You will never be able to make some people understand or accept something if they are too stubborn or unwilling to learn or notice

It is not known if Sharon Indy Sunshine (Aka Sharon Young) is one of these people who is “too stubborn” but she is definitely one of these people who is “unwilling to learn or notice”.

Unwilling To Learn Or Notice

On the 24th of October 2022 Sharon Young made a statement on the cult-like Facebook group promoting the innocence fraud of sadistic and psychopathic killer Luke Mitchell, in response to a Facebook post made by Emma.

Emma posted the below;

I’m just starting Sandra’s book and I’ve got a few questions.

Has Jodi’s family said anything about this book or what others might consider this as theories?

Putting myself in their shoes I’d be furious there was all of this (groups, books, podcasts,etc), I’d do everything in my power to shut them off and shame them for tormenting my family.

I find it odd, this all goes on and they just sit back.

What’s Luke position now?

If I’m getting my timing right, it must be soon he’s able to be released or up for parole?

I told someone I was reading the book and how I really don’t think Luke done it and explained why.

But they said that there was evident of blood on the clothing items his mum burnt that night in the garden.

I remember reading or watching about it, that the fire didn’t happen that night and the parka wasn’t burnt. Can someone clear that up for me please?

I signed the petition last year, did it gain enough signatures to be discussed or did it fall short and that’s why we need to write to MSPs and have a peaceful/silent protest?

Emma

In response to Emma, Sharon Young posted the following;

Hi, please continue to read the book by Dr Sandra Lean it is all based on the provable facts from the case files anyone else only has an opinion which is just that, an opinion based on things such as the media wrote.

Well, one way it has been received was with a serious death threat to Dr Sandra Lean at her home in front of witnesses by JoJ. Dr Lean writes about that in her book.

Sharon Indy Sunshine Aka Sharon Young – 24th October 2022

Sharon Delusion’s & Bare Faced Lies

Sharon Sunshine’s above statement is a bare faced lie.

Sandra Lean’s book is not based on “provable facts”!

Sandra Lean’s book is based on killer Luke Mitchell’s defence evidence, which was proven in 2005 in be a lie!

Emma’s question was ‘Has Jodi’s family said anything about this book’.

Why does Emma assume Jodi Jones family would have read renowned liar and fraudster Sandra Lean’s book?

Sandra Lean’s 2nd book (“this book”) was published in October 2018.

Referring to “this book” Sharon stated “Well, one way it has been received was with a serious death threat to Dr Sandra Lean”.

The visit by the brother of Jodi Jones to ask Sandra Lean to end her corrupt and fraudulent smear campaign occurred in 2010, eight years before Sandra published her second book!

There was no “death threat” as Sharon falsely stated – this was concocted by Sandra Lean in an attempt to smear the brother of Jodi Jones.

Sharon’s serious and false allegation (published as a fact) regarding the brother has never been proven to be true.

Sharon’s apparent lack of reasoning and logic is one of the reasons why someone like charlatan and fraudster Sandra Lean (who is the main protagonist of killer Luke Mitchell’s corrupt and fraudulent public relations spin campaign) would use Sharon as one of her “flying monkeys’’ – to do her bidding.

Sharon may think it’s okay to be making serious, false and unproven allegations like this, but it could be someone like Sharon who could be “sued” and made an example of for repeating Sandra Lean’s unproven nonsense.

The Threat To Sandra Lean Was Billy Middleton

It is not known what story scammer Sandra Lean has chosen to tell about the day Jodi Jones brother asked her to end her corrupt and fraudulent spin campaign.

However Sandra Lean apparently had her then boyfriend, un-convicted baby killer, predator and sexual deviant Billy Middleton living with her and her youngest adult daughter Ellie at the time.

Both scammers Sandra Lean and Billy Middleton were and are renowned for making things up to suit their agenda’s.

Stephen A Bennett and all those people involved in the channel 5 TV Show Murder In A Small Town were possibly not aware of all that had gone on before regarding scammers Billy Middleton and Sandra Lean.

Stephen A Bennett and all those people involved in the channel 5 TV Show, also did not attend the killers trial and hear all the evidence presented.

Many of the websites and forums associated to what went on before, linked to Sandra Lean and/or Billy Middleton, have since been removed from the WWW.

Therefore a lot of statements that were once public, for example by psychology student Colin Bowman, have also been removed from the WWW.

Unless you know the back story, prior to the airing of the TV show, you won’t be familiar with all the facts of this corrupt and fraudulent spin campaign and of the various actors involved.

And it’s highly unlikely Sandra Lean would have written about the incident between her and un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton and her daughter Ellie in her second book.

You can read some background into Billy Middleton and the WAP website by tapping on each of the buttons below;

False Allegations

Sandra Lean alleged back in 2010 that when Joseph Jones knocked on her door to ask her to end her corrupt and fraudulent spin and smear campaign, she stated she had told him she wanted to go through the paperwork regarding “the DNA results” with Joseph.

If Sandra Lean viewed Joseph Jones ans any kind of threat, as alleged, why would she offer to go through “the DNA results” with him?

In 2012 Sandra Lean stated (here);

I have offered to meet with Judy, and I offered to show Joseph the DNA results the day he was at my door

Sandra Lean – 21st August 2012 here

What Sandra Lean, and Corinne Mitchell (and others) were falsely claiming back in 2010 was that Stephen Kelly’s blood and semen “were on Jodi’s T-shirt” and that Stephen’s “description and clothing matched” that of a male seen “following Jodi”.

Of course none of this was true (other than the semen transference which was a red herring) but Sandra Lean wanted to speak to Joseph Jones about what she then wrongly thought she had learnef from the paperwork she had at the time.

