To Commit An Outrage Against Someone
The word hybristophilia was apparently derived from the Greek word hubrizein meaning “to commit an outrage against someone” and seemingly links back to a man called John Money who is said to have been a pro-pedophile pervert.
Hybristophilia appears to have been bastardized over the years and was used by David Wilson in a November 2021 article he wrote for the Daily Record headed We need to stop our caged killers getting fan mail from groupies where he stated in part;
Having worked with a number of high profile, media-savvy offenders in prison I became immediately aware of the phenomenon known as hybristophilia – the sexual interest that some women have for those who have committed violent crimes.
Last month the Danes introduced a law to ban life-sentenced prisoners from receiving fan mail from new pen pals, and limiting their contact to friends that they had had before they were convicted for the first 10 years of their sentence.
As the Danish justice minister Nick Haekkerup said when introducing the bill, convicted criminals “should not be able to use prisons as dating centres, or media platforms.”
Excerpt by David Wilson from a Daily Record article headed We need to stop our caged killers getting fan mail from groupies dated 29th November 2021
Danish justice minister Nick Haekkerup also stated around the time;
We have seen distasteful examples in recent years of prisoners who have committed vile crimes contacting young people in order to gain their sympathy and attention
This must obviously be stopped
Excerpts from a Guardian article by Jon Henley headed Denmark to outlaw life sentence prisoners starting new romances dated 21st September 2021
In response to David Wilson’s article Innocence Fraud Watch tweeted the following;
What David Wilson @ProfDavidWilson omits to mention in his @Daily_Record article is the ‘fan mail’ of these killers also includes letters from lawyers, students, criminologists, authors, journalists & others
Do these individuals also suffer from the ‘hybristophilia’ phenomenon?
Cammilla Kurstein was a 17 year old schoolgirl who appears to have been exploited and groomed by psychopathic killer Peter Madsen after she apparently wrote to him wanting ‘to know what happened in the man’s head’
Interested to know why you would appear to attach the ‘hybristophilia’ phenomenon to a 17 year old school girl yet seemingly discount it (Or not recognise it) in some lawyers, students, criminologists, authors & journalists etc. who also write letters to killers
Excerpts by Innocence Fraud Watch here
“Media Savvy” Convicted Murderers
David Wilson has seemingly done a 180 degree turn on his “…convicted criminals ‘should not be able to use prisons as dating centres, or media platforms” spiel, and has added his support to 14 year old Jodi Jones’ murderers’ fraudulent public relations (PR) spin campaign and written a bizarre article for the Scottish Herald.
David Wilson made the following obscene statement;
..there is literally nothing – nothing – I could uncover that warranted Luke even being charged with Jodi’s murder, never mind being sent to trial
Excerpt by David Wilson for The Herald dated 12th April 2023
In January 2005 Rosalind McInness wrote an article for the BBC headed A uniquely hard case, in which she referred to some of the difficulties reporters faced reporting on the murderers 42 day trial.
This included “protecting vulnerable participants”, like the other young teenage girls who gave evidence about the violent assaults they had suffered at the hands of the then future killer.
After his murder trial, it came to light that other girls had been threatened with a knife held to their throats by Luke Mitchell, who clearly had an undiagnosed “conduct disorder with callous-unemotional traits”.
Tap on the below link to read about some of the facts which came to light regarding the murderers apparent undiagnosed “conduct disorder with callous–unemotional traits”
When Luke Mitchell decided to commit his murder, he “repeatedly struck” Jodi Jones “on the head and body, compressed her throat and restricted her breathing and caused her to fall to the ground”.
He took his brown handled folding Jack Pyke knife, or “something of this ilk” and slashed Jodi Jones throat, “cutting the main artery in her neck seven-eights of the way through”.
Jodi Jones “jugular vein had also been cut right through and the main nerve had also been nicked”. The knife “slash” had “gone through all three structures”, and according to professor Anthony Busuttil this was “fatal almost immediately”.
Tap on the link below to read more on sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell’s murder TIMELINE;
Duplicitous Gaslighter & Fraud Sandra Lean Has Misrepresented The Facts Of The Case & Placed A False & Misleading Narrative Into The Public Domain
David Wilson started his Herald article with;
I’ve never needed to be convinced that miscarriages of justice happen in Scotland.
Excerpt by David Wilson for The Herald dated 12th April 2023
Jodi Jones’ murderer PR spin campaign is yet another example of the very real innocence fraud phenomenon, not the outdated “miscarriage of justice” phenomenon.
There has not been a “breach of the carriage of justice” in this case!
The PR spin campaign is one of fraud ie; “intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain”.
There are many examples in Scotland of the innocence fraud phenomenon and the sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell’s is up there as one of the worst examples.
The PR spin campaign has been headed up by a duplicitous gaslighter and fraud called Sandra Lean, who did not attend the 42 day trial. For around 16 years or so, Sandra Lean has misrepresented the actual facts of the case, which is something she has form for in several other cases and PR spin campaigns.
