How Did Hornswoggler Nick Wallis Come To His Conclusion That Lawyer Jarnail Singh “Revealed Himself To Be An Exceptionally Dangerous Man”? (Part 43)

According to a 1st December 2023 blog by Nick Wallis here he stated;

We know from the witnesses during Bates v Post Office and the Inquiry evidence we’ve heard over most of 2023 that the Post Office is stuffed to the gills with lifers, plodders and gormless apparatchiks inexplicably promoted into positions way beyond their ability. 

Nick Wallis – 1st December 2023

Referring to lawyer Jarnail Singh, Nick Wallis claimed;

….Singh revealed himself to be an exceptionally dangerous man, inhabiting a fantasy world manufactured by a priceless combination of the Peter Principle and the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Nick Wallis – 1st December 2023

Then referring to Jarnail Singh’s evidence during the charade which is the post office Horizon IT inquiry, Nick Wallis went on to state;

Many of Singh’s answers were like this – forthright denial of something, followed by obfuscatory guff and then an oblique admission or, more usually, a change of subject.

Nick Wallis – 1st December 2023

For “forthright denial of something”, “obfuscatory guff”, “oblique admissions” and “more usually a change of subject” have a read of perjurer, thief and fraudster Seema Misra’s evidence during her 2010 trial.

Tap on the button below to read trial transcripts – from page 27;

Tap on the button below to read more about the Seema Misra case;

Link to Part 44 here