!
This is another intentional bare faced lie!
Alice Walker was the only person to have gone near her grand-daughter Jodi Jones’ body and Alice had said she might have touched her grand-daughters forehead.
The intentional bare faced lie about Alice Walker “cradling” her grand-daughter body was started by sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell!
Janine Jones, Steven Kelly and Alice Walker were driven directly to Newbattle police station, they were not “droveabout” Dalkeith like killer Sean Toal stated and they didn’t go home until after they had been at the police station – where they were asked questions.
Pages 806 and 807 of Janine Jones’ trial testimony describes some of what happened in the early hours of the morning of 1st July 2003;
Tap on the button below to read more, directly from trial transcripts;
Scammer Sandra Lean and her former boyfriend, un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton were involved in killer Sean Toal’s public relations innocence fraud spin campaign:
In reality – killers Sean Toal and Luke Mitchell had been cohorts since at least 2010.
Sandra Lean has remained (publicly) silent since her bare faced lies, disinformation and misinformation are being exposed by trial transcripts but she recently commented on murderer Sean Toal on Facebook;
Nicola Brennan, who was referred to in Part 296here commented on Sandra’s post;
Whilst over on X Heather Brunt, who was referred to in Part 288here also tweeted on killer Sean Toal – commenting on how fraudster Scott Forbes “worked on his case”;
Tap on the button below to read more about fraudster Scott Forbes;
Killer Sean Toal also refers to himself as Social Sessions on various social media platforms, as well as @seanaldo1985 on X.
Social Sessions tweeted Neil MacKay on the 4th December 2023;
Neil MacKay was involved in the fraudulent 2021 channel 5 TV show Murder In A Small Town. Neil MacKay was referred to in Parts 261 and 265 of this ongoing blog series, both of which can be read by tapping on the buttons below;
On the 7th December 2023 killer Sean Toal asked John Halley to message him.
John Halley was arrested in March 2023 for sex offences (Read more here) and had also been promoting scammer Sandra Lean’s nonsense on social media, although he too has recently gone quiet on this.
Again – since trial transcripts have been published, Sandra Lean has remained silent
Tap on the button below for links to trial transcripts;
Misleading evidence was presented to the three judges presiding over the appeal hearing of violent rapist and convicted fraudster Andrew Malkinson.
Saturday 19th July 2003: Was the date of Andrew Malkinson’s Violent Attack & Rapes
Sunday 20th July 2003: Was the date Edward Henry claimed to the appeal judges police constables (Pc’s) Chris Baybutt & Gary Waite visited Andrew Malkinson at work
Your lordships the very next morning, purely as a result of a hunch, when the description of the attacker had been recited to them, the night before at the scene, police constable Waite and police constable Baybutt, on hearing the description of the attacker said ‘that’s Andrew Malkinson’ because about a month before they had stopped him erm, he hadn’t committed any offence, but he was seen riding pillion on the back of a young Mr Hardman’s moped
And they had stopped him, so as a result of the hunch they went to see him the following day
Immediately the day after the attack at his place of work
Statements by Edward Henry during Andrew Malkinson’s appeal hearing on 26th July 2023 here
Monday 21st July 2003: Said to be the date the VICTIM in this case gave her police witness statement
Monday 21st July 2003: Was the date Andrew Malkinson stated in 2016 (via writer Bob Woffinden) that Pc’s Baybutt & Waite visited him at work
The evidence was that at 2.00pm on the day of the attack two community beat officers, after hearing the description of the attacker, had ‘immediately’ and ‘simultaneously’ named Malkinson as the suspect.
Why would anyone, having heard of the attacker’s ‘smart’ clothes, instantly think of the generally dishevelled Malkinson?
Secondly, two days later, on Monday 21 July, the officers saw Malkinson at work.
