Killer Luke Mitchell: Clear Deception Regarding The V Break In The Wall (Part 45)

*Guest Blog*

Interesting article from the Herald including a paragraph on just this topic.

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/16881799.circumstantial-evidence-convicted-luke-mitchell

‘Location of the body

A large plank of evidence used to convict Mitchell, was that he supposedly knew the location of the body and led family members to the area where Jones was murdered.

The teenager was the fourth member of the search party. It comprised of Mitchell, Jodi’s grandmother, sister, and her sister’s fiancé.

Whilst searching the area with the rest of the party, Luke Mitchell claimed that his German shepherd – partially trained to track by a professional handler – alerted him by jumping up against the wall, which Jones was found behind.

This claim was initially corroborated by the family members of the search party. Files show that these statements were changed approximately one month after the event. The original statements, which supported Mitchell’s claim, were put to the witnesses by his defence QC Donald Findlay but they said they were unable to remember or it was not what they meant.’

Isn’t it odd how the Herald are reporting exactly what Dr Lean claimed in her book?

And yet again no demand for a retraction from Jones or Kelly.

Context:

Thank you for clarifying my point once more with the same old bleats.

So the change, the clarification was, that they went directly to the V break, to, they went directly to the V break.

So it is this “pulling” word to being led/directed by Luke Mitchell, on that short piece of rope.

Where Donald Findlay ‘you said “pulling” then changed it, so what you really meant was that the dog was alerting to something?

“No” that is not what I meant. It was pulling on that rope, but it had been “pulling” directed by Luke Mitchell to the first break, in front, into the field, in front and directly again to the second break.

That was the clarification, it was always directly to that break in the wall. It was always in complete contrast to Luke Mitchell’s lies. 

Yes Faith, we know that the book is built from media reports. With the clear deception and inference one has had access to all this wonderful stuff – BS.

It is why we have people claiming that 9 weeks consisted of nothing, for it is those brief reports from a couple of minutes of evidence (from around 4hrs worth), reported each day it comes from. Such wonderful proof and as above.

Was Allen Ovens a witness for the Crown? ‘I do not know, I can’t recall seeing anything in the NEWSPAPERS!’ (Sandra Lean) Such an expert, eh? 

Bang, bang, bang.

Luke Mitchell’s dog was not leading Luke Mitchell anywhere, he was leading that girls family directly to her body. To the first break, intro of the woods.

Quick shine with torch, into the field a few steps, quick shine with torch, straight to the second break, up and over and it is 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9 steps (if lucky), about turn and shout. 

Chalk and cheese. Dog bounding, (on that short piece of rope), jumping frantically against a wall (short piece of rope), pawing away at the wall and putting it’s nose into alert mode and “air sniffing“.

There is so much left out from his account, erased, that we have one of his main supporters now, saying “the dog was sniffing to the left at the break in the wall” –

Absolutely outstanding. Or ‘Luke Mitchell knew to go left as his dog did not react before the break, only at it!‘ 

Chalk and cheese, always to that break to always to that break from the search trio.

Luke Mitchell “We had walked some distance past a break in the wall, not even 20 yards when my dog ————“

To those four weeks later. After searchers being taken back to the path to relive that night.

To his map and clarification, it was not more than 60ft past the break, it was directly “parallel” to where Jodi lay in the woods, 43ift past that break in the wall.

These are Luke Mitchell’s words, you can not erase them and bring him all the way back to the break, to try and infer that a dog “pulling” at this break meant “They all agreed the dog found Jodi then changed their minds” –

You can bring him all the way back if you like, erase and change his evidence, it simply highlights what was always highlighted.

Luke Mitchell had special knowledge.

Up and over. No trepidation of step, complete familiarity, Luke Mitchell knew it intimately. Knew exactly where to go. 

Around 8 mins. Bang, bang, bang. –

Have a bloody word with yourself. And again, clear reason why Donald Findlay took no dogs that day, for it was NOT the dog that was going to be highlighted before that court, with the building of that wall. It was putting 4 people 43ft apart.

Three where they claimed from the off they were, at the break and one 43ft past. And back, Luke Mitchell was lying his head off.

We know the search party were always telling the truth, for you can not see a damn thing past that break in the wall. Every description, including using the bloody word, was at that break. 

Led to that path by him, led directly to that girls body, by him.

10:40pm known to be missing, 10:50pm introduces a physical search of the path, 10:59pm he is on that path, set off with them around 11:22pm, 11:30pm shouting out he has found something and 11:34pm and those “flat affect tones” calling the emergency services. “I think we have found something ———–-”

Screams in the background from Alice Walker and Janine Jones and Stephen Kelly retching up his stomach contents. 

So much more, do we move on to the next set of lies here?

“Whisked away and separated instantly from the others” –

Bollocks. Sitting puffing away, soaking everything up, erasing the contents of his phone and blanking his mother.

There was nothing wrong with Luke Mitchell’s signal –

Give over with the utter BS. 

So what exactly is there to retract here?

We clarified “pulling” on a short rope to being directed?

They did make a change, so did Luke Mitchell, but they always said directly to the break.

So no, not ever did they make any claim that the dog had led them to Jodi’s body, these were Luke Mitchell’s words.

And Luke Mitchell was lying.
(Original forum post here)

Link to Part 46 here