Killer Luke Mitchell: And Yet More On LIARS & ABUSERS Scott Forbes & Sandra Lean & Their Innocence FRAUD (Part 140)

*Guest Blog*

Seriously Scott Forbes, does the manipulation have no bounds, of course not –

Have a word!

Transparent but only for those with connected wires of course.

12 years are NOT from 2014 UNLESS the SCCRC (Scottish criminal cases review commission) made a specific requirement to have ‘CERTAIN’ items retained and NOT the everything Scott Forbes.

And that is only IF this has actually taken place at all with them.

Productions numbers, as broad as they are long, and not all and most are not relevant in themselves. Take the wall built in the Laigh Hall as an example Scott Forbes.

But it is this legal action cherry-picked response, seriously Scott Forbes.

Has Luke Mitchell requested or/and found out that items personally belonging to him have been disposed of, without checking with him first for permission.

That response directly to do with legal matters around this. As above, ONLY if the SCCRC made any specific requirements around certain items being retained, would any breach have taken place, which of course lies with the Crown Scott Forbes NOT the police.

So labelled items and many of them. There would be his shiny green bomber, his Jack Pyle knife, his pouch used as actual productions in evidence, there would be masses of other items not used but still labelled under many items.

Have these begun to be destroyed Scott Forbes, now halted whilst any action/discussion is carried out to see what he MAY wish returned to him?

So, it is also around significance Scott Forbes –

That 12 years which for just about everything started Scott Forbes well before the refusal from the SCCRC, from when that guilty verdict came about Scott Forbes, of Luke Mitchell and the case first being made aware of legal bodies. Of a case solved Scott Forbes.

Nice try though. But do not lose hope Scott Forbes, whilst one carrot to draw support for re-testing the many insignificant items, there will of course be many samples sitting in test tubes Scott Forbes stored, for any advancements in science Scott Forbes.

That ability to extract so much more than one could in 2003, and of course when the SCCRC carried out further testing also –

To clarify Scott Forbes the sound reason for that agreement in place, to pull fully from so much more –

Luke Muir Mitchell, Luke Muir Mitchell, Luke Muir Mitchell

(Read more on killer Luke Mitchell’s DNA by tapping on the link below;)

Which is not what one is looking for of course, just something else around something else, that feigned silver bullet Scott Forbes.

For any advancement when producing many more profiles will result in his enablers saying, what has been getting said all along –

They were in a relationship!

This ‘hidden’ nonsense and again for the intellectually inept Scott Forbes.

This list no doubt given by simple request, and around items belonging to Luke Mitchell.

Where his actual professional defence, who put their case of fence together had full access of course to those many labelled, numbered items.

We need only take the knife in skip as an example of what you class as being ‘Hidden’ –

Splashes all over the media in 2003 Scott Forbes

Behave!

(Read more on the knife in the skip which was eliminated in 2003 by tapping on the link below;)

Link to Part 141 here