Excerpts by Bob Woffinden’s taken from chapter 5 of his book The Nicholas cases
Friday 25th July 2003: The date the CCRC submitted to the appeal court judges that Pc’s Baybutt & Waite visited Andrew Malkinson at work
My learned friend and the respondent says that the commission has over stated this matter
In fact actually if we go to the statement of reason, eh and if I may ask you, and if I do erm ask you very briefly my lords to go to page 114, eh and eh paragraph 165
Forgive me 164, this is what the commission said
‘This is significant because the trial judge raised the question of whether the victim was mistaken about having scratched her attacker at all and told the jury that if she may have scratched her attacker then the person responsible for the attack cannot be the defendant
Dr Anderson’s mistake allowed the judge to suggest that the victim may have been mistaken in her account of scratching her attacker. This undermined an important defence point made by Mr Malkinson’s counsel at trial that the fact that Mr Malkinson was not injured or disfigured in anyway when he was seen by the police on the 25th of July, six days after the attack, meant that he could not have been the attacker’
With the greatest respect to my learned friend but also to the commission, erm the commission erm got that wrong
It was the very next day
Statements by Edward Henry during Andrew Malkinson’s appeal on 26th July 2023 at around 1:14:44 here
Who Was & Is Wrong?
It is not clear who was and is wrong in relation to the date Pc’s Chris Baybutt and Gary Waite visited Ellesmere shopping centre.
However it was reported that both Pc’s Baybutt and Waite were “recommended for a commendation” by Judge Michael Henshall, who presided over the February 2004 trial, for helping to bring violent rapist Andrew Malkinson to justice.
Liar and scammer Sandra Lean stated on the 23rd July 2023 on actual, factual guilty murderer Luke Mitchell;
..a 35 year oldman
Who has never driven a car
Let me see I’ve got a list of what he’s never done
He’s never driven a car
Had a legal drink
Had a job
Shopped for his own needs
“Shopped For His Own Needs”
Chris Taylor and Harry Williamson’s 17thJune2023 article for the Scottish Sun here headed;
evidenced killer Luke Mitchell shopping “for his own needs” and contained many quotes of statements made by the killer including the following;
I visited a few shops — bought some toiletries, bought some games, bought some food
Sadistic killer Luke Mitchell
Had An Illegal Drink
Killer Luke Mitchell may not have had a “legal drink” but he most definitely drunk illegally before he was sent to prison.
There are photographs online of killer Luke Mitchell’s bedroom with bottles of alcohol clearly visible on the top shelf of his pine unit, as can be seen in the copy of the photograph below next to Beavis and Butt-Head;
Sandra Lean also stated;
Isn’t it amazing how quickly we forget
Sandra Lean – 23rd July 2023
A Few Days After Killer Luke Mitchell’s 2003 Police Interview
Sandra Lean might want to remind herself of Grace McLean’s 22nd January 2005 Daily Mail article headed “I’msimplynotanormalteenager: EXCLUSIVE: Luke Mitchell’s chilling boast to the Mail“.
Journalist Grace McLean first met with killer Luke Mitchell and his mother Corinne Mitchell a few days after his section 14 interview which took place on the 14th of August 2003.
Grace McLean stated;
Iinterviewed Mitchell months before he had been charged with the murder of Jodi, and days after he had been questioned by detectives hunting for her killer
Grace McLean
Grace McLean also met with killer Luke Mitchell “four weeks” before he was arrested in April 2004.
It appears killer Luke Mitchell orchestrated their meeting.
What is clear is that around this time the killer and his mother were courting the media, as is also evidenced by the Sky TV interview on the day of Jodi Jones funeral with James Matthews.
A copy of Grace McLean’s article has been reproduced below;
THE words coming out of his mouth were enough to chill the heart.
His voice flat and emotionless, Luke Mitchell was describing to me the moment he discovered the body of his girlfriend, mutilated and abandoned on the muddy earth.
For the schoolgirl who died an unspeakable death, horrifically mutilated, there was no expression of love from Luke Mitchell – and no tears.
This was Luke’s story in his own words – the account the jury never heard as the teenager never gave evidence during his trial.
