He said he was extremely shaken up and could not remember anything about the day Jodi was killed as his memory had been affected due to a drugs problem a few years ago.
Excerpt from Edinburgh news article headed Shane Mitchell: what evidence did Luke Mitchell’s brother give – and why was it crucial to Jodi Jones murder trial? dated 1st March 2021
*Guest Blog*
You (all) consistently say this was a flimsy case – lasted 9 weeks on the basis of rubbish.
Yet you fail completely to explain with any conviction a single part of the Luke Mitchells actions for that evening.
You most certainly do not explain, with any conviction why the police fitted up Luke Mitchell.
For first of all, you actually have to explain every single piece of their testimony.
Every piece of information they gave with believable conviction, do you not.
You ask for this to do with every other area of evidence? –
Luke Mitchells first surely?
You are saying everyone else was air brushed over but not them?
So if all is well, then you should see no need to air brush them over? To shore over those holes by way of extraordinary explanations?
Rather than consistently moving away from the gaping holes in every part of their story – whilst wanting to know irrelevant details of Andrina Bryson’s activities after this sighting.
Whilst constantly striving to find areas of lies in these others with “not as honest as you think eh?”
When you yourself have actually lied in an attempt to scrape up some lie from them.
Where you clearly stated “Judith told the police her daughter had ‘never’ walked this path alone” –
the problem with this Faithlilly, is, if as you claim this case was wafer thin, that there was no evidence at all against Luke Mitchell – why do you need to lie? in an attempt to show this to be the case?
And it is not the only blatant lie you have told.
Why has Sandra Lean lied about this search trio of walking passed the cousins and so forth, why has Corinne Mitchell lied? – why do people whom profess to seek ‘Truth and Justice’ find it necessary to lie?
In their attempt to show Luke Mitchell innocent – They/you should be able to speak with clarity, on explaining all that the Mitchells said to be true?
And then move onto the areas of doubt you hold around the eye witness testimony and so forth. Not the other way around. You need to show they were speaking the truth.
It should be clear and precise – bang, bang, bang – here is what the Mithcells were doing, here is the truth.
Straight from them. None of this well it might have been, or maybe this and I think it was probably this.
Speaking constantly for them, and constantly excusing and given obtuse reasons for the lies? by adding lies to it?
Like Gordo – Speaking of the mystery man – ‘we think he was sent after her?’
Well that explains everything then. Sent after her for what, that she did not see him, that she went into the woods with them and on it goes. –
These conspiracy theories, do they stem closer to home?
You know what I am beginning to think, is that Shane Mitchell may very well have owned a grey hoodie?
This constant talk of scrapyards and disposal, a mechanic.
This constant talk of very little, in the way of any actual proof as to where he was from the moment he left his friend.
Of Luke Mitchell having to ask his mum if his brother was home.
Of neither you nor Sandra Lean or anyone else, being able to state with clarity what time Shane Mitchell was supposed to have left his house – for no one actually knows.
Of Shane Mitchell wanting the police to think he had been in his house from 3.30pm?
For whichever way you look at that ever changing story – is is clearly made up.
And it is the only area, that makes you wonder if the police actually got the wrong person, was it the wrong brother?
Or if they were in fact colluded in some way? – this constant talk of more than one person being involved?
And we know the strive comes right from the Mitchells to make people look away from them –
Of drugs? who supplied Shane Mitchell, who supplied Luke and who supplied Corinne Mitchell?
And you want to know what Andrina Bryson was doing in her house after the sighting? –
We want to know exactly what went on in the Mitchell house.
So here is your opportunity, yet again – to explain with sense and clarity this dinner tale from 5.05pm until Luke Mitchell leaving at 5.45pm in those first accounts and of Shane Mitchell claiming to arrive home at 3.30pm – to then move onto statement no 4 – where everything became squeezed into 15mins and the story had changed 4 times in a matter of days?
You quote some quasi truth? – again closer to home?
One may consistently bank on those, who simply believed tabloid trash, for it to be said enough to become fact in their minds –
Of bottles of urine, satanic worship and Manson. Where one simplifies this case to the point of ridicule.
Then uses the exact same methods, where the majority of support comes from those very same mindsets?
But mostly Faithlilly all and everything is aimed at distraction – distracting away from every part of the testimony that the Mitchells gave themselves.
Where the suspicion began and remained.
From the moment Luke Mitchell calmly and collectively spoke to the emergency services that evening.
It was never to do with some ridiculous notion that one policeman out of three people noted “with the boyfriend” It was from Luke Mitchell himself.
(Link to original forum post here)
INNOCENCE FRAUD WATCH 