Killer Luke Mitchell: Latest On Tom Halliday, Creepy “Mr Big” Ronnie Mothersole & Scott “Beam Me Up Scottie” Forbes (Part 130)

Fantasist “Mr Big” Aka Ronnie Mothersole Aka Ron M & His Sick Mind & Projections

Statement made on YouTube account on the 20th November 2022
Ronnie Mothersole aka Ron M

Ronnie Mothersole is referred to in Parts 80, 81, 83 and 103 of Toxic Abuser & Pretend Criminologist Sandra Lean’s 19 Year HOAX PR Campaign & The Innocence Fraud Phenomenon Gravy Train Scam of Psychopathic Killer Luke Mitchell. Tap on each link below to read more;

 *Guest Blog*

Clearly it is Ron M who has some series problems going on upstairs, and no surprise in the slightest that he supports the other one who is the same. 

When I read that on You Tube –

It spelt the following, an up the ante on the constant abuse from Scott Forbes with his playground behaviour, as with yourself, every poster is applied as being one of the ‘others‘ not to be listened to.

I believe I have been Jane Hamilton, someone in the police, but above all someone who appears to be downing buckets of vodka by the minute, whilst on “mushrooms?”

The usual –

Cannot prove what is being said around the actual evidence to be wrong, so Scott Forbes simply attacks constantly. He has absolutely no intellectual skills to discuss and debate. 

So, this threat of sorts, a ‘wee’ message from the four corners of ‘Glesgi’ perhaps. To try and silence the discussion. –

The reversal of course of ‘There will be those who oppose the truth‘ to those who are lying constantly being exposed.

A poster on the Blue Forum stopped for a while for he had been threatened, such is the level of thugs involved in Luke Mitchell’s pleas of innocence. As of course was Jane Hamilton herself.

The main support and not of course those who are intelligent enough to have their doubts around realistic areas. Who do not jump from ‘guilty by media‘ to ‘Innocence by the same means’ to ‘Joining in with the smear-campaign’ 

Thank Goodness Scott Forbes Is A Pretend Lawyer & Not A Police Officer

The knife was found in a skip, were Joe J and Ferris frequented, in a skip the man seen running from the murder scene was heading towards. Police forensics teams searched for the tip of the knife. The knife there after ‘disappeared’.

Scott Forbes

Dim and dimmer still.

I put up what came directly from the Mitchell’s, and he applies it as being “drivel

I put up further information, which as you know, some was ‘gleamed‘ from Sandra Lean, and he applies “Where are you getting this ———–?” from.

For a male who claims to have studied case papers forever, he knows virtually nothing of the actual case itself, of LM V HMA.

But alas and is clear, Scott Forbes role is not around LM V HMA, is it? 

Scott Forbes takes the bog standard, someone said something as being the only truth, that the actual words were spoken (that is the truth part), and transforms these into something that belongs in a very bad sci fi story! 

The knife in the skip, class is it not? –

That the police did nothing, just send in a forensic team to rake through a skip looking for the tip.

It did not form part of the trial is the astonishment of the male who had the skip?

Aug 2003 Forensic Tests On Knife Found In Skip – Which Tom Halliday & Pretend Lawyer Scott Forbes Attempted To Pretend, Almost 20 Years Later, Hadn’t Been Tested

Police hunting the killer of Midlothian teenager Jodi Jones are carrying out forensic tests on a knife discovered in skip near where her body was found.

Excerpt by Kirsty Scott article headed Forensic tests on knife found near Jodi dated 23rd August 2003
Tom Halliday aka @WullieHalliday

That will be because it was NOT evidence, yielding nothing of any value.

But alas and sadly, he has fallen into that fantasy of the police doing nothing with what was not “vital evidence” –

The, they only had lies for Luke saga, because they take at face value those promoting a convicted killer as innocent, without being able to prove this at all. 

It is a threat still the same –

Incited by the disinformation, manipulation and blatant lies of course.

But should anything happen to these innocent people –

There will be no responsibility taken on board from those promoting the lies————– 

(Link to original post here)

Link to Part 131 here

Killer Luke Mitchell: Ana Azaria’s Snippets & Assumptions Are Based On Proven Liar & Trickster Sandra Lean (Part 81)

On another Facebook post for the cult-like group “supporting” the sadistic, psychopathic murderer Luke Mitchell, Kirsty Hesp asked;

Kirsty Hesp

Were the friends from the Abbey who was with Luke that night interviewed and can confirm what time he arrived and left?.x

Kirsty Hesp
Kirsty Hesp

Ana Azaria

Note how Ana Azaria states in her reply to Kirsty Hesp, “I don’t have any specific details from statements given” and appears content to rely on snippets and second hand interpretations from a proven pusher of innocence fraud – ie Sandra Lean;

Yes, they were interviewed, it’s also mentioned in the 2008 appeal document.

Luke was seen at 6pm by 3 boys he knew from school sitting on a wall (the point he said he was waiting for Jodi).

He said he waited around 45 minutes, then met a friend after 7pm (this friend spoke at the trial) and arrived home around 9.05pm.

I don’t have any specific details from statements given by his friends but they did confirm that they were with him at the Abbey.

Ana Azalia
Ana Azaria

Ana Azaria also doesn’t appear phased by the fact that if the murderer was waiting for Jodi Jones for around 45 minutes like he alleged, why didn’t he show any concern for his now late and missing girlfriend – who had asthma and no mobile phone?

Who else witnessed seeing killer Luke Mitchell in these alleged 45 minutes Ana Azaria?

Kirsty Hesp

This is all just ridiculous…xx

Kirsty Hesp
Kirsty Hesp

Ronnie Mothersole

Ana Azaria it must be somewhere
In their statement on what he was wearing

Ronnie Mothersole

Ana Azaria

Ronnie Mothersole To my knowledge the boys that saw him at the wall said he was wearing the green bomber jacket with orange lining and jeans

Ana Azaria

James Lochrie

Ronnie Mothersole

If Luke had just horrifically Slaughtered Jodi I think these boys would have noticed his demeanor.

You can’t just walk away from something like that and carry on as normal .

Even serial killers would have some kind of high going on .

James Lochrie
James Lochrie

What does James Lochrie base his assumption of a teenage psychopathic killers demeanour on and what exactly is it “these boys” would have noticed in his demeanour?

And where does James Lochrie’s belief of a teenage psychopathic killer not behaving normally after having committed murder come from?

What image does James Lochrie have in his head of a ‘serial killer” after they have committed murder?

Link to Part 82 here