![](https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/84c6ff48-95d7-449c-a584-2c7b46480798.jpeg?w=938)
![](https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/0f066365-4c5e-49d1-8bea-8a36b2fff950.jpeg?w=944)
Corrine Mitchell’s Version Of Events
During Part 1 of the 2021 channel 5 TV innocence fraud show entitled Murder In A Small Town killer Luke Mitchell’s mother Corinne Mitchell stated;
I sprinted up to the police station
Eh asked where my child and my dog were
I was shown into a room
And the sight was just horrendous
Luke was sitting in ah white forensic suit
He had been stripped naked
Corinne Mitchell (At approx 25:06)
Court Of Appeal Judges Judgment Demonstrates Inconsistencies In Corinne Mitchell’s Story
However the 2008 court of appeal judgement had previously described a different version of events.
The appeal court judges indicated in their written judgement that killer Luke Mitchell did not give his permission for his clothing to be taken until after he had concluded his 22 page written witness statement.
An excerpt from paragraph 159 of the 2008 court of appeal judgement stated:
At the conclusion of the interview with the accused, which was not under caution and in respect of which evidence had been led without objection, he agreed to the taking of his clothes by the police and the examination of his person and the taking of a blood sample by a police surgeon
Paragraph 159 of the 2008 court of appeal judgement
Tap on the button below to read the updated TIMELINE of almost 15 year old killer Luke Mitchell’s murder;