As referred to in the previous Part of this ongoing blog series, Roberta Glass from the Roberta Glass True Crime Report recently published a video called Free Psycho Killer Luke Mitchell! which can be listened to below;
Roberta Glass referred to the numerous bottles of urine found in the bedroom of killer Luke Mitchell during the police search of the house he was living in at the time he committed his murder.
In response, one of the killers most abusive and vicious cult followers Heather Brunt made a clip of Roberta Glass referring to the bottles of urine.
Along with her short clip Heather Brunt stated;
Please Listen ( Only 12sec) And Share How Vicious Roberta Glass is Laughing At A Traumatized Child Who’d Just Seen His Murdered & Mutilated G/f What An EVIL COW
Heather Brunt – Source here
Heather Brunt also stated;
Psychologist recognise it as a thing people do after trauma, well what #LukeMitchell experienced as a child you couldn’t get more traumatising
Heather Brunt
Very little gets me mad but to laugh AT a child’s distress, what an utter embarrassment of a human being
Heather Brunt
Bottles of urine under his bed because of trauma, doesn’t make him a murderer. She’s a wicked person
Heather Brunt
In response to Heather Brunt’s statements Karolina Polcik stated;
she’s evil
Karolina Polcik
Killer Had Been Urininating In Bottles Before His Murder
Killer Luke Mitchell had been urinating in bottles and keeping them in his bedroom before he committed his murder on the 30th of June 2003.
Bottles containing urine were found in the killers bedroom on the 4th of July 2003 by police during there search and also on others occasions when searches were carried out.
A Scotsman article stated;
It was the strong smell of ammonia which first struck detectives when they walked into Luke Mitchell’s bedroom.
If that initially puzzled them, then their next discovery would startle even the most hardened investigators.
There lying under the teenager’s bed were bottle after bottle of a cloudy liquid, looking suspiciously like urine.
More bottles were hidden away in drawers, some wrapped up in socks. Soon there were 20 bottles lying in front of the bewildered detectives. Lab tests would later show they were the 15-year-old’s own urine.
Excerpts from a Scotsman article headed Urine under bed paints picture of oddball killer dated 16th May 2008
A BBC article stated;
John Beckett QC, representing the Crown, told Lords Hamilton, Osborne and Kingarth:
“His explanation was that because he slept on top of a bunk bed it was more convenient to do that than to do anything else.
“It was to show that explanation was untrue. The new ones (bottles) came at a time when his position was that he was sleeping in the living room next to his mother, or something like that”
Mr Beckett argued the evidence was presented in anticipation the defence would attempt to show Mitchell had the bedroom of a “normal” teenager.
Excerpts from a BBC article headed Mitchell’s urine habit ‘relevant’ dated 15th February 2008
Excerpts from the 16th May 2008 court of appeal judgement stated;
..the trial judge gave clear directions to the jury that they should not judge the appellant on the basis of his personal conduct or habits or lifestyle, except to the extent that these might be relevant to the issues of fact which they had to decide.
We have come to the view that, in the particular circumstances before him, the trial judge did not err in allowing the evidence in question to be led and that there is no merit in this ground of appeal.
[128] The background to this matter is fully disclosed in the report from the trial judge.
During the search of 203 Newbattle Abbey Crescent on 4 July 2003 a number of bottles containing liquid were found in the appellant’s bedroom, some on and some under the bed.
This was a cabin type bed and the appellant slept on the upper level.
Some of the bottles could be seen in a book of photographs containing photographs of the appellant’s bedroom.
Forensic examination indicated that the liquid was urine. During the evidence of Mahasweta Roy, a forensic scientist, she was asked by the Advocate depute about the relevant passage in a forensic science report.
[131] At a later stage the Crown sought to lead a passage from a police interview with the appellant on 14 August 2003 in which the appellant explained why he had kept the bottles – broadly, that he had started urinating in bottles because one time he had fallen off his bed when he got up to go to the toilet during the night, that he had hurt his head and had woken everyone up in the house.
Excerpts from Court of appeal judgement LUKE MITCHELL v. HER MAJESTY’S ADVOCATE dated 16th May 2008
Why didn’t killer Luke Mitchell use the bathroom, instead of urinating in bottles and keeping them in his bedroom, when he was allegedly sleeping downstairs in the living room?
Also why didn’t his mother Corinne Mitchell encourage her son to clean the urine bottles out of his room and use the bathroom instead?
Scammer Sandra Lean’s Myth
Sandra Lean falsely claimed in her 1st discredited book;
Another complete red herring was the finding of bottles of urine found in Luke’s bedroom. Just what, exactly, these had to do with Luke‟s likelihood of having been Jodi’s murderer is still unclear, yet the finding of these bottles was given great significance by both the prosecution and the press, in a blatant attempt to encourage suspicion and revulsion towards Luke Mitchell.
The perfectly innocent explanation – that the trauma of events had triggered a form of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), compelling him to “hold on” to literally everything, never made it to the public domain.
Excerpt from Sandra Lean’s 1st discredited book No Smoke: The Shocking Truth About British Justice
In reality, “the trauma of events” linked to Luke Mitchell’s murder of Jodi Jones🌻 could not have “triggered” him into urinating into bottles prior to his murder!
Tap on the button below to read some parallels with 14 year old psychopathic killer Aiden Fucci;
Tap on the button below to read Part 256 which includes more on Heather Brunt;
INNOCENCE FRAUD WATCH 