“My torch lit up the path like daytime and I was about 12 yards from Jodi when I saw her lying there” he began.
“She was so white. Her throat had been slit and her head was to the side.
“Her eyes were staring up at me and she was naked but for a pair of socks, I think… no, she wasn’t wearing anything. Her body was so white and she was just staring and staring.
‘”I shouted to the others but I couldn’t tell them I’d found Jodi because I didn’t want to upset her gran, but she said she wanted to come over the wall.
‘The others held her back but she scrambled over the wall and said if her granddaugher was there she wanted to be with her.
“She sat down beside Jodi and cradled her in her arms.
I guess the family are suspicious of me because my dog Mia was the one who found Jodi and I was the one who first saw her lying there”
I interviewed Mitchell months before he had been charged with the murder of Jodi, and days after he had been questioned by detectives hunting for her killer.
Aged 15 at the time, the Luke Mitchell in front of me was an adult in everything but name.
Chain smoking and dressed in baggy jeans and a dark-coloured T-shirt, he exuded confidence bordering on arrogance.
Yet all the time his eyes flicked towards his mother Corinne, as if seeking reassurance from the woman with whom he obviously had an extra-special bond.
Mitchell and his mother were like a well-rehearsed double act.
As Corinne Mitchell ranted about the unfair treatment of her son, Mitchell would pace the floor as he vented his anger at the way the police had dealt with him.
Then his mother would touch him lightly on the arm and he would, as if by magic, calm down.
And as he gave his version of his whereabouts the night Jodi was brutally murdered, he constantly looked to her for reassurance, particularly when recalling the time he left the house to meet his girlfriend and the time he went on to meet his friends.
In the first moments of meeting Mitchell I was struck by how confident he was.
After a day at school he knew he was about to meet a journalist, but he walked into the room with a nonchalant air.
As I shook his hand, he gave me a cursory glance before sitting in a chair diagonally across from his mother.
It was clear he was a very sexually aware young man. I immediately felt uncomfortable as his eyes slowly looked me up and down. Mitchell may be a child but his sexuality, arrogance and misplaced maturity make him appear far older than his tender years.
There were a few flashes of childlike behaviour. But they only came as he was distracted by Mia – the dog he claimed picked up Jodi’s scent and led him to her body.
As his story unfolded, it was clear he was a master of manipulation. His story was just too word-perfect. It was also, as has now transpired, a tissue of lies.
This was a 15-year-old who never buckled once during interviews with some of Scotland’s most experienced policemen. The more police pushed him, the more arrogant he became.
He boasted to me: ‘After a few hours I told them, “charge me or let me go”.’
Mitchell leaned forward in his chair and stared intently at me as he told me how police had made his life ‘a misery’ and how they tried to relate to him through stories of rap star Eminem, shock rocker Marilyn Manson and pop singer Holly Valance.
He said: ‘The cops asked me about my relationship with Jodi’s friend Laura.
They kept asking me about the Eminem song Kim, the song where he fantasises about killing his wife.
“They asked me about the follow- up song in which Eminem sings about the “two of us”, meaning him and his daughter. They asked me about Laura and if I wanted it to be just the two of us and asked if that was why I killed Jodi”
“It was all rubbish. Jodi and I would still be together if she was here today”
Detectives were astonished by how arrogant Mitchell was during interviews. Even when confronted with evidence he remained defiant.
He seemed to realise police were trying to relate to him as a teenager and find some kind of common ground.
However, as Mitchell saw himself as an adult, he found the tactic amusing and gained a sense of confidence as the interrogation went on.
Mitchell took to pacing the floor again as he told me how he had ‘got really mad’ with police.
Clenching his fists he said: ‘I started to get really mad after about four hours and asked them to charge me if they had anything to charge me with.’ It was clear Mitchell enjoyed playing cat and mouse with detectives. He said: ‘ One copper stood, looked me straight in my face and said, “We’ve got you. We found your semen on her bra.
We’ve found sperm similar to yours.” I laughed and said, “If it’s similar, it’s not the same then, is it?” ‘ He told how detectives showed him a video reconstruction of how it would have been impossible for him to see Jodi’s body in the dark woods with only a torch – implying he must have known exactly where she was lying.
He said: ‘Jodi’s body was replaced with a tailor’s dummy and I pointed out to police that I could see a limb. That’ s when they switched the video off.’
But then, chillingly, he revealed that he, Jodi and their friend Laura had been talking about funeral arrangements a few nights before the murder.
He said: ‘What happened to Jodi was so ironic because the Thursday before she died we were all talking about what records we would want played at our funeral.’ I could picture him that night, talking in the bedroom with Jodi – taking a perverse pleasure in knowing the fate that awaited her.
He said police took a lock knife from him after being tipped off by friends.
But he added:
‘The bloke who said this is a fantasist. Another of his friends told police Jodi and I were arguing all the time. But that’s not true. We never had a cross word”
Mitchell also denied he was taunting police when he left a note with flowers for Jodi which quoted from Kurt Cobain’s journals:
“The finest day I ever had was when tomorrow never came”
He said: “The only reason I left it was because she loved that line. I wanted to be with Jodi and nobody else”
It was the first time in our interview that Mitchell spoke of any affection for Jodi.
But then, to change the subject, he spent ten minutes talking about newly learned computer skills – just like any other teenage boy – before asking his mother for the keys to her 4×4 Land Rover.
Then, nonchalantly, he walked outside, started up the engine and drove at high speeds around nearby waste ground.
It seemed, yet again, that Mitchell was playing at being an adult.
When he returned, he told his mother he was going to see his friend Laura and, since it was on my way, I offered to give Mitchell a lift.
In the car, he said very little about Jodi, continuing to talk about his computer course. When the car came to a standstill, he leaned over and gave me a hug before jumping out.
Just four weeks later, he was arrested for Jodi’s murder.
I truly believe Mitchell thought he could get away with it.
As we parted, he couldn’t resist having the final word.
A last gesture, and his last chance to goad the police:
“I was never going to break down in public – I’m not that kind of bloke”
“They made a mistake and thought I was just a normal teenager”
By Grace McLean for the Daily Mail article headed I’msimplynotanormalteenagerEXCLUSIVE: Luke Mitchell’s chilling boast to the Mail dated 22nd January 2005
Driving His Mother Corinne Mitchell’s 4×4 Land Rover & Had A Job
Not only had killer Luke Mitchell driven before he was sent to prison he also “had a job”.
He worked for his mother Corinne Mitchell and grandmother Ruby Guetta at Scott’s caravans in Mayfield.
Scammer Sandra Lean has previously acknowledge this fact, including in 2015 here, where she stated about the killer;
In Part 253 of this ongoing blog series (which can be read by tapping on the button below) it was evidenced how scammer Scott Forbes had confirmed via his Twitter social media account that killer Luke Mitchell had NOT stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house “forweeks” before he committed his murder;
On the 7th March 2021 Sandra Lean again referred to killer Luke Mitchell’s trousers with Jodi Jones🌻 DNA found on them.
The police found the trousers hidden in a hold-all in killer Luke Mitchell’s home on the 4th July 2003.
Scammer Sandra Lean stated ;
They were still in the hold-all from the previous week-end
Statement by Sandra Lean made on 7th March 2021 (from around 8:58 of her video)
In October 2018 Sandra Lean stated;
The DNA to which this expert referred was, in fact, on another pair of trousers taken from Luke’s home – there was no way of telling how long the DNA trace from Jodi had been there
Sandra Lean – from p.196 of her second Innocence fraud book
killer Luke Mitchell had not stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house “for weeks”.
There was no evidence produced to show killer Luke Mitchell had stayed at his father Philip Mitchell’s house “the previous week–end”.
INNOCENCE FRAUD WATCH 