Excerpts from a 2010 article which picked up on and published these false allegations read;

But his mum recently posted on an internet forum that evidence points to someone else.

“X’s semen and blood were on Jodi’s T-shirt…his description and clothing matched a witness statement of a male ‘following Jodi’…he was known to the police.

Is it me or is anyone else adding things up here?

“Description of man seen behind Jodi – grey hooded top.

“Several days after the murder X hands his grey hooded top to the police saying it has been washed.

“At 5pm X’s alibi is Janine (Jodi’s sister).

“The police accepted that Janine said, ‘he was with me’ and from him ‘ I was with her’.”

And Sandra Lean, author and researcher on miscarriages of justice, added: “Our Mr X is emerging as more and more suspicious.

“The info that’s coming our way is shocking, especially as the police should have been onto this stuff right from the beginning.”

Excerpts from Deadline news article by Cara Sulieman headed Mitchell’s mum points finger at another man for Jodi killing 20th June 2010

If Sandra Lean really thought Joe Jones was any threat to her, why would she claim to have been inviting him then, or to come back another time to sit and go through “the DNA results” with her?

Did Sandra Lean write in her second book that in 2010 she and Corinne Mitchell were falsely accusing Stephen Kelly?

Did she explain in her second book how she claimed she attempted to tell Joe Jones, that Stephen Kelly was to blame for sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s murder of his sister?

Sandra Lean bare faced lied years later and claimed she had made “one typo” in her first book about Stephen Kelly “following Jodi”.

She also claimed that when Joseph Jones had left, un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton was rigging up recording equipment so that if/when Joseph Jones returned they could secretly record him.

It was not long after this that Sandra Lean’s youngest daughter witnessed her mother being threatened by Billy Middleton, so much so that Ellie apparently kicked Billy and his belongings out of their home.

According to Sandra Lean (when she recounted this incident to a third party not long after) Billy Middleton had got up in Sandra’s face threatening her.

Her exact words were that you couldn’t “fit a cigarette paper between“ her and Billy Middleton.

Apparently some hours after Billy Middleton had been kicked out by her daughter Ellie, he contacted Sandra saying he didn’t know where he was.

According to Sandra Lean, her and her daughter then apparently drove around Edinburgh looking for Billy Middleton and she claimed she found him in a street “covered in blood”.

Sandra Lean also claimed she was concerned what Billy Middleton’s parents and sister would say about the “cuts and bruises” on his face when he returned to their home in the Shetland Isles.

What EXACTLY Was Said During The Trial About The Fires In The Mitchell’s Garden

Sharon also stated in her reply to Emma;

When you get to the section about the log burner you will see that zero forensic evidence of burned fabric was recovered or zips studs and rivets etc which normally people who burn things overlook in the disposal process. The wood burner only had remnants of organic materials in it.

Sharon Indy Sunshine – 24th October 2022

Sharon did not attend killer Luke Mitchell’s trial and has no idea exactly what was said about the fires in the Mitchell’s back garden that night.

Green fibres were found in the log burner.

Corinne Mitchell stated that during the trial she “could have been burning pampas grass”.

What else was said during the trial about the fires in the Mitchell’s back garden?

What did Shane Mitchell say when he was asked about those fires?

Killer Luke Mitchell had told the police his brother Shane and his mother Corinne had had a fire in the garden that night.

The Mitchell’s Were Forensically Aware

Why didn’t Sandra Lean include the answers to these questions in her 2nd book, which Sharon claimed to Emma was “all based on the provable facts from the case files”?

Sharon also stated “normally people who burn things overlook in the disposal process”.

Why would Luke Mitchell’s leave zips, studs and rivets in the remnants of the log burner to be found by the police?

Did Sharon base her statements on the fact dangerous, psychopathic killer (of humans and animals) and rapist Steven Avery “overlooked” Teresa Halbach’s bones and teeth in the “burn pit” and “burn barrel” that he and rapist and killer Brendan Dassey used in their “disposal process” attempt?

Even Pro Knox woman’ Michelle Moore’s husband gouger and innocence fraud promoter Steve Moore wasn’t prepared to back these two dangerous killers and the fraudulent spin campaign which promoted them (Read more here).

Read more about killer Luke Mitchell and those fires by tapping on the buttons below;

Sharon also stated;

Luke did not own a parka before Jodi’s death it was purchased afterwards when the police took every stitch of clothing he had they even got the receipt for the parka. Many people said they saw MK wearing a parka around Dalkeith so not Luke.

Sharon Indy Sunshine – 24th October 2022

Killer Luke Mitchell did own a khaki green parka style jacket before he and his mother Corinne Mitchell purchased a replacement from FLIP in Edinburgh a few days after his murder.

Paragraph 19 of the court of appeal judgement clearly stated;

There was evidence that the appellant had owned and worn a parka-style jacket in the months prior to the murder

Excerpt from paragraph 19 of the court of appeal judgement

Wilfully Being Blinded By The Very Real Innocence Fraud Phenomenon

Sharon also went on to state;

I would say to people, take their grievances up with the fact we do not have FOIA in this country. It is not us hiding things from people or wilfully being blinded.

Sharon Indy Sunshine Aka Sharon Young

It is because of what sadistic killer and pathological liar Luke Mitchell told police during his initial interviews, and his mother and brothers police statements and interviews, and their evidence given during his trial – that helped prove his guilt.

Sharon appears to be a renowned sympathiser for many dangerous, psychopathic killers and rapists.

There is zero doubt Sharon is “wilfully being blinded”.

Link to Part 90 here