This ongoing blog series has debunked a lot of Sandra Lean’s nonsense and propaganda. The Index can be found by tapping on the link below;
Blagging
What is extremely interesting about David Wilson’s article, is that he chose to omit to mention Sandra Lean’s name and instead claimed;
I have been able to: read transcripts from Luke’s trial; consult various appeals that were made on his behalf; looked at a range of newspaper commentary (some of which supported his conviction); watched Murder in a Small Town and also part of the Trials that Shocked Scotland series; listened to a podcast about the case – which also devoted most of an episode to Luke Mitchell speaking from prison (and he clearly is an intelligent man); and delved into some social media – which I can assure you is not for the faint-hearted.
Excerpt by David Wilson for The Herald dated 12th April 2023
David Wilson telling porkie pies when he stated;
I have been able to: read transcripts from Luke’s trial..
Excerpt by David Wilson for The Herald dated 12th April 2023
What transcripts could David Wilson have possibly been able to read, given the fact there are no transcripts available to read in the public domain, and a large volume of evidence heard during the trial has never been transcribed.
Innocence Fraud Watch are of the firm opinion David Wilson was, and is blagging.
David Wilson’s following statement was also interesting, as it appears to have been about Jane Hamilton and he appears to have attempted to throw her under the bus;
…looked at a range of newspaper commentary (some of which supported his conviction)
Excerpt by David Wilson for The Herald dated 12th April 2023
Jane Hamilton wrote a few articles in 2021, calling out the two part innocence fraud propaganda TV show called Murder In A Small Town, referred to by David Wilson.
As a result, Jane Hamilton was subjected to a malicious and fabricated smear campaign orchestrated by Sandra Lean; something else she has form for.
The TV show rewrote history and the narrative told was based on the false and misleading narrative told by Sandra Lean in her second innocence fraud book, which she callously called ‘Innocent’s Betrayed’ (David Wilson published a book in 2002 called ‘Innocence Betrayed’).
The podcast David Wilson referred to, was also based on Sandra Lean’s false and misleading narrative, which Innocence Fraud Watch will be addressing in due course;
It would be interesting to learn what ‘social media’ David Wilson was referring to, as it is clear he did not carry out any due diligence. Sandra Lean is not a reliable narrator and source and has told no end of lies.
David Wilson does however appear to have noticed one lie perpetuated by Sandra Lean, and the murderer and his mother Corinne Mitchell, as he stated;
..nor is it true that his clothing was destroyed by his mother after the event
Excerpt by David Wilson for The Herald dated 12th April 2023
On page 34 of her innocence fraud book Sandra Lean stated;
..according to the prosecution..
Luke then coolly returned home and had his mother destroy a parka jacket he wore during the attack, in a log burner in the back garden and between them, they arranged for the disposal of the murder weapon
Sandra Lean – Page 34 IB
The prosecution never told the jury that Corinne Mitchell had burned her sons parka jacket in the back garden. This was another manufactured innocence fraud narrative;
Alan Turnbull prosecuting, also told the jury at the High Court in Edinburgh that Mitchell, 16, thought he was ‘untouchable’.
He said Jodi’s injuries had been “inflicted with calm deliberation”
He added:
“Her killer had a cold, calculating presence of mind and it is not difficult to look to Luke Mitchell as her killer. He discussed these awful events in a TV interview with not a tear, not a quiver, not the slightest indication of upset”
Excerpts from the Daily Record by Ian Dow article headed Murder jury hear of morbid interests dated January 2005
He said Mitchell even had the presence of mind to plot his defence immediately after the murder by phoning Jodi’s home and burning a parka he had worn during the attack.
DS Craig Dobbie stated;
We know clothes were missing from Luke’s wardrobe and we know the burner was used
Was the clothing burned? It’s a distinct possibility
Statements made by DS Craig Dobbie reported by Jack Mathieson for the Daily Record dated 22nd January 2005
Another lie told by Sandra Lean is as follows;
Judith’s claim that she woke Joseph at around 10.30pm, because Jodi was missing, was clearly mistaken – it was not until 10.40pm that Judith discovered Jodi had not been with Luke
Sandra Lean – page 89 IB
Judith Jones sent a text message to killer Luke Mitchell’s phone at 10:20pm, reported by the Herald here.
Sandra Lean also stated in her book;
Something is very wrong here. Judith did not know and could not have told anyone else that Jodi had not been with Luke that evening, until after she hung up the call with Luke at 10.42:40pm
Sandra Lean – page 142 IB
Sandra Lean’s bare faced lies about Jodi Jones’ loved ones are abhorrent and they are intentional, told to mislead, deceive and gaslight anyone who doesn’t have a basic comprehension of the facts of the case.
David Wilson appears to be an egomaniac with no scruples who has jumped on the bandwagon of a lost cause and has used his waning “celebrity” status in an attempt to keep himself relevant.
David Wilson is a hypocrite who has committed an outrage to Jodi Jones memory, to Jodi Jones loved ones and he has committed an outrage to all the other innocent people caught up in this blatant innocence fraud PR spin campaign.
INNOCENCE FRAUD WATCH 
2 thoughts on “Killer Luke Mitchell: Could David Wilson ‘Suffer’ From Hybristophilia? (Part 176)”