*Guest Blog*
Such a mess of mismatched one liners to add weight to nothing. The fairy tale gets worse, does it not?
Let’s take an example of one liners from these first statements.
Luke Mitchell – I walked passed a V in the wall, some distance and my dog jumped up and started air sniffing
Stephen Kelly – We were at a V in the wall.
Janine Jones – When we got to a V in the wall.
See the massive difference there already Faithlilly – it is all very well Sandra Lean extracting one liners from statements of a 1000 words, they don’t tell us anything outwith what Sandra Lean may want to add – couple of arms and legs here and there. Red flag to the police however.
Let us expand. Luke Mitchell not only states that his dog was “air sniffing” he also states that his dog had reacted “parallel to where Jodi lay on the other side”
This girl was actually around 40ft away from the V in the wall. Passed it on the woodland side.
Stephen Kelly in his first statement – “the dogs head was level with the V” It was dark, there is absolutely no way Stephen Kelly could have given any type of comparison of the dogs head being level with the V if it was where Luke Mitchell said it was.
But all red herrings from Sandra Lean – it was not about the dog, it was about where Luke Mitchell said he was, the description he gave least not the biggest red flag of all, the time factor.
10mins – that is all it took, from the search party meeting next to this high school, for Luke Mitchell to keep the lead, to climb the wall well before the V and look into the woodland. None of the other members of the search party gave the woods a second thought. To then come to this V, at and around the actual V itself, Luke Mitchell climbed over the wall and turned left. Stephen Kelly and Janine Jones had barely walked a few feet when he shouted he had found something.
Let us be real here – The best search teams in the world even with professionally trained dogs – could never have found Jodi Jones in this time frame. 10mins. Not a dog walker or anyone else in the woodland that night – in daylight saw or found this girl – she was ultimately well hidden, behind and wait for it, another extraction from Luke Mitchell’s first statements.
“I saw what I thought was a Taylors dummy, behind a large OAK tree, I could see a red bobble in it’s hair” He made out the type of tree, and a bobble that even the pathologist did not come across at first.
All this in 10mins – from Luke Mitchell who further claimed he did not know of the existence of this V prior to that night. He had walked this path many times in daylight.
All this in 10mins – from Luke Mitchell who further claimed he had never been in this woodland before that night. Really?
These claims of DNA in full profiles of an unknown male – Not multiple DNA profiles from multiple unknown males. This is a woodland, I wonder what DNA any of us would pick up innocently traipsing around in it – far less with what may have taken place that day.
So, no Faithlilly – It is Sandra Lean who attempts to put weight to water continuously with these these claims of statements changing – do you know what clarified means?
Donald Findlay – the defence team had access to everything Sandra Lean had/has – Of course this was available for the Jury to hear/see. They did.
They didn’t of course see any of Sandra Lean’s arms and legs, why would they? – The Scottish criminal cases review commission however saw right through her when they dismissed these fairy tales.
INNOCENCE FRAUD WATCH 
One thought on “killer Luke Mitchell: The Fairy Tale Gets Worse (Part